國立虎尾科技大學 |

Weighting Methods and their Effects on Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model Outcomes in Water Resources Management

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Weighting Methods and their Effects on Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model Outcomes in Water Resources Management/ by Noorul Hassan Zardari, Kamal Ahmed, Sharif Moniruzzaman Shirazi, Zulkifli Bin Yusop.
Author:	Zardari, Noorul Hassan.
other author:	Ahmed, Kamal.
Description:	XI, 166 p. 69 illus., 45 illus. in color.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Physical geography. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12586-2
ISBN:	9783319125862

Weighting Methods and their Effects on Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model Outcomes in Water Resources Management
Zardari, Noorul Hassan.

Weighting Methods and their Effects on Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model Outcomes in Water Resources Management[electronic resource] /by Noorul Hassan Zardari, Kamal Ahmed, Sharif Moniruzzaman Shirazi, Zulkifli Bin Yusop. - 1st ed. 2015. - XI, 166 p. 69 illus., 45 illus. in color.online resource. - SpringerBriefs in Water Science and Technology,2194-7244. - SpringerBriefs in Water Science and Technology,.

This book provides a systematic way of how to make better decisions in water resources management. The applications of three weighting methods namely rating, ranking, and ratio are discussed in this book. Additionally, data mining on keywords is presented using three popular scholarly databases: Science Direct, Scopus, and SciVerse. Four abbreviated keywords (MCDM, MCDA, MCA, MADM) representing multi-criteria decision-making were used and these three databases were searched for different popular weighting methods for a period of 13 years (2000-2012). The book provides also a review of weighting methods applied in various multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods and also presents survey results on priority ranking of watershed management criteria undertaken by 30 undergraduate and postgraduate students from the Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

ISBN: 9783319125862

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-12586-2doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

784466
Physical geography.

LC Class. No.: GB3-5030

Dewey Class. No.: 550

Weighting Methods and their Effects on Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model Outcomes in Water Resources Management
LDR:02418nam a22003975i 4500 001 968559
003 DE-He213
005 20200702083725.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 201211s2015 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783319125862 $9 978-3-319-12586-2
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-12586-2 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-12586-2
050 4 $a GB3-5030
072 7 $a RB $2 bicssc
072 7 $a SCI019000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a RB $2 thema
072 7 $a TQ $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 550 $2 23
100 1 $a Zardari, Noorul Hassan. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1063228
245 1 0 $a Weighting Methods and their Effects on Multi-Criteria Decision Making Model Outcomes in Water Resources Management $h [electronic resource] / $c by Noorul Hassan Zardari, Kamal Ahmed, Sharif Moniruzzaman Shirazi, Zulkifli Bin Yusop.
250 $a 1st ed. 2015.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2015.
300 $a XI, 166 p. 69 illus., 45 illus. in color. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a SpringerBriefs in Water Science and Technology, $x 2194-7244
520 $a This book provides a systematic way of how to make better decisions in water resources management. The applications of three weighting methods namely rating, ranking, and ratio are discussed in this book. Additionally, data mining on keywords is presented using three popular scholarly databases: Science Direct, Scopus, and SciVerse. Four abbreviated keywords (MCDM, MCDA, MCA, MADM) representing multi-criteria decision-making were used and these three databases were searched for different popular weighting methods for a period of 13 years (2000-2012). The book provides also a review of weighting methods applied in various multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods and also presents survey results on priority ranking of watershed management criteria undertaken by 30 undergraduate and postgraduate students from the Faculty of Civil Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.
650 0 $a Physical geography. $3 784466
650 0 $a Environmental management. $3 557131
650 0 $a Hydrogeology. $3 670389
650 1 4 $a Earth System Sciences. $3 882734
650 2 4 $a Water Policy/Water Governance/Water Management. $3 1019644
700 1 $a Ahmed, Kamal. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1264167
700 1 $a Shirazi, Sharif Moniruzzaman. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1264168
700 1 $a Yusop, Zulkifli Bin. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1264169
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319125879
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319125855
830 0 $a SpringerBriefs in Water Science and Technology, $x 2194-7244 $3 1261546
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12586-2
912 $a ZDB-2-EES
912 $a ZDB-2-SXEE
950 $a Earth and Environmental Science (SpringerNature-11646)
950 $a Earth and Environmental Science (R0) (SpringerNature-43711)