國立虎尾科技大學 |

The Impact of Verifiability on the Reliability of Fair Value Estimates : = Evidence from the Level 3 Rollforward Disclosure.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The Impact of Verifiability on the Reliability of Fair Value Estimates :/
Reminder of title:	Evidence from the Level 3 Rollforward Disclosure.
Author:	Curtis, Remington T.
Description:	1 online resource (68 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-09A(E).
Subject:	Accounting. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355954784

The Impact of Verifiability on the Reliability of Fair Value Estimates : = Evidence from the Level 3 Rollforward Disclosure.
Curtis, Remington T.

The Impact of Verifiability on the Reliability of Fair Value Estimates :Evidence from the Level 3 Rollforward Disclosure. - 1 online resource (68 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2018.

Includes bibliographical references

Using hand-collected data from the Level 3 reconciliation disclosure, I study the impact of verifiability on the perceived reliability of changes to fair value estimates. Using a value relevance framework, I find that investors perceive indirectly verifiable changes to Level 3 fair value holdings as less reliable than directly verifiable Level 3 changes. I next show that, consistent with a Bayesian updating framework, the value relevance of indirectly verifiable changes is moderated by the overstatement of prior fair value estimates, and by the recency of the investment's acquisition. My study provides new insights on how investors price fair value estimates and also contributes some of the first empirical evidence on the positive relation between the enhancing qualitative characteristic verifiability and investor perceptions of the reliability of information. Relatedly, my study highlights the difference between verifiability and the ASC 820 characteristic observability and finds that observability does not capture investor perceptions of reliability. Finally, the results of my study contradict recent claims that the ASC 820 disclosures are uninformative.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355954784Subjects--Topical Terms:

561166
Accounting.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

The Impact of Verifiability on the Reliability of Fair Value Estimates : = Evidence from the Level 3 Rollforward Disclosure.
LDR:02433ntm a2200325Ki 4500 001 917126
005 20181005115848.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2018 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355954784
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10791838
035 $a (MiAaPQ)arizona:16176
035 $a AAI10791838
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Curtis, Remington T. $3 1191069
245 1 4 $a The Impact of Verifiability on the Reliability of Fair Value Estimates : $b Evidence from the Level 3 Rollforward Disclosure.
264 0 $c 2018
300 $a 1 online resource (68 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Jayanthi Sunder.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Arizona, 2018.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Using hand-collected data from the Level 3 reconciliation disclosure, I study the impact of verifiability on the perceived reliability of changes to fair value estimates. Using a value relevance framework, I find that investors perceive indirectly verifiable changes to Level 3 fair value holdings as less reliable than directly verifiable Level 3 changes. I next show that, consistent with a Bayesian updating framework, the value relevance of indirectly verifiable changes is moderated by the overstatement of prior fair value estimates, and by the recency of the investment's acquisition. My study provides new insights on how investors price fair value estimates and also contributes some of the first empirical evidence on the positive relation between the enhancing qualitative characteristic verifiability and investor perceptions of the reliability of information. Relatedly, my study highlights the difference between verifiability and the ASC 820 characteristic observability and finds that observability does not capture investor perceptions of reliability. Finally, the results of my study contradict recent claims that the ASC 820 disclosures are uninformative.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Accounting. $3 561166
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0272
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a The University of Arizona. $b Accounting. $3 1191070
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-09A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10791838 $z click for full text (PQDT)