國立虎尾科技大學 |

Aristotelian justice and health policy : = Capability and incompletely theorized agreements.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Aristotelian justice and health policy :/
Reminder of title:	Capability and incompletely theorized agreements.
Author:	Ruger, Jennifer Prah.
Description:	1 online resource (139 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 60-02, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International60-02A.
Subject:	Public administration. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780591856002

Aristotelian justice and health policy : = Capability and incompletely theorized agreements.
Ruger, Jennifer Prah.

Aristotelian justice and health policy :Capability and incompletely theorized agreements. - 1 online resource (139 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 60-02, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Harvard University, 1998.

Includes bibliographical references

The dissertation Aristotelian Justice and Health Policy: Capability and Incompletely Theorized Agreements (advisors: Amartya Sen (chair), Jerry Green, and Joseph Newhouse) focuses on the implications for health policy of Aristotelian/Capability lines of reasoning to social justice and efficiency. The monograph draws on philosophical and economic analysis and social choice theory in the examination of health capabilities as: (i) a central focal variable for the assessment of equality and efficiency in health policy; (ii) the product of health and other public policies; and (iii) the object of social choice. Drawing on moral and political philosophy, the Aristotelian/Capability lines of reasoning provide the basis for the special moral importance of health capabilities as the central focal variable for assessing equality and efficiency in health policy. These lines of thought take a universal view of humans' capability to flourish as an end of political activity and provide an analytical framework to address questions of justice and efficiency in public policy in a way that other philosophical schools do not. Drawing on economic analysis, the monograph makes a case for focusing attention in health economics and health policy on the economics of health, per se, as differentiated from the economics of medical care, and as such emphasizes the analysis of empirical evidence on the instrumental effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the various determinants of health and the public policies associated with these determinants. Further investigations of the determinants and consequences of variations in health capabilities is necessary to fully understand the patterns and public policies associated with health production. And finally, drawing on social choice literature, this monograph identifies and defends a particular approach to collective decision making in public policy--incompletely theorized agreements (ICTA). In matters of social decision making about health capabilities in health policy, the ICTA framework is particularly useful and complementary to the capability approach. Health, and thus health capabilities, is a multidimensional concept about which different people have different, and sometimes conflicting, views. Since no unique view of health capabilities exists and is ideal for all evaluative purposes, the pragmatism of both the incomplete ordering of the capability approach and the incompletely theorized agreement on that ordering of the ICTA approach allow for reasoned public policy decision making and analysis in particular situations in the face of plural goods and different, even conflicting, views.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780591856002Subjects--Topical Terms:

562473
Public administration.
Subjects--Index Terms:

social choiceIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Aristotelian justice and health policy : = Capability and incompletely theorized agreements.
LDR:03980ntm a22003737 4500 001 1147165
005 20240909062233.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s1998 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780591856002
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI9832480
035 $a AAI9832480
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Ruger, Jennifer Prah. $3 1472824
245 1 0 $a Aristotelian justice and health policy : $b Capability and incompletely theorized agreements.
264 0 $c 1998
300 $a 1 online resource (139 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 60-02, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Sen, Amartya.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Harvard University, 1998.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The dissertation Aristotelian Justice and Health Policy: Capability and Incompletely Theorized Agreements (advisors: Amartya Sen (chair), Jerry Green, and Joseph Newhouse) focuses on the implications for health policy of Aristotelian/Capability lines of reasoning to social justice and efficiency. The monograph draws on philosophical and economic analysis and social choice theory in the examination of health capabilities as: (i) a central focal variable for the assessment of equality and efficiency in health policy; (ii) the product of health and other public policies; and (iii) the object of social choice. Drawing on moral and political philosophy, the Aristotelian/Capability lines of reasoning provide the basis for the special moral importance of health capabilities as the central focal variable for assessing equality and efficiency in health policy. These lines of thought take a universal view of humans' capability to flourish as an end of political activity and provide an analytical framework to address questions of justice and efficiency in public policy in a way that other philosophical schools do not. Drawing on economic analysis, the monograph makes a case for focusing attention in health economics and health policy on the economics of health, per se, as differentiated from the economics of medical care, and as such emphasizes the analysis of empirical evidence on the instrumental effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the various determinants of health and the public policies associated with these determinants. Further investigations of the determinants and consequences of variations in health capabilities is necessary to fully understand the patterns and public policies associated with health production. And finally, drawing on social choice literature, this monograph identifies and defends a particular approach to collective decision making in public policy--incompletely theorized agreements (ICTA). In matters of social decision making about health capabilities in health policy, the ICTA framework is particularly useful and complementary to the capability approach. Health, and thus health capabilities, is a multidimensional concept about which different people have different, and sometimes conflicting, views. Since no unique view of health capabilities exists and is ideal for all evaluative purposes, the pragmatism of both the incomplete ordering of the capability approach and the incompletely theorized agreement on that ordering of the ICTA approach allow for reasoned public policy decision making and analysis in particular situations in the face of plural goods and different, even conflicting, views.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Public administration. $3 562473
650 4 $a Philosophy. $3 559771
650 4 $a Public health. $3 560998
653 $a social choice
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0617
690 $a 0422
690 $a 0501
690 $a 0573
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Harvard University. $3 1180437
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 60-02A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9832480 $z click for full text (PQDT)