國立虎尾科技大學 |

The role of trust as a mediator between system characteristics and response behaviors.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The role of trust as a mediator between system characteristics and response behaviors./
Author:	Chancey, Eric T.
Description:	1 online resource (117 pages)
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 75-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International75-03.
Subject:	Experimental psychology. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781303166266

The role of trust as a mediator between system characteristics and response behaviors.
Chancey, Eric T.

The role of trust as a mediator between system characteristics and response behaviors. - 1 online resource (117 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 75-03.

Thesis (M.S.)--Old Dominion University, 2013.

Includes bibliographical references

There have been several theoretical frameworks that acknowledge trust as a prime mediator between system characteristics and automation reliance. Some researchers have operationally defined trust as the behavior exhibited. Other researchers have suggested that although trust may guide operator response behaviors, trust does not completely determine the behavior and advocate the use of subjective measures of trust. Recently, several studies accounting for temporal precedence failed to confirm that trust mediated the relationship between system characteristics and response behavior. The purpose of the current work was to clarify the roles that trust plays in response behavior when interacting with a signaling system. Forty-four participants interacted with a primary flight simulation task and a secondary signaling system task. The signaling system varied in reliability (90% and 60%) within subjects and error bias (false alarm prone and miss prone) between subjects. Analyses indicated that trust partially mediated the relationship between reliability and agreement rate. Trust did not, however, mediate the relationship between reliability and reaction time. Trust also did not mediate the relationships between error bias and reaction time or agreement rate. Analyses of variance generally supported specific behavioral and trust hypotheses, indicating that the paradigm employed produced similar effects on response behaviors and subjective estimates of trust observed in other studies. The results of this study indicate that other mediating variables may offer more predictive power in determining response behaviors. Additionally, strong assumptions of trust acting as the prime mediator and operationally defining trust as a type of behavior should be viewed with caution.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781303166266Subjects--Topical Terms:

1180476
Experimental psychology.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

The role of trust as a mediator between system characteristics and response behaviors.
LDR:02994ntm a22003257 4500 001 1143945
005 20240531084150.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2013 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781303166266
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI1522987
035 $a AAI1522987
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Chancey, Eric T. $3 1468770
245 1 4 $a The role of trust as a mediator between system characteristics and response behaviors.
264 0 $c 2013
300 $a 1 online resource (117 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 75-03.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Bliss, James P.
502 $a Thesis (M.S.)--Old Dominion University, 2013.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a There have been several theoretical frameworks that acknowledge trust as a prime mediator between system characteristics and automation reliance. Some researchers have operationally defined trust as the behavior exhibited. Other researchers have suggested that although trust may guide operator response behaviors, trust does not completely determine the behavior and advocate the use of subjective measures of trust. Recently, several studies accounting for temporal precedence failed to confirm that trust mediated the relationship between system characteristics and response behavior. The purpose of the current work was to clarify the roles that trust plays in response behavior when interacting with a signaling system. Forty-four participants interacted with a primary flight simulation task and a secondary signaling system task. The signaling system varied in reliability (90% and 60%) within subjects and error bias (false alarm prone and miss prone) between subjects. Analyses indicated that trust partially mediated the relationship between reliability and agreement rate. Trust did not, however, mediate the relationship between reliability and reaction time. Trust also did not mediate the relationships between error bias and reaction time or agreement rate. Analyses of variance generally supported specific behavioral and trust hypotheses, indicating that the paradigm employed produced similar effects on response behaviors and subjective estimates of trust observed in other studies. The results of this study indicate that other mediating variables may offer more predictive power in determining response behaviors. Additionally, strong assumptions of trust acting as the prime mediator and operationally defining trust as a type of behavior should be viewed with caution.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Experimental psychology. $3 1180476
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0623
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Old Dominion University. $3 1184212
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 75-03.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=1522987 $z click for full text (PQDT)