Language:
English
繁體中文
Help
Login
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
The Effects of Peer Monitoring on Ob...
~
Vassare, Bianca M.
The Effects of Peer Monitoring on Observational Stimulus Control in Preschoolers With and Without Social Delays; In-Vivo Versus Video and Learning Versus Performance.
Record Type:
Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
The Effects of Peer Monitoring on Observational Stimulus Control in Preschoolers With and Without Social Delays; In-Vivo Versus Video and Learning Versus Performance./
Author:
Vassare, Bianca M.
Description:
1 online resource (109 pages)
Notes:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-09(E), Section: B.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International78-09B(E).
Subject:
Behavioral sciences. -
Online resource:
click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9781369735796
The Effects of Peer Monitoring on Observational Stimulus Control in Preschoolers With and Without Social Delays; In-Vivo Versus Video and Learning Versus Performance.
Vassare, Bianca M.
The Effects of Peer Monitoring on Observational Stimulus Control in Preschoolers With and Without Social Delays; In-Vivo Versus Video and Learning Versus Performance.
- 1 online resource (109 pages)
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-09(E), Section: B.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2017.
Includes bibliographical references
Two experiments were conducted to test the effectiveness of a peer-monitoring procedure on the induction of observational learning and observational performance of preschoolers via a combined experimental-control group design with a "nested" multiple probe across participants design (Greer & Du, 2015; Greer, Stolfi, & Pistoljevic, 2007). Six participants in Experiment 1 were split into matched pairs; one participant in each pair was assigned to the in-vivo condition, and one assigned to the video condition. All were assessed on their correct responding to in-vivo observational learning and performance probes prior to and following the peer-monitoring intervention. The peer-monitoring intervention consisted of two stages; the first was a training stage, in which participants monitored responses of peer confederates that were previously in their repertoire, and the second stage required participants to monitor responses not in their repertoire. The results of Experiment 1 showed that five of the six participants demonstrated that they had observational performance following the intervention. However, the emergence of the observational learning capability was only found with participants originally assigned to the in-vivo intervention condition. Upon completing the intervention again, but in the in-vivo condition, all participants originally assigned to the video intervention condition did demonstrate observational learning. In Experiment 2, the same procedures were implemented, however the observational performance and learning pre-and post-intervention probes were conducted in both the video and in-vivo conditions. In addition, I also tested the effects of the peer-monitoring procedure on the emission of social contact in a free play setting between experimental conditions. The findings remained constant in Experiment 2; the video condition was not effective in inducing observational learning, but was for observational performance. Therefore, the peer-monitoring intervention led to the emergence of observational performance, but the presence of a peer audience was required in order for observational learning to emerge. Furthermore, participants originally assigned to the in-vivo condition emitted higher numbers of social contact in a free play setting than the participants originally assigned video condition.
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9781369735796Subjects--Topical Terms:
1148596
Behavioral sciences.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:
554714
Electronic books.
The Effects of Peer Monitoring on Observational Stimulus Control in Preschoolers With and Without Social Delays; In-Vivo Versus Video and Learning Versus Performance.
LDR
:03645ntm a2200325Ki 4500
001
918461
005
20181026115416.5
006
m o u
007
cr mn||||a|a||
008
190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9781369735796
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10275090
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)columbia:13953
035
$a
AAI10275090
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
$d
NTU
100
1
$a
Vassare, Bianca M.
$3
1192788
245
1 4
$a
The Effects of Peer Monitoring on Observational Stimulus Control in Preschoolers With and Without Social Delays; In-Vivo Versus Video and Learning Versus Performance.
264
0
$c
2017
300
$a
1 online resource (109 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-09(E), Section: B.
500
$a
Adviser: Jessica Dudek.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Columbia University, 2017.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
Two experiments were conducted to test the effectiveness of a peer-monitoring procedure on the induction of observational learning and observational performance of preschoolers via a combined experimental-control group design with a "nested" multiple probe across participants design (Greer & Du, 2015; Greer, Stolfi, & Pistoljevic, 2007). Six participants in Experiment 1 were split into matched pairs; one participant in each pair was assigned to the in-vivo condition, and one assigned to the video condition. All were assessed on their correct responding to in-vivo observational learning and performance probes prior to and following the peer-monitoring intervention. The peer-monitoring intervention consisted of two stages; the first was a training stage, in which participants monitored responses of peer confederates that were previously in their repertoire, and the second stage required participants to monitor responses not in their repertoire. The results of Experiment 1 showed that five of the six participants demonstrated that they had observational performance following the intervention. However, the emergence of the observational learning capability was only found with participants originally assigned to the in-vivo intervention condition. Upon completing the intervention again, but in the in-vivo condition, all participants originally assigned to the video intervention condition did demonstrate observational learning. In Experiment 2, the same procedures were implemented, however the observational performance and learning pre-and post-intervention probes were conducted in both the video and in-vivo conditions. In addition, I also tested the effects of the peer-monitoring procedure on the emission of social contact in a free play setting between experimental conditions. The findings remained constant in Experiment 2; the video condition was not effective in inducing observational learning, but was for observational performance. Therefore, the peer-monitoring intervention led to the emergence of observational performance, but the presence of a peer audience was required in order for observational learning to emerge. Furthermore, participants originally assigned to the in-vivo condition emitted higher numbers of social contact in a free play setting than the participants originally assigned video condition.
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2018
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
Behavioral sciences.
$3
1148596
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
local
$3
554714
690
$a
0602
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
1178819
710
2
$a
Columbia University.
$b
TC: Applied Behavioral Analysis.
$3
1179417
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
78-09B(E).
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10275090
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
based on 0 review(s)
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login