國立虎尾科技大學 |

The EU accession to the ECHR = between Luxembourg's search for autonomy and Strasbourg's credibility on human rights protection /

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The EU accession to the ECHR/ by Fisnik Korenica.
Reminder of title:	between Luxembourg's search for autonomy and Strasbourg's credibility on human rights protection /
Author:	Korenica, Fisnik.
Published:	Cham :Springer International Publishing : : 2015.,
Description:	xix, 471 p. :ill. (some col.), digital ; : 24 cm.;
Contained By:	Springer eBooks
Subject:	Human rights - European Union countries. -
Online resource:	http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21759-8
ISBN:	9783319217598

The EU accession to the ECHR = between Luxembourg's search for autonomy and Strasbourg's credibility on human rights protection /
Korenica, Fisnik.

The EU accession to the ECHRbetween Luxembourg's search for autonomy and Strasbourg's credibility on human rights protection /[electronic resource] :by Fisnik Korenica. - Cham :Springer International Publishing :2015. - xix, 471 p. :ill. (some col.), digital ;24 cm.

Part I: The EU as a Sui Generis Human Rights Law Organization: Situating the Roots of the Accession Question: 1. Introduction to the Book -- 2. EU Becoming a Human Rights Law Organization: Starting from Nowhere with a 'Gouvernment des Juges' -- 3. EU Law Autonomy: Where Does the Viewpoint for 'Competition' of Luxembourg Start from? -- Part II: The Draft Accession Agreement of the EU Accession to the ECHR: an Examination of the Central Mechanisms in Light of EU Law Peculiarities -- 4. A New Start for the Accession of the EU to the ECHR -- 5. Status of ECHR and DAA in EU Legal Order -- 6. Attribution of Liability Under the Co-respondent Mechanism -- 7. Inter-Party Mechanism and the EU: Possible Implications from the Strasbourg's Jurisdiction? -- 8. EU Prior Involvement Review -- Part III: A Strasbourg Perspective on Applications of EU Law Origin -- 9. Testing the Co-respondent Mechanism from the Strasbourg Court Perspective: Three Distinctive Cases with Three Distinctive Scenarios -- 10. Admissibility Before the Strasbourg Court: An Outlook on the EU Law Originated Applications -- Part IV: Approaching the Final 'Station' -- 11. Before the Conclusion: Luxembourg Court's Opinion 2/13 on the DAA's Compatibility with the EU Treaties -- 12. An Overall Conclusion.

This book examines the EU accession to the ECHR from a systemic perspective as well as from the specific perspective of the 2013 draft accession agreement negotiated between the relevant body of the Council of Europe and the EU Commission. It mainly follows a legal positivist approach to examining the nature and scope of obligations that will regulate the new relationship between EU law and European Convention on Human Rights law, concentrating specifically on the issue of jurisdictional interface between the Strasbourg and Luxembourg courts. The book offers an in-depth examination of the core mechanisms of the draft accession agreement, taking into account the remarks in Luxembourg's Opinion 2/13, focusing especially on the issue of attribution of responsibility when a violation of ECHR has been jointly committed by the EU and its Member States, the inter-party procedure and the prior involvement mechanism. The work basically argues that EU accession to the ECHR will have a constitutional impact on the EU legal order, and may also have certain implications for the jurisdictional interface between the Strasbourg and Luxembourg courts. It also questions the mode of interaction between some normative aspects of ECHR law and EU law, offering certain arguments as to the interaction between the Charter of Fundamental Rights and ECHR from overlapping and accommodative perspectives post-accession. The book concludes that with the EU accession to the ECHR - as it stands right now with the draft accession agreement - the macro relationship between the Strasbourg and Luxembourg courts will change significantly, while their constitutional roles will become vertically accommodated and better specialized.

