國立虎尾科技大學 |

Voter Influencing in State Trial Court Judicial Elections in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Houston.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Voter Influencing in State Trial Court Judicial Elections in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Houston./
Author:	Dellinger, Myanna.
Description:	1 online resource (231 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-11A.
Subject:	Public administration. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798379518332

Voter Influencing in State Trial Court Judicial Elections in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Houston.
Dellinger, Myanna.

Voter Influencing in State Trial Court Judicial Elections in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Houston. - 1 online resource (231 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of South Dakota, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

This dissertation examines select key factors that influence voter choices in state trial court judicial elections in three large, cosmopolitan counties in California and Texas. These include ballot designations (i.e., professional titles of candidates), "evaluations" of candidates by local bar associations, newspaper endorsements, political party affiliation, and gender. Focus here is on ballot designations and local bar association evaluations; the subjective opinions issued by local bar associations as official-sounding, objective and qualitative evaluations. In turn, local bar associations are private, voluntary associations consisting of fee-paying members and not overseeing state bar associations as many laypeople believe. Judicial elections remain low-information, low-participation, and low-saliency affairs. Local bar associations do little to correct the misunderstanding that exists around the true nature of their "evaluations." Additionally, California operates with a disparity in its ballot designation-related election law as this features different rules for government and non-government attorneys running for office. While Texas judicial elections are partisan, this is not the case in California. Accordingly, California voters may have to rely on a narrower set of heuristics in voting unless they are political sophisticates. This is often not the case. The present research results show that ballot designations and bar association evaluations have a significant impact on the outcome of judicial elections at the trial court level in the three counties examined: Los Angeles and San Francisco counties in California and Harris County, Texas (the greater Houston area). Each of these factors can make the difference between an election win and loss. Together, their effect presents statically significant evidence of voter influencing by powerful private, associations and positive state law in the areas examined. These concerns and others presented in this dissertation run afoul of American notions of democracy, transparency, and equality under the law. If the goal in the judicial election context in the areas examined and possible elsewhere is to optimize the quality of justice by seating the most qualified and least biased judges on the bench and to protect democratic and other minorities through inclusive governance, the sum of the answer is that judicial elections are fatally flawed.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798379518332Subjects--Topical Terms:

562473
Public administration.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Bar associationsIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Voter Influencing in State Trial Court Judicial Elections in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Houston.
LDR:03868ntm a22004097 4500 001 1143298
005 20240517100358.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798379518332
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30316995
035 $a AAI30316995
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Dellinger, Myanna. $3 1467938
245 1 0 $a Voter Influencing in State Trial Court Judicial Elections in Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Houston.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (231 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-11, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Earnest, David C.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of South Dakota, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This dissertation examines select key factors that influence voter choices in state trial court judicial elections in three large, cosmopolitan counties in California and Texas. These include ballot designations (i.e., professional titles of candidates), "evaluations" of candidates by local bar associations, newspaper endorsements, political party affiliation, and gender. Focus here is on ballot designations and local bar association evaluations; the subjective opinions issued by local bar associations as official-sounding, objective and qualitative evaluations. In turn, local bar associations are private, voluntary associations consisting of fee-paying members and not overseeing state bar associations as many laypeople believe. Judicial elections remain low-information, low-participation, and low-saliency affairs. Local bar associations do little to correct the misunderstanding that exists around the true nature of their "evaluations." Additionally, California operates with a disparity in its ballot designation-related election law as this features different rules for government and non-government attorneys running for office. While Texas judicial elections are partisan, this is not the case in California. Accordingly, California voters may have to rely on a narrower set of heuristics in voting unless they are political sophisticates. This is often not the case. The present research results show that ballot designations and bar association evaluations have a significant impact on the outcome of judicial elections at the trial court level in the three counties examined: Los Angeles and San Francisco counties in California and Harris County, Texas (the greater Houston area). Each of these factors can make the difference between an election win and loss. Together, their effect presents statically significant evidence of voter influencing by powerful private, associations and positive state law in the areas examined. These concerns and others presented in this dissertation run afoul of American notions of democracy, transparency, and equality under the law. If the goal in the judicial election context in the areas examined and possible elsewhere is to optimize the quality of justice by seating the most qualified and least biased judges on the bench and to protect democratic and other minorities through inclusive governance, the sum of the answer is that judicial elections are fatally flawed.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Public administration. $3 562473
650 4 $a Political science. $3 558774
650 4 $a Law. $3 671705
653 $a Bar associations
653 $a California
653 $a Election law
653 $a Judicial appointments
653 $a Judicial elections
653 $a Voter influencing
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0615
690 $a 0398
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of South Dakota. $b Political Science. $3 1189833
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-11A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30316995 $z click for full text (PQDT)