國立虎尾科技大學 |

Investor Communication and the Benefits of Cross-Listing.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Investor Communication and the Benefits of Cross-Listing./
Author:	Reiter, Nayana.
Description:	1 online resource (86 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-04A(E).
Subject:	Business administration. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355366471

Investor Communication and the Benefits of Cross-Listing.
Reiter, Nayana.

Investor Communication and the Benefits of Cross-Listing. - 1 online resource (86 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)

Includes bibliographical references

A large body of literature finds that cross-listing is associated with capital market benefits. However, evidence also suggests that these benefits are mostly temporary. In this paper, I investigate whether communication with U.S. investors helps non-U.S. firms maintain the capital market benefits of U.S. listings. I find that investor communication mitigates the post cross-listing decline in valuation documented by prior studies. I also find that communication choices explain variation in the valuation, cost of capital and stock liquidity of cross-listed firms in the long run. These results are robust to concerns about potential self-selection bias and are stronger for firms from countries with lower corruption risk and fewer cultural differences from U.S. culture. Lastly, I compare the valuation of cross-listed and non-cross-listed firms. My findings suggest that a significant portion of the cross-listing valuation premium is associated with the investor communication practices of these firms. Firms that cross-list in the U.S. but do not communicate with U.S. investors are not valued at a premium relative to non-cross-listed firms from the same country. Overall, my results are consistent with investor communication being an important condition for firms to maintain the long-run benefits of cross-listing.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355366471Subjects--Topical Terms:

1148568
Business administration.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Investor Communication and the Benefits of Cross-Listing.
LDR:02582ntm a2200337Ki 4500 001 910068
005 20180511093034.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355366471
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10670393
035 $a (MiAaPQ)umichrackham:000910
035 $a AAI10670393
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
099 $a TUL $f hyy $c available through World Wide Web
100 1 $a Reiter, Nayana. $3 1181142
245 1 0 $a Investor Communication and the Benefits of Cross-Listing.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (86 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Gregory Smith Miller.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.) $c University of Michigan $d 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a A large body of literature finds that cross-listing is associated with capital market benefits. However, evidence also suggests that these benefits are mostly temporary. In this paper, I investigate whether communication with U.S. investors helps non-U.S. firms maintain the capital market benefits of U.S. listings. I find that investor communication mitigates the post cross-listing decline in valuation documented by prior studies. I also find that communication choices explain variation in the valuation, cost of capital and stock liquidity of cross-listed firms in the long run. These results are robust to concerns about potential self-selection bias and are stronger for firms from countries with lower corruption risk and fewer cultural differences from U.S. culture. Lastly, I compare the valuation of cross-listed and non-cross-listed firms. My findings suggest that a significant portion of the cross-listing valuation premium is associated with the investor communication practices of these firms. Firms that cross-list in the U.S. but do not communicate with U.S. investors are not valued at a premium relative to non-cross-listed firms from the same country. Overall, my results are consistent with investor communication being an important condition for firms to maintain the long-run benefits of cross-listing.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Business administration. $3 1148568
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0310
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of Michigan. $b Business Administration. $3 1181140
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-04A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10670393 $z click for full text (PQDT)