ISBN: 9783319217598

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-21759-8doiSubjects--Uniform Titles:

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
(1950)Subjects--Topical Terms:

869197
Human rights
--European Union countries.

LC Class. No.: KJE5132

Dewey Class. No.: 342.4085

The EU accession to the ECHR = between Luxembourg's search for autonomy and Strasbourg's credibility on human rights protection /
LDR:04028nam a2200313 a 4500 001 837247
003 DE-He213
005 20160310171455.0
006 m d
007 cr nn 008maaau
008 160421s2015 gw s 0 eng d
020 $a 9783319217598 $q (electronic bk.)
020 $a 9783319217581 $q (paper)
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-21759-8 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-21759-8
040 $a GP $c GP
041 0 $a eng
050 4 $a KJE5132
072 7 $a LB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
082 0 4 $a 342.4085 $2 23
090 $a KJE5132 $b .K84 2015
100 1 $a Korenica, Fisnik. $3 1067924
245 1 4 $a The EU accession to the ECHR $h [electronic resource] : $b between Luxembourg's search for autonomy and Strasbourg's credibility on human rights protection / $c by Fisnik Korenica.
260 $a Cham : $c 2015. $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer,
300 $a xix, 471 p. : $b ill. (some col.), digital ; $c 24 cm.
505 0 $a Part I: The EU as a Sui Generis Human Rights Law Organization: Situating the Roots of the Accession Question: 1. Introduction to the Book -- 2. EU Becoming a Human Rights Law Organization: Starting from Nowhere with a 'Gouvernment des Juges' -- 3. EU Law Autonomy: Where Does the Viewpoint for 'Competition' of Luxembourg Start from? -- Part II: The Draft Accession Agreement of the EU Accession to the ECHR: an Examination of the Central Mechanisms in Light of EU Law Peculiarities -- 4. A New Start for the Accession of the EU to the ECHR -- 5. Status of ECHR and DAA in EU Legal Order -- 6. Attribution of Liability Under the Co-respondent Mechanism -- 7. Inter-Party Mechanism and the EU: Possible Implications from the Strasbourg's Jurisdiction? -- 8. EU Prior Involvement Review -- Part III: A Strasbourg Perspective on Applications of EU Law Origin -- 9. Testing the Co-respondent Mechanism from the Strasbourg Court Perspective: Three Distinctive Cases with Three Distinctive Scenarios -- 10. Admissibility Before the Strasbourg Court: An Outlook on the EU Law Originated Applications -- Part IV: Approaching the Final 'Station' -- 11. Before the Conclusion: Luxembourg Court's Opinion 2/13 on the DAA's Compatibility with the EU Treaties -- 12. An Overall Conclusion.
520 $a This book examines the EU accession to the ECHR from a systemic perspective as well as from the specific perspective of the 2013 draft accession agreement negotiated between the relevant body of the Council of Europe and the EU Commission. It mainly follows a legal positivist approach to examining the nature and scope of obligations that will regulate the new relationship between EU law and European Convention on Human Rights law, concentrating specifically on the issue of jurisdictional interface between the Strasbourg and Luxembourg courts. The book offers an in-depth examination of the core mechanisms of the draft accession agreement, taking into account the remarks in Luxembourg's Opinion 2/13, focusing especially on the issue of attribution of responsibility when a violation of ECHR has been jointly committed by the EU and its Member States, the inter-party procedure and the prior involvement mechanism. The work basically argues that EU accession to the ECHR will have a constitutional impact on the EU legal order, and may also have certain implications for the jurisdictional interface between the Strasbourg and Luxembourg courts. It also questions the mode of interaction between some normative aspects of ECHR law and EU law, offering certain arguments as to the interaction between the Charter of Fundamental Rights and ECHR from overlapping and accommodative perspectives post-accession. The book concludes that with the EU accession to the ECHR - as it stands right now with the draft accession agreement - the macro relationship between the Strasbourg and Luxembourg courts will change significantly, while their constitutional roles will become vertically accommodated and better specialized.
630 0 0 $a Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms $d (1950) $3 869358
650 0 $a Human rights $z European Union countries. $3 869197
650 1 4 $a Law. $3 671705
650 2 4 $a European Law. $3 883672
650 2 4 $a Sources and Subjects of International Law, International Organizations. $3 885568
650 2 4 $a Human Rights. $3 883254
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer eBooks
856 4 0 $u http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21759-8
950 $a Humanities, Social Sciences and Law (Springer-11648)