國立虎尾科技大學 |

The European Public Prosecutor’s Office = An extended arm or a Two-Headed dragon? /

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	The European Public Prosecutor’s Office/ edited by L. H. Erkelens, A.W.H. Meij, M. Pawlik.
Reminder of title:	An extended arm or a Two-Headed dragon? /
other author:	Erkelens, L. H.
Description:	X, 285 p. 1 illus. in color.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Law—Europe. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-035-0
ISBN:	9789462650350

The European Public Prosecutor’s Office = An extended arm or a Two-Headed dragon? /
The European Public Prosecutor’s OfficeAn extended arm or a Two-Headed dragon? /[electronic resource] :edited by L. H. Erkelens, A.W.H. Meij, M. Pawlik. - 1st ed. 2015. - X, 285 p. 1 illus. in color.online resource.

Introduction -- Presentation of the Commission’s proposal on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor's Office -- The Commission’s legislative proposal: an overview of its main characteristics -- Is the Commission proposal for a European Public Prosecutor's Office based on a harmonious interpretation of Articles 85 and 86 TFEU? -- Constitutional issues of multilevel prosecution by the European Public Prosecutor's Office from a Union perspective -- The European Public Prosecutor’s Office and Eurojust: ‘Love match or arranged marriage’? -- Some explorations into the EPPO’s administrative structure and judicial review -- Search and seizure measures and their review -- The choice of forum by the European Public Prosecutor -- Issues of conferral, subsidiarity and proportionality -- European Public Prosecution’s Office: A far from perfect proposal -- Establishing enhanced cooperation under Article 86 TFEU -- Implications of enhanced cooperation for the EPPO model and its functioning.

In July 2013 the European Commission launched its legislative proposal to create a European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO). The proposal provoked fierce debates, politically as well as on the academic level. Many national parliaments opposed and submitted formally their grievances to the Commission and negotiations on the proposal between Member States are ongoing. As early as September 2013, the T.M.C. Asser Instituut in The Hague, The Netherlands, held the first international conference on this unprecedented proposal. This book reflects the main results of that conference. It provides a concise background of and reasoning for the introduction of this new EU body entrusted with far reaching judicial powers disclosing important legal and policy implications. Within its hitherto limited scope, the existing system of judicial cooperation between EU Member States will change fundamentally, directly affecting the functioning of national courts and public prosecution offices. This book helps answering fundamental questions involved. It provides a solid basis for both academics and practitioners to further structure an EPPO, respecting the interests of all parties involved. At the time of writing and editing this volume, Leendert Erkelens and Arjen Meij were both Visiting Research Fellow at the T.M.C. Asser Instituut in The Hague, The Netherlands. Marta Pawlik was a Research Assistant in the same Institute. .

ISBN: 9789462650350

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-94-6265-035-0doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

1254279
Law—Europe.

LC Class. No.: KJE901-9796

Dewey Class. No.: 341.2422

The European Public Prosecutor’s Office = An extended arm or a Two-Headed dragon? /
LDR:03821nam a22003855i 4500 001 967658
003 DE-He213
005 20200919161217.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 201211s2015 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9789462650350 $9 978-94-6265-035-0
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-94-6265-035-0 $2 doi
035 $a 978-94-6265-035-0
050 4 $a KJE901-9796
072 7 $a LB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW051000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LB $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 341.2422 $2 23
245 1 4 $a The European Public Prosecutor’s Office $h [electronic resource] : $b An extended arm or a Two-Headed dragon? / $c edited by L. H. Erkelens, A.W.H. Meij, M. Pawlik.
250 $a 1st ed. 2015.
264 1 $a The Hague : $b T.M.C. Asser Press : $b Imprint: T.M.C. Asser Press, $c 2015.
300 $a X, 285 p. 1 illus. in color. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
505 0 $a Introduction -- Presentation of the Commission’s proposal on the establishment of the European Public Prosecutor's Office -- The Commission’s legislative proposal: an overview of its main characteristics -- Is the Commission proposal for a European Public Prosecutor's Office based on a harmonious interpretation of Articles 85 and 86 TFEU? -- Constitutional issues of multilevel prosecution by the European Public Prosecutor's Office from a Union perspective -- The European Public Prosecutor’s Office and Eurojust: ‘Love match or arranged marriage’? -- Some explorations into the EPPO’s administrative structure and judicial review -- Search and seizure measures and their review -- The choice of forum by the European Public Prosecutor -- Issues of conferral, subsidiarity and proportionality -- European Public Prosecution’s Office: A far from perfect proposal -- Establishing enhanced cooperation under Article 86 TFEU -- Implications of enhanced cooperation for the EPPO model and its functioning.
520 $a In July 2013 the European Commission launched its legislative proposal to create a European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO). The proposal provoked fierce debates, politically as well as on the academic level. Many national parliaments opposed and submitted formally their grievances to the Commission and negotiations on the proposal between Member States are ongoing. As early as September 2013, the T.M.C. Asser Instituut in The Hague, The Netherlands, held the first international conference on this unprecedented proposal. This book reflects the main results of that conference. It provides a concise background of and reasoning for the introduction of this new EU body entrusted with far reaching judicial powers disclosing important legal and policy implications. Within its hitherto limited scope, the existing system of judicial cooperation between EU Member States will change fundamentally, directly affecting the functioning of national courts and public prosecution offices. This book helps answering fundamental questions involved. It provides a solid basis for both academics and practitioners to further structure an EPPO, respecting the interests of all parties involved. At the time of writing and editing this volume, Leendert Erkelens and Arjen Meij were both Visiting Research Fellow at the T.M.C. Asser Instituut in The Hague, The Netherlands. Marta Pawlik was a Research Assistant in the same Institute. .
650 0 $a Law—Europe. $3 1254279
650 0 $a International criminal law. $3 784835
650 1 4 $a European Law. $3 883672
650 2 4 $a International Criminal Law . $3 1254000
700 1 $a Erkelens, L. H. $e editor. $4 edt $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt $3 1263311
700 1 $a Meij, A.W.H. $4 edt $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt $3 1062913
700 1 $a Pawlik, M. $4 edt $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/edt $3 1062914
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9789462650367
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9789462650343
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-035-0
912 $a ZDB-2-SHU
912 $a ZDB-2-SXLC
950 $a Humanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 $a Law and Criminology (R0) (SpringerNature-43727)