國立虎尾科技大學 |

Methods for Comparative Effectiveness Research with Real World Data.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Methods for Comparative Effectiveness Research with Real World Data./
Author:	Harton, Joanna Grace.
Description:	1 online resource (95 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-02B.
Subject:	Biostatistics. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798837502576

Methods for Comparative Effectiveness Research with Real World Data.
Harton, Joanna Grace.

Methods for Comparative Effectiveness Research with Real World Data. - 1 online resource (95 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

Electronic health records (EHR) contain a wealth of information that can potentially be used for research. EHR is particularly valuable for accelerating comparative effectiveness research, which seeks to estimate the relative benefit of alternative treatments in real-world settings. However there are also many challenges and limitations to conducting research with EHR-derived data, including measurement error, systematic differences between EHR and trial populations, and differential quantity and quality of data available across patients. In this dissertation, we first investigate the performance of several methods for mitigating bias due to measurement error applied to propensity scores created from error-prone covariates and provide recommendations for which methods to use in certain scenarios. Next, we develop a method to augment a randomized clinical trial with EHR data in order to create a hybrid control arm. This new method, data-adaptive-weighting, has promising properties when compared to more standard methods as well as another more recent propensity score-based method. Finally, we investigate the scenario of informed presence bias in longitudinal data, which arises when some subjects have more information in the EHR than others based on their intensity of utilization. We extend current work and explore several scenarios in which adjusting for biomarker values obtained at both pre-scheduled and patient-initiated visits in order to determine when there is risk of bias. For each topic we applied alternative methods to real-world EHR-derived data to demonstrate practical implications of alternative approaches in realistic settings.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798837502576Subjects--Topical Terms:

783654
Biostatistics.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Electronic health recordsIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Methods for Comparative Effectiveness Research with Real World Data.
LDR:02967ntm a22003617 4500 001 1147196
005 20240909100721.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798837502576
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI28968307
035 $a AAI28968307
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Harton, Joanna Grace. $3 1472860
245 1 0 $a Methods for Comparative Effectiveness Research with Real World Data.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (95 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Hubbard, Rebecca A.;Mitra, Nandita.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Electronic health records (EHR) contain a wealth of information that can potentially be used for research. EHR is particularly valuable for accelerating comparative effectiveness research, which seeks to estimate the relative benefit of alternative treatments in real-world settings. However there are also many challenges and limitations to conducting research with EHR-derived data, including measurement error, systematic differences between EHR and trial populations, and differential quantity and quality of data available across patients. In this dissertation, we first investigate the performance of several methods for mitigating bias due to measurement error applied to propensity scores created from error-prone covariates and provide recommendations for which methods to use in certain scenarios. Next, we develop a method to augment a randomized clinical trial with EHR data in order to create a hybrid control arm. This new method, data-adaptive-weighting, has promising properties when compared to more standard methods as well as another more recent propensity score-based method. Finally, we investigate the scenario of informed presence bias in longitudinal data, which arises when some subjects have more information in the EHR than others based on their intensity of utilization. We extend current work and explore several scenarios in which adjusting for biomarker values obtained at both pre-scheduled and patient-initiated visits in order to determine when there is risk of bias. For each topic we applied alternative methods to real-world EHR-derived data to demonstrate practical implications of alternative approaches in realistic settings.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Biostatistics. $3 783654
650 4 $a Information science. $3 561178
653 $a Electronic health records
653 $a Research
653 $a Real world data
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0308
690 $a 0723
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of Pennsylvania. $b Mathematics. $3 1180478
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-02B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=28968307 $z click for full text (PQDT)