國立虎尾科技大學 |

Teachers' Pedagogical Resistance to Prescribed Curriculum.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Teachers' Pedagogical Resistance to Prescribed Curriculum./
Author:	Owens, Darya.
Description:	1 online resource (179 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-03A(E).
Subject:	Special education. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355469233

Teachers' Pedagogical Resistance to Prescribed Curriculum.
Owens, Darya.

Teachers' Pedagogical Resistance to Prescribed Curriculum. - 1 online resource (179 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Wayne State University, 2017.

Includes bibliographical references

Research indicates that teachers feel intimidated into fully implementing prescribed literacy curriculum at the expense of their own praxis which may indeed be effective in boosting student literacy achievement. This perceived intimidation may serve to compromise students' literacy outcomes. The objective of the study was to recognize the different forms of resistance teachers demonstrate in order to take responsibility of their own pedagogical practices as it helps develop students' literacy skills. This paper analyzes teachers' praxis and use of integrated methods of prescribed literacy curriculum in relation to teacher resistance. It answers four key questions: 1) What forms of resistance to the prescribed literacy curriculum do teachers at this elementary school use? 2) Why do teachers use resistance? 3) What do teachers say are the implications of their resistance? 4) What are teachers' pedagogical choices in relation to resistance?

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355469233Subjects--Topical Terms:

567627
Special education.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Teachers' Pedagogical Resistance to Prescribed Curriculum.
LDR:03554ntm a2200373Ki 4500 001 918165
005 20181022132747.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355469233
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10599931
035 $a (MiAaPQ)wayne:13364
035 $a AAI10599931
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Owens, Darya. $3 1192413
245 1 0 $a Teachers' Pedagogical Resistance to Prescribed Curriculum.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (179 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Susan Gabel.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Wayne State University, 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Research indicates that teachers feel intimidated into fully implementing prescribed literacy curriculum at the expense of their own praxis which may indeed be effective in boosting student literacy achievement. This perceived intimidation may serve to compromise students' literacy outcomes. The objective of the study was to recognize the different forms of resistance teachers demonstrate in order to take responsibility of their own pedagogical practices as it helps develop students' literacy skills. This paper analyzes teachers' praxis and use of integrated methods of prescribed literacy curriculum in relation to teacher resistance. It answers four key questions: 1) What forms of resistance to the prescribed literacy curriculum do teachers at this elementary school use? 2) Why do teachers use resistance? 3) What do teachers say are the implications of their resistance? 4) What are teachers' pedagogical choices in relation to resistance?
520 $a The study gathered qualitative and qualitative data in order to detail the frequency with which teachers favor their praxis over prescribed literacy curriculum, and to address concepts such as culturally responsive teaching and social participation. The limitations inherent in the research are the lack of diversity among the 18 respondents interviewed (all of them white female teachers from a northeastern U.S. suburban school); and the possibility that respondents might be less than candid in their responses due to concerns about anonymity.
520 $a Most of the teachers reported that they felt teachers resist prescribed literacy curriculum by developing their own pedagogical practices within their classroom in order to feel responsible for developing students' literacy skills. At the same time, participants reported that they tended to completely follow prescribed literacy curriculum consistent with their professional development training. Teachers have strategically adjusted controlled academic environments to serve students, which implies a strategy of politicizing education within their classrooms. The long standing educational systems which were believed to promote education for the sake of preparing students for service jobs and consumerism are adjustable in classrooms where teachers promote students' social capital instead.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Special education. $3 567627
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 1148494
650 4 $a Pedagogy. $3 1148703
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0529
690 $a 0727
690 $a 0456
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Wayne State University. $b Special Education. $3 1192414
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-03A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10599931 $z click for full text (PQDT)