國立虎尾科技大學 |

Do Exclusionary Rules Ensure a Fair Trial? = A Comparative Perspective on Evidentiary Rules /

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Do Exclusionary Rules Ensure a Fair Trial?/ edited by Sabine Gless, Thomas Richter.
Reminder of title:	A Comparative Perspective on Evidentiary Rules /
other author:	Gless, Sabine.
Description:	XV, 380 p. 4 illus., 1 illus. in color.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Private international law. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2
ISBN:	9783030125202

Do Exclusionary Rules Ensure a Fair Trial? = A Comparative Perspective on Evidentiary Rules /
Do Exclusionary Rules Ensure a Fair Trial?A Comparative Perspective on Evidentiary Rules /[electronic resource] :edited by Sabine Gless, Thomas Richter. - 1st ed. 2019. - XV, 380 p. 4 illus., 1 illus. in color.online resource. - Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice,741534-6781 ;. - Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice,42.

Part I: Comparative Perspectives -- Chapter 1. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Swiss Perspective -- Chapter 2. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A German Perspective -- Chapter 3. Regulating Interrogations and Excluding Confessions in the United States: Balancing Individual Rights and the Search for the Truth -- Chapter 4. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Taiwanese Perspective -- Chapter 5. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Chinese Perspective -- Chapter 6. Criminal Justice and the Exclusion of Incriminating Statements in Singapore -- Part II: Exclusionary Rules – quo vadis -- Chapter 7. The Purposes and Functions of Exclusionary Rules: A Comparative Overview -- Chapter 8. The Fair Trial Rationale for Excluding Wrongfully Obtained Evidence -- Chapter 9. Exclusionary Rule of Illegal Evidence in China: Observation from Historical and Empirical Perspectives -- Chapter 10. Securing a Fair Trial Through Exclusionary Rules: Do Theory and Practice form a Well-balanced Whole? -- Chapter 11. Exclusionary Rules – Is It Time for Change?

Open Access

This open access publication discusses exclusionary rules in different criminal justice systems. It is based on the findings of a research project in comparative law with a focus on the question of whether or not a fair trial can be secured through evidence exclusion. Part I explains the legal framework in which exclusionary rules function in six legal systems: Germany, Switzerland, People’s Republic of China, Taiwan, Singapore, and the United States. Part II is dedicated to selected issues identified as crucial for the assessment of exclusionary rules. These chapters highlight the delicate balance of interests required in the exclusion of potentially relevant information from a criminal trial and discusses possible approaches to alleviate the legal hurdles involved.

ISBN: 9783030125202

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

1202562
Private international law.

LC Class. No.: K7000-7720.22

Dewey Class. No.: 340.9

Do Exclusionary Rules Ensure a Fair Trial? = A Comparative Perspective on Evidentiary Rules /
LDR:03588nam a22004695i 4500 001 1007449
003 DE-He213
005 20200702023805.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 210106s2019 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783030125202 $9 978-3-030-12520-2
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-12520-2
050 4 $a K7000-7720.22
050 4 $a K7073-7078
072 7 $a LB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LB $2 thema
072 7 $a LAM $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 340.9 $2 23
082 0 4 $a 340.2 $2 23
245 1 0 $a Do Exclusionary Rules Ensure a Fair Trial? $h [electronic resource] : $b A Comparative Perspective on Evidentiary Rules / $c edited by Sabine Gless, Thomas Richter.
250 $a 1st ed. 2019.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2019.
300 $a XV, 380 p. 4 illus., 1 illus. in color. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, $x 1534-6781 ; $v 74
505 0 $a Part I: Comparative Perspectives -- Chapter 1. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Swiss Perspective -- Chapter 2. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A German Perspective -- Chapter 3. Regulating Interrogations and Excluding Confessions in the United States: Balancing Individual Rights and the Search for the Truth -- Chapter 4. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Taiwanese Perspective -- Chapter 5. The Potential to Secure a Fair Trial Through Evidence Exclusion: A Chinese Perspective -- Chapter 6. Criminal Justice and the Exclusion of Incriminating Statements in Singapore -- Part II: Exclusionary Rules – quo vadis -- Chapter 7. The Purposes and Functions of Exclusionary Rules: A Comparative Overview -- Chapter 8. The Fair Trial Rationale for Excluding Wrongfully Obtained Evidence -- Chapter 9. Exclusionary Rule of Illegal Evidence in China: Observation from Historical and Empirical Perspectives -- Chapter 10. Securing a Fair Trial Through Exclusionary Rules: Do Theory and Practice form a Well-balanced Whole? -- Chapter 11. Exclusionary Rules – Is It Time for Change?
506 0 $a Open Access
520 $a This open access publication discusses exclusionary rules in different criminal justice systems. It is based on the findings of a research project in comparative law with a focus on the question of whether or not a fair trial can be secured through evidence exclusion. Part I explains the legal framework in which exclusionary rules function in six legal systems: Germany, Switzerland, People’s Republic of China, Taiwan, Singapore, and the United States. Part II is dedicated to selected issues identified as crucial for the assessment of exclusionary rules. These chapters highlight the delicate balance of interests required in the exclusion of potentially relevant information from a criminal trial and discusses possible approaches to alleviate the legal hurdles involved.
650 0 $a Private international law. $3 1202562
650 0 $a Conflict of laws. $3 560163
650 0 $a International criminal law. $3 784835
650 0 $a Criminal law. $3 569598
650 0 $a Criminal justice, Administration of. $3 566161
650 0 $a Social justice. $3 555049
650 0 $a Human rights. $3 554782
650 1 4 $a Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative Law . $3 1209897
650 2 4 $a International Criminal Law . $3 1254000
650 2 4 $a Criminal Law and Criminal Procedure Law. $3 1209898
650 2 4 $a Criminal Justice. $3 1172042
650 2 4 $a Social Justice, Equality and Human Rights. $3 1105101
700 1 $a Gless, Sabine. $4 edt $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt $3 1226101
700 1 $a Richter, Thomas. $4 edt $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt $3 1200333
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030125196
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030125219
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030125226
830 0 $a Ius Gentium: Comparative Perspectives on Law and Justice, $x 1534-6781 ; $v 42 $3 1253974
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-12520-2
912 $a ZDB-2-LCR
912 $a ZDB-2-SXLC
912 $a ZDB-2-SOB
950 $a Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)
950 $a Law and Criminology (R0) (SpringerNature-43727)