國立虎尾科技大學 |

Performance of Different Cellular Phone Applications for Color Measurement of Dental Materials.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Performance of Different Cellular Phone Applications for Color Measurement of Dental Materials./
Author:	Dang, Anh Duong.
Description:	1 online resource (69 pages)
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International85-01.
Subject:	Dentistry. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798379779115

Performance of Different Cellular Phone Applications for Color Measurement of Dental Materials.
Dang, Anh Duong.

Performance of Different Cellular Phone Applications for Color Measurement of Dental Materials. - 1 online resource (69 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01.

Thesis (M.Sc.D.)--The University of Texas School of Dentistry at Houston, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

OBJECTIVE: To assess the repeatability and reliability of various color measuring applications for mobile phone on dental materials in clinically relevant shades and thicknesses.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A benchtop spectrophotometer (X-Rite Ci7600) was used as a reference instrument. Seven mobile phone applications were used: Color Analysis, Color Analyzer - Iro Shirabe, Color Grab, and Colorimeter from Android, and Color Analyzer - Iro Shirabe, ColorMeter RGB, and Optishade from iOS. Color measurements were performed using VITA ENAMIC shades 1M2, 2M2, 3M2, 4M2 and VITABLOCS Mark II shades A1C, A2C, A3C, A4C (n=10, for a total 80 specimens). There were three color measurement times, on Day 0, Day 1, and Day 7, to mimic short-, medium-, and long-term repeatability. The differences in color were analyzed using the CIEDE2000 formula and the corresponding color difference (ΔE00), and mean color difference from the mean (MCDM00) method. One-way ANOVA, Repeated measures ANOVA, and Paired sample t-test were employed for statistical analysis.RESULTS: Spectrophotometer consistently demonstrated the lowest mean differences by day (ΔE00 = 0.1 at Day 0, 1 and 7) and pairs of days (ΔE00 = 0.2, 0.1, and 0.2 for Days 0-1, 0-7, and 1-7, respectively), while other applications exhibited worse repeatability and reliability. iOS Optishade showed the lowest mean color difference among the applications (ΔE00 = 0.2, 0.3, 0.2 at Day 0, 1 and 7, respectively, and ΔE00 = 0.5 for Days 0-1, 0-7, and 1-7). Material-dependent variations were observed.CONCLUSIONS: There was a statistically significant difference among color measurements using cellular phone applications and a spectrophotometer, among the applications and materials. Spectrophotometer exhibited the lowest mean color differences, demonstrating highest repeatability and stability across the tested time periods. iOS Optishade showed the lowest mean color differences among the applications, yet significantly different as compared with spectrophotometer.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798379779115Subjects--Topical Terms:

674038
Dentistry.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Cellular phone applicationsIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Performance of Different Cellular Phone Applications for Color Measurement of Dental Materials.
LDR:03476ntm a22004097 4500 001 1149343
005 20241015112520.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798379779115
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30566935
035 $a AAI30566935
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Dang, Anh Duong. $3 1475534
245 1 0 $a Performance of Different Cellular Phone Applications for Color Measurement of Dental Materials.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (69 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01.
500 $a Advisor: Paravina, Rade;Gonzalez, Maria D.
502 $a Thesis (M.Sc.D.)--The University of Texas School of Dentistry at Houston, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a OBJECTIVE: To assess the repeatability and reliability of various color measuring applications for mobile phone on dental materials in clinically relevant shades and thicknesses.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A benchtop spectrophotometer (X-Rite Ci7600) was used as a reference instrument. Seven mobile phone applications were used: Color Analysis, Color Analyzer - Iro Shirabe, Color Grab, and Colorimeter from Android, and Color Analyzer - Iro Shirabe, ColorMeter RGB, and Optishade from iOS. Color measurements were performed using VITA ENAMIC shades 1M2, 2M2, 3M2, 4M2 and VITABLOCS Mark II shades A1C, A2C, A3C, A4C (n=10, for a total 80 specimens). There were three color measurement times, on Day 0, Day 1, and Day 7, to mimic short-, medium-, and long-term repeatability. The differences in color were analyzed using the CIEDE2000 formula and the corresponding color difference (ΔE00), and mean color difference from the mean (MCDM00) method. One-way ANOVA, Repeated measures ANOVA, and Paired sample t-test were employed for statistical analysis.RESULTS: Spectrophotometer consistently demonstrated the lowest mean differences by day (ΔE00 = 0.1 at Day 0, 1 and 7) and pairs of days (ΔE00 = 0.2, 0.1, and 0.2 for Days 0-1, 0-7, and 1-7, respectively), while other applications exhibited worse repeatability and reliability. iOS Optishade showed the lowest mean color difference among the applications (ΔE00 = 0.2, 0.3, 0.2 at Day 0, 1 and 7, respectively, and ΔE00 = 0.5 for Days 0-1, 0-7, and 1-7). Material-dependent variations were observed.CONCLUSIONS: There was a statistically significant difference among color measurements using cellular phone applications and a spectrophotometer, among the applications and materials. Spectrophotometer exhibited the lowest mean color differences, demonstrating highest repeatability and stability across the tested time periods. iOS Optishade showed the lowest mean color differences among the applications, yet significantly different as compared with spectrophotometer.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Dentistry. $3 674038
650 4 $a Biomedical engineering. $3 588770
650 4 $a Health sciences. $3 1179212
653 $a Cellular phone applications
653 $a Color measurement
653 $a Dental materials
653 $a Optishade
653 $a Repeatability
653 $a Spectrophotometer
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0567
690 $a 0566
690 $a 0541
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a The University of Texas School of Dentistry at Houston. $b Prosthodontics. $3 1475535
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 85-01.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30566935 $z click for full text (PQDT)