國立虎尾科技大學 |

The Promise and Peril of AI Technology for Writing Instruction: An Exploratory Study on Stakeholder Attitudes Toward Using AI Tools in a University First-Year Writing Program /

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The Promise and Peril of AI Technology for Writing Instruction: An Exploratory Study on Stakeholder Attitudes Toward Using AI Tools in a University First-Year Writing Program // Ahmet Emre Keser.
Author:	Keser, Ahmet Emre,
Description:	1 electronic resource (182 pages)
Notes:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International85-12.
Subject:	English as a second language. -
Online resource:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31140894
ISBN:	9798382813417

The Promise and Peril of AI Technology for Writing Instruction: An Exploratory Study on Stakeholder Attitudes Toward Using AI Tools in a University First-Year Writing Program /
Keser, Ahmet Emre,

The Promise and Peril of AI Technology for Writing Instruction: An Exploratory Study on Stakeholder Attitudes Toward Using AI Tools in a University First-Year Writing Program /Ahmet Emre Keser. - 1 electronic resource (182 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12.

This thesis investigates what the stakeholders of a university First-Year Writing (FYW) program in the United States (US) think about the potential advantages and disadvantages of the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools in composition and language learning in college-level practices. To sound out the key players of the college-level writing process, and to get their opinions, an online survey with a request for a follow-up interview was distributed to the members of the FYW program of a large public university in the US, consisting of students taking English composition courses, instructors of these courses, writing center tutors, and staff working in this program (N = 120). Through a mixed-method approach, the quantitative data from survey results were analyzed via Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Then, thematic analyses of the follow-up interview responses (N = 4) were added to the data analysis after they were transcribed via Otter.ai, an AI-powered transcription tool. The findings showed that the majority of the stakeholders have a positive or neutral attitude toward the use of AI tools rather than a negative stance. Also, it can be inferred from the data there is a slight difference between the domestic and international stakeholders in terms of their overall familiarity with AI tools. Also, the diverse perspectives of stakeholders offer insights on the future implications and the potential integration of AI tools into FYW and L2 writing instruction practices.

English

ISBN: 9798382813417Subjects--Topical Terms:

1148422
English as a second language.
Subjects--Index Terms:

First-Year Writing programs

The Promise and Peril of AI Technology for Writing Instruction: An Exploratory Study on Stakeholder Attitudes Toward Using AI Tools in a University First-Year Writing Program /
LDR:03107nam a22004453i 4500 001 1157750
005 20250603111407.5
006 m o d
007 cr|nu||||||||
008 250804s2024 miu||||||m |||||||eng d
020 $a 9798382813417
035 $a (MiAaPQD)AAI31140894
035 $a AAI31140894
040 $a MiAaPQD $b eng $c MiAaPQD $e rda
100 1 $a Keser, Ahmet Emre, $e author. $3 1484014
245 1 0 $a The Promise and Peril of AI Technology for Writing Instruction: An Exploratory Study on Stakeholder Attitudes Toward Using AI Tools in a University First-Year Writing Program / $c Ahmet Emre Keser.
264 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2024
300 $a 1 electronic resource (182 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12.
500 $a Advisors: Poole, Robert Committee members: Selvi, Ali Fuad; Koronkiewicz, Bryan.
502 $b M.A. $c The University of Alabama $d 2024.
520 $a This thesis investigates what the stakeholders of a university First-Year Writing (FYW) program in the United States (US) think about the potential advantages and disadvantages of the use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools in composition and language learning in college-level practices. To sound out the key players of the college-level writing process, and to get their opinions, an online survey with a request for a follow-up interview was distributed to the members of the FYW program of a large public university in the US, consisting of students taking English composition courses, instructors of these courses, writing center tutors, and staff working in this program (N = 120). Through a mixed-method approach, the quantitative data from survey results were analyzed via Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Then, thematic analyses of the follow-up interview responses (N = 4) were added to the data analysis after they were transcribed via Otter.ai, an AI-powered transcription tool. The findings showed that the majority of the stakeholders have a positive or neutral attitude toward the use of AI tools rather than a negative stance. Also, it can be inferred from the data there is a slight difference between the domestic and international stakeholders in terms of their overall familiarity with AI tools. Also, the diverse perspectives of stakeholders offer insights on the future implications and the potential integration of AI tools into FYW and L2 writing instruction practices.
546 $a English
590 $a School code: 0004
650 4 $a English as a second language. $3 1148422
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 557829
650 4 $a Higher education. $3 1148448
653 $a First-Year Writing programs
653 $a Generative AI
653 $a Second language writing
653 $a Stakeholder perceptions
653 $a Text generation
690 $a 0441
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0745
690 $a 0800
710 2 $a The University of Alabama. $b English as a Second Language. $e degree granting institution. $3 1484015
720 1 $a Poole, Robert $e degree supervisor.
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 85-12.
790 $a 0004
791 $a M.A.
792 $a 2024
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=31140894