國立虎尾科技大學 |

3D of Racial Justice Diversity, Dominance & Discrimination : = Implicit Dominance & the Diversity Principle-Policy Gap.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	3D of Racial Justice Diversity, Dominance & Discrimination :/
Reminder of title:	Implicit Dominance & the Diversity Principle-Policy Gap.
Author:	Hurd, Kyneshawau.
Description:	1 online resource (151 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-03B.
Subject:	Social psychology. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798384431978

3D of Racial Justice Diversity, Dominance & Discrimination : = Implicit Dominance & the Diversity Principle-Policy Gap.
Hurd, Kyneshawau.

3D of Racial Justice Diversity, Dominance & Discrimination :Implicit Dominance & the Diversity Principle-Policy Gap. - 1 online resource (151 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2024.

Includes bibliographical references

In a societal context that professes egalitarian ideals yet remains deeply entrenched in racial hierarchies, this dissertation introduces and develops the 3D framework-Diversity, Dominance, and Discrimination-to critically examine how seemingly egalitarian diversity ideologies, practices and decisions may work to preserve the very inequalities they purport to address. By creating this novel framework, the work centers the subtle and often unseen forces that sustain racial dominance, though not the ones most commonly thought of, like implicit bias. Rather, this framework centers group-based dominance as the foundational source of discrimination.At the heart of this investigation is the development and application of the first-ever measure of implicit social dominance orientation (ISDO), a subconscious preference for maintaining group-based hierarchies. The dissertation is structured around three empirical papers. The first paper in this collection validates this groundbreaking measure, uncovering its role in explaining why those who outwardly reject dominance might still support policies that perpetuate racial inequities. The second paper applies the 3D model to the venture capital sector, revealing how contractual control terms, far from empowering Black founders, can bind them in ways that maintain racial hierarchies even when Black founders receive investment. The third paper delves deeper into the investment decisions of venture capitalists, exploring how implicit dominance subtly shapes assessments of risk and allocation of control rights.Together, these papers paint a picture of a diversity paradigm that, when focused solely on instrumental representation, may appeal to implicit dominance motivations and therefore operating to reinforce the very power structures it seeks to challenge. By critically analyzing the role of implicit social dominance orientation (ISDO) and its intersection with diversity ideology, this dissertation calls for a fundamental shift in how we approach racial justice-moving beyond the surface of DEI initiatives to confront the underlying dynamics of power and dominance that sustain inequality. In doing so, it offers a more nuanced and robust pathway toward true equity, urging a reevaluation of the frameworks that guide our efforts in law, policy, and beyond.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798384431978Subjects--Topical Terms:

554804
Social psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

DiscriminationIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

3D of Racial Justice Diversity, Dominance & Discrimination : = Implicit Dominance & the Diversity Principle-Policy Gap.
LDR:03767ntm a22004097 4500 001 1152789
005 20241213095601.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2024 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798384431978
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31555762
035 $a AAI31555762
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Hurd, Kyneshawau. $3 1479877
245 1 0 $a 3D of Racial Justice Diversity, Dominance & Discrimination : $b Implicit Dominance & the Diversity Principle-Policy Gap.
264 0 $c 2024
300 $a 1 online resource (151 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-03, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Plaut, Victoria.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of California, Berkeley, 2024.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a In a societal context that professes egalitarian ideals yet remains deeply entrenched in racial hierarchies, this dissertation introduces and develops the 3D framework-Diversity, Dominance, and Discrimination-to critically examine how seemingly egalitarian diversity ideologies, practices and decisions may work to preserve the very inequalities they purport to address. By creating this novel framework, the work centers the subtle and often unseen forces that sustain racial dominance, though not the ones most commonly thought of, like implicit bias. Rather, this framework centers group-based dominance as the foundational source of discrimination.At the heart of this investigation is the development and application of the first-ever measure of implicit social dominance orientation (ISDO), a subconscious preference for maintaining group-based hierarchies. The dissertation is structured around three empirical papers. The first paper in this collection validates this groundbreaking measure, uncovering its role in explaining why those who outwardly reject dominance might still support policies that perpetuate racial inequities. The second paper applies the 3D model to the venture capital sector, revealing how contractual control terms, far from empowering Black founders, can bind them in ways that maintain racial hierarchies even when Black founders receive investment. The third paper delves deeper into the investment decisions of venture capitalists, exploring how implicit dominance subtly shapes assessments of risk and allocation of control rights.Together, these papers paint a picture of a diversity paradigm that, when focused solely on instrumental representation, may appeal to implicit dominance motivations and therefore operating to reinforce the very power structures it seeks to challenge. By critically analyzing the role of implicit social dominance orientation (ISDO) and its intersection with diversity ideology, this dissertation calls for a fundamental shift in how we approach racial justice-moving beyond the surface of DEI initiatives to confront the underlying dynamics of power and dominance that sustain inequality. In doing so, it offers a more nuanced and robust pathway toward true equity, urging a reevaluation of the frameworks that guide our efforts in law, policy, and beyond.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 554804
650 4 $a Law. $3 671705
650 4 $a Black studies. $3 1180118
650 4 $a Public policy. $3 1002398
653 $a Discrimination
653 $a Diversity
653 $a Implicit social dominance
653 $a PBJ
653 $a Principle-policy gap
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0398
690 $a 0630
690 $a 0325
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of California, Berkeley. $b Jurisprudence & Social Policy. $3 1471307
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-03B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31555762 $z click for full text (PQDT)