國立虎尾科技大學 |

Reactions to Different Framings of Inequality and Bias.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Reactions to Different Framings of Inequality and Bias./
Author:	Brown, Riana M.
Description:	1 online resource (205 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-01B.
Subject:	Social psychology. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798379773601

Reactions to Different Framings of Inequality and Bias.
Brown, Riana M.

Reactions to Different Framings of Inequality and Bias. - 1 online resource (205 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--New York University, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

The first paper in my dissertation package, on which I am first author, is an empirical paper published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin with Maureen Craig titled, "Intergroup Inequality Heightens Reports of Discrimination along Alternative Identity Dimensions". The second paper in the package, on which I am first author, is an empirical paper published in Journal of Experimental Social Psychology with Maureen Craig and Even Apfelbaum titled, "European Americans' Intentions to Confront Racial Bias: Considering Who, What (Kind), and Why". Finally, the third paper in the package, on which I share-first authorship with Pia Dietze, is an unpublished empirical paper with Maureen Craig titled, "Highlighting Health Consequences of Racial Disparities Sparks Support for Action".My Dissertation aims to investigate how different framings of inequality and bias affect support for social change at different levels, assessing intrapersonal, interpersonal, and societal-level outcomes. Specifically, I examine reactions to evidence of inequality and bias emphasizing different information, such as how inequality affects the advantaged (vs. the disadvantaged) or the health consequences (vs. economic or belonging consequences). I further assess how these framings may affect intrapersonal concerns, such as highlighting one's own experience of discrimination, interpersonal experiences, such as supporting confrontation of perpetrators of bias, and societal-level outcomes, such as supporting engagement in collective action to reduce inequality. My first paper investigates how framing inequality as ingroup advantage, outgroup disadvantage, or without relevant inequality information leads people to highlight their discrimination in other domains. My second paper explores whether people support confronting people implementing biased policies and institutional practices (i.e., structural bias) vs. people expressing prejudicial attitudes (i.e., interpersonal bias) and whether the perpetrator was a friend or stranger. The third paper tests if reading about health-related disparities, relative to disparities in other domains, leads to more support for action (e.g., likelihood to engage in collective action to reduce inequality) because health-related disparities are perceived as more morally sacred, and thus, more unjust. Overall, this work highlights how different information about inequality uniquely affects how people react to inequality and support social change, emphasizing how people may highlight their own experiences of injustice, may seek to confront individual perpetrators, or may seek to engage in efforts to spark social change.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798379773601Subjects--Topical Terms:

554804
Social psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

BiasIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Reactions to Different Framings of Inequality and Bias.
LDR:03995ntm a22003977 4500 001 1152706
005 20241213095536.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798379773601
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30247481
035 $a AAI30247481
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Brown, Riana M. $3 1479779
245 1 0 $a Reactions to Different Framings of Inequality and Bias.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (205 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Craig, Maureen A.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--New York University, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The first paper in my dissertation package, on which I am first author, is an empirical paper published in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin with Maureen Craig titled, "Intergroup Inequality Heightens Reports of Discrimination along Alternative Identity Dimensions". The second paper in the package, on which I am first author, is an empirical paper published in Journal of Experimental Social Psychology with Maureen Craig and Even Apfelbaum titled, "European Americans' Intentions to Confront Racial Bias: Considering Who, What (Kind), and Why". Finally, the third paper in the package, on which I share-first authorship with Pia Dietze, is an unpublished empirical paper with Maureen Craig titled, "Highlighting Health Consequences of Racial Disparities Sparks Support for Action".My Dissertation aims to investigate how different framings of inequality and bias affect support for social change at different levels, assessing intrapersonal, interpersonal, and societal-level outcomes. Specifically, I examine reactions to evidence of inequality and bias emphasizing different information, such as how inequality affects the advantaged (vs. the disadvantaged) or the health consequences (vs. economic or belonging consequences). I further assess how these framings may affect intrapersonal concerns, such as highlighting one's own experience of discrimination, interpersonal experiences, such as supporting confrontation of perpetrators of bias, and societal-level outcomes, such as supporting engagement in collective action to reduce inequality. My first paper investigates how framing inequality as ingroup advantage, outgroup disadvantage, or without relevant inequality information leads people to highlight their discrimination in other domains. My second paper explores whether people support confronting people implementing biased policies and institutional practices (i.e., structural bias) vs. people expressing prejudicial attitudes (i.e., interpersonal bias) and whether the perpetrator was a friend or stranger. The third paper tests if reading about health-related disparities, relative to disparities in other domains, leads to more support for action (e.g., likelihood to engage in collective action to reduce inequality) because health-related disparities are perceived as more morally sacred, and thus, more unjust. Overall, this work highlights how different information about inequality uniquely affects how people react to inequality and support social change, emphasizing how people may highlight their own experiences of injustice, may seek to confront individual perpetrators, or may seek to engage in efforts to spark social change.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 554804
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 555998
650 4 $a Experimental psychology. $3 1180476
653 $a Bias
653 $a Framing
653 $a Inequality
653 $a Intergroup relations
653 $a Social change
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0623
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a New York University. $b Psychology. $3 1183858
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-01B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30247481 $z click for full text (PQDT)