國立虎尾科技大學 |

Investor-State Dispute Settlement and National Courts = Current Framework and Reform Options /

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Investor-State Dispute Settlement and National Courts/ by Gabrielle Kaufmann-Kohler, Michele Potestà.
Reminder of title:	Current Framework and Reform Options /
Author:	Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle.
other author:	Potestà, Michele.
Description:	X, 117 p. 1 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Mediation. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44164-7
ISBN:	9783030441647

Investor-State Dispute Settlement and National Courts = Current Framework and Reform Options /
Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle.

Investor-State Dispute Settlement and National CourtsCurrent Framework and Reform Options /[electronic resource] :by Gabrielle Kaufmann-Kohler, Michele Potestà. - 1st ed. 2020. - X, 117 p. 1 illus.online resource. - Special Issue,2510-6880. - Special Issue,.

Scope and objective of this report -- Why investment arbitration and not domestic courts? The origins of the modern investment dispute resolution system, criticism, and future outlook -- The interplay between investor-state arbitration and domestic courts in the existing IIA framework -- The path to reform of ISDS: What role for national courts? -- Conclusions and recommendations.

Open Access

This open access book examines the multiple intersections between national and international courts in the field of investment protection, and suggests possible modes for regulating future jurisdictional interactions between domestic courts and international tribunals. The current system of foreign investment protection consists of more than 3,000 international investment agreements (IIAs), most of which provide for investment arbitration as the forum for the resolution of disputes between foreign investors and host States. However, national courts also have jurisdiction over certain matters involving cross-border investments. International investment tribunals and national courts thus interact in a number of ways, which range from harmonious co-existence to reinforcing complementation, reciprocal supervision and, occasionally, competition and discord. The book maps this complex relationship between dispute settlement bodies in the current investment treaty context and assesses the potential role of domestic courts in future treaty frameworks that could emerge from the States’ current efforts to reform the system. The book concludes that, in certain areas of interaction between domestic courts and international investment tribunals, the “division of labor” between the two bodies is not always optimal, producing inefficiencies that burden the system as a whole. In these areas, there is a need for improvement by introducing a more fruitful allocation of tasks between domestic and international courts and tribunals – whatever form(s) the international mechanism for the settlement of investment disputes may take. Given its scope, the book contributes not only to legal analysis, but also to the policy reflections that are needed for ongoing efforts to reform investor-State dispute settlement.

ISBN: 9783030441647

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-44164-7doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

643857
Mediation.

LC Class. No.: K5459

Dewey Class. No.: 347.09

Investor-State Dispute Settlement and National Courts = Current Framework and Reform Options /
LDR:03698nam a22004335i 4500 001 1024692
003 DE-He213
005 20200703003954.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 210318s2020 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783030441647 $9 978-3-030-44164-7
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-44164-7 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-44164-7
050 4 $a K5459
072 7 $a LNAC5 $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW006000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LNAC5 $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 347.09 $2 23
100 1 $a Kaufmann-Kohler, Gabrielle. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1320880
245 1 0 $a Investor-State Dispute Settlement and National Courts $h [electronic resource] : $b Current Framework and Reform Options / $c by Gabrielle Kaufmann-Kohler, Michele Potestà.
250 $a 1st ed. 2020.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2020.
300 $a X, 117 p. 1 illus. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a Special Issue, $x 2510-6880
505 0 $a Scope and objective of this report -- Why investment arbitration and not domestic courts? The origins of the modern investment dispute resolution system, criticism, and future outlook -- The interplay between investor-state arbitration and domestic courts in the existing IIA framework -- The path to reform of ISDS: What role for national courts? -- Conclusions and recommendations.
506 0 $a Open Access
520 $a This open access book examines the multiple intersections between national and international courts in the field of investment protection, and suggests possible modes for regulating future jurisdictional interactions between domestic courts and international tribunals. The current system of foreign investment protection consists of more than 3,000 international investment agreements (IIAs), most of which provide for investment arbitration as the forum for the resolution of disputes between foreign investors and host States. However, national courts also have jurisdiction over certain matters involving cross-border investments. International investment tribunals and national courts thus interact in a number of ways, which range from harmonious co-existence to reinforcing complementation, reciprocal supervision and, occasionally, competition and discord. The book maps this complex relationship between dispute settlement bodies in the current investment treaty context and assesses the potential role of domestic courts in future treaty frameworks that could emerge from the States’ current efforts to reform the system. The book concludes that, in certain areas of interaction between domestic courts and international investment tribunals, the “division of labor” between the two bodies is not always optimal, producing inefficiencies that burden the system as a whole. In these areas, there is a need for improvement by introducing a more fruitful allocation of tasks between domestic and international courts and tribunals – whatever form(s) the international mechanism for the settlement of investment disputes may take. Given its scope, the book contributes not only to legal analysis, but also to the policy reflections that are needed for ongoing efforts to reform investor-State dispute settlement.
650 0 $a Mediation. $3 643857
650 0 $a Dispute resolution (Law). $3 686295
650 0 $a Conflict management. $3 563175
650 0 $a International law. $3 557047
650 0 $a Trade. $3 1019351
650 0 $a International economics. $3 680327
650 1 4 $a Dispute Resolution, Mediation, Arbitration. $3 885561
650 2 4 $a International Economic Law, Trade Law. $3 882440
650 2 4 $a International Economics. $3 669217
700 1 $a Potestà, Michele. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1320881
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030441630
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030441654
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030441661
830 0 $a Special Issue, $x 2510-6880 $3 1264951
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44164-7
912 $a ZDB-2-LCR
912 $a ZDB-2-SXLC
912 $a ZDB-2-SOB
950 $a Law and Criminology (SpringerNature-41177)
950 $a Law and Criminology (R0) (SpringerNature-43727)