國立虎尾科技大學 |

Looking for Bias in All the Right Places : = Incentive-Driven Optimism and Pessimism.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Looking for Bias in All the Right Places :/
Reminder of title:	Incentive-Driven Optimism and Pessimism.
Author:	Wheeler, Nathan.
Description:	1 online resource (182 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-05, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International86-05B.
Subject:	Social psychology. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798342756334

Looking for Bias in All the Right Places : = Incentive-Driven Optimism and Pessimism.
Wheeler, Nathan.

Looking for Bias in All the Right Places :Incentive-Driven Optimism and Pessimism. - 1 online resource (182 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-05, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2024.

Includes bibliographical references

What motivates people to choose biased evidence over more accurate sources? Psychological models of motivated information search have typically explained this by appealing to specific directional motives such as the desire to preserve self-esteem (Beauregard & Dunning, 1998) or signal ingroup membership (Flynn et al., 2017). Although this proliferation of directional accounts helps highlight specific incentives (e.g., self-enhancement, social pressure) that may motivate individuals to prefer biased information, what's missing is a more general understanding of how any large possible incentive might lead people to prefer biased information in the first place. My thesis offers a parsimonious model of how the mere possibility of any large reward or loss might lead people to prefer biased information through three general processes- a "rational" account in which people prefer biased information based on the increased reward or mitigated losses that can be gained from acting on that information; a trust-based account in which people prefer biased information because trusting it leads to better consequences, and a congeniality bias account in which people prefer biased information because it justifies their belief in how they should act. In chapter 2, I formalize each of these processes and highlight how each predicts that the possibility of large incentives should moderate preference for biased information, such that the possibility of large rewards for making correct decisions would increase preference for optimistic information, while the possibility of large losses for making incorrect decisions would increase preference for pessimistic information. In chapter 3, I provide empirical demonstration of this moderation in three studies. Finally, in chapter 4, I show in a final study how all three of these processes can significantly account for individual differences in biased information search. Together, this work demonstrates that the mere presence of large incentives can lead to preference for biased information through three general motivational processes. Thus, even in lieu of more specific directional accounts of an individual's motivations, biased information search can be understood through knowledge of the consequences an individual stands to face by acting on that information.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798342756334Subjects--Topical Terms:

554804
Social psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

BiasIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Looking for Bias in All the Right Places : = Incentive-Driven Optimism and Pessimism.
LDR:03746ntm a22004217 4500 001 1152791
005 20241213095601.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2024 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798342756334
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI31556916
035 $a AAI31556916
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Wheeler, Nathan. $3 1479879
245 1 0 $a Looking for Bias in All the Right Places : $b Incentive-Driven Optimism and Pessimism.
264 0 $c 2024
300 $a 1 online resource (182 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 86-05, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Cunningham, William.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Toronto (Canada), 2024.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a What motivates people to choose biased evidence over more accurate sources? Psychological models of motivated information search have typically explained this by appealing to specific directional motives such as the desire to preserve self-esteem (Beauregard & Dunning, 1998) or signal ingroup membership (Flynn et al., 2017). Although this proliferation of directional accounts helps highlight specific incentives (e.g., self-enhancement, social pressure) that may motivate individuals to prefer biased information, what's missing is a more general understanding of how any large possible incentive might lead people to prefer biased information in the first place. My thesis offers a parsimonious model of how the mere possibility of any large reward or loss might lead people to prefer biased information through three general processes- a "rational" account in which people prefer biased information based on the increased reward or mitigated losses that can be gained from acting on that information; a trust-based account in which people prefer biased information because trusting it leads to better consequences, and a congeniality bias account in which people prefer biased information because it justifies their belief in how they should act. In chapter 2, I formalize each of these processes and highlight how each predicts that the possibility of large incentives should moderate preference for biased information, such that the possibility of large rewards for making correct decisions would increase preference for optimistic information, while the possibility of large losses for making incorrect decisions would increase preference for pessimistic information. In chapter 3, I provide empirical demonstration of this moderation in three studies. Finally, in chapter 4, I show in a final study how all three of these processes can significantly account for individual differences in biased information search. Together, this work demonstrates that the mere presence of large incentives can lead to preference for biased information through three general motivational processes. Thus, even in lieu of more specific directional accounts of an individual's motivations, biased information search can be understood through knowledge of the consequences an individual stands to face by acting on that information.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 554804
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 1179418
650 4 $a Psychology. $3 555998
650 4 $a Personality psychology. $3 1180475
653 $a Bias
653 $a Decision making
653 $a Motivated reasoning
653 $a Optimism
653 $a Pessimism
653 $a Wishful thinking
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0451
690 $a 0384
690 $a 0621
690 $a 0625
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of Toronto (Canada). $b Psychology. $3 1181492
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 86-05B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31556916 $z click for full text (PQDT)