Language:
English
繁體中文
Help
Login
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
The Effect of Different Alphabets in...
~
The Florida State University.
The Effect of Different Alphabets in Lexical Processing : = The Case of Russian.
Record Type:
Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
The Effect of Different Alphabets in Lexical Processing :/
Reminder of title:
The Case of Russian.
Author:
Usmanova, Emiliya R.
Description:
1 online resource (76 pages)
Notes:
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-05.
Contained By:
Masters Abstracts International56-05(E).
Subject:
Linguistics. -
Online resource:
click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9781369864632
The Effect of Different Alphabets in Lexical Processing : = The Case of Russian.
Usmanova, Emiliya R.
The Effect of Different Alphabets in Lexical Processing :
The Case of Russian. - 1 online resource (76 pages)
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-05.
Thesis (M.A.)
Includes bibliographical references
In the field of psycholinguistics, many studies have provided evidence for non-selectivity of various sub-lexical and lexical units both in same-alphabet bilingualism and in language combinations with different scripts (Dijkstra, Grainger & Van Heuven,1998). Majority of previous studies tested the predictions of the word recognition models, BIA and BIA+, mostly based on same script language combinations (Schwarts, Kroll & Diaz, 2007; Comesana et.al.. 2012) .
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9781369864632Subjects--Topical Terms:
557829
Linguistics.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:
554714
Electronic books.
The Effect of Different Alphabets in Lexical Processing : = The Case of Russian.
LDR
:03073ntm a2200373Ki 4500
001
911815
005
20180531103647.5
006
m o u
007
cr mn||||a|a||
008
190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9781369864632
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10265662
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)fsu:13901
035
$a
AAI10265662
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
099
$a
TUL
$f
hyy
$c
available through World Wide Web
100
1
$a
Usmanova, Emiliya R.
$3
1183878
245
1 4
$a
The Effect of Different Alphabets in Lexical Processing :
$b
The Case of Russian.
264
0
$c
2017
300
$a
1 online resource (76 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-05.
500
$a
Adviser: Gretchen L. Sunderman.
502
$a
Thesis (M.A.)
$c
The Florida State University
$d
2017.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
In the field of psycholinguistics, many studies have provided evidence for non-selectivity of various sub-lexical and lexical units both in same-alphabet bilingualism and in language combinations with different scripts (Dijkstra, Grainger & Van Heuven,1998). Majority of previous studies tested the predictions of the word recognition models, BIA and BIA+, mostly based on same script language combinations (Schwarts, Kroll & Diaz, 2007; Comesana et.al.. 2012) .
520
$a
The goal of this paper is to test the prediction of the BIA+ model and investigate the architecture of mental lexicon in different script bilinguals, particularly with native speakers of English - late language learners of Russian. The nature of non-selective interaction of codes in English-Russian combination has not been studied yet, and we do not know if the co-activation of features takes place only due to phonological similarity or complex orthographic and phonological overlap between two alphabets. Following the example of many studies, cognate pairs were chosen as the stimuli for the proposed masked priming experiment.
520
$a
The design of this empirical study replicates to a certain degree Sunderman and Priya (2012), and Voga and Grainger (2007). There are six experimental conditions based on phoneme and grapheme overlap. The idea of the planned experiment is to measure reaction times and accuracy rates in visual and auditory trials to investigate the order of activation. It is predicted that facilitation effect will take place with cognates sharing similarity in phonology, orthography, and meaning, while in cognate pairs with false overlap and in distractor pairs the participants will demonstrate the most difficulty and delay in their responses due to simultaneous activation of features.
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2018
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
Linguistics.
$3
557829
650
4
$a
Psychology.
$3
555998
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
local
$3
554714
690
$a
0290
690
$a
0621
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
1178819
710
2
$a
The Florida State University.
$b
Modern Languages.
$3
1183879
773
0
$t
Masters Abstracts International
$g
56-05(E).
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10265662
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
based on 0 review(s)
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login