國立虎尾科技大學 |

Liability Rules in Patent Law = A Legal and Economic Analysis /

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Liability Rules in Patent Law/ by Daniel Krauspenhaar.
Reminder of title:	A Legal and Economic Analysis /
Author:	Krauspenhaar, Daniel.
Description:	XIX, 233 p. 10 illus. in color.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Mass media. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40900-4
ISBN:	9783642409004

Liability Rules in Patent Law = A Legal and Economic Analysis /
Krauspenhaar, Daniel.

Liability Rules in Patent LawA Legal and Economic Analysis /[electronic resource] :by Daniel Krauspenhaar. - 1st ed. 2015. - XIX, 233 p. 10 illus. in color.online resource. - Munich Studies on Innovation and Competition,12199-7462 ;. - Munich Studies on Innovation and Competition,3.

Introductory Remarks -- Overuse of Exclusivity in Patent Law -- Private Liability Rule Regimes -- Compulsory Liability Rule and Liability Rule by Default Regimes -- Overall View and Conclusion.

The primary purpose of a patent law system should be to enhance economic efficiency, in particular by providing incentives for making inventions. The conventional wisdom is that patents should therefore be strictly exclusive rights. Moreover, in practice patent owners are almost never forced to give up their right to exclude others and receive only a certain amount of remuneration with, for instance, compulsory licensing. Other economically interesting patent-law objectives, however, include the transfer and dissemination of knowledge. Mechanisms exist by which the patent owner decides if he or she would prefer exclusive or non-exclusive rights, for instance the opportunity to declare the willingness to license and create patent pools. But it is questionable whether these mechanisms are sufficient and efficient enough in view of the existence of patent trolls and other problems. This work challenges the conventional wisdom to a certain extent and makes proposals for improvements.

ISBN: 9783642409004

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-642-40900-4doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

556421
Mass media.

LC Class. No.: K4240-4343

Dewey Class. No.: 343.099

Liability Rules in Patent Law = A Legal and Economic Analysis /
LDR:02643nam a22004095i 4500 001 970097
003 DE-He213
005 20200920094648.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 201211s2015 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783642409004 $9 978-3-642-40900-4
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-642-40900-4 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-642-40900-4
050 4 $a K4240-4343
072 7 $a LNJ $2 bicssc
072 7 $a LAW000000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a LNJ $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 343.099 $2 23
100 1 $a Krauspenhaar, Daniel. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1063421
245 1 0 $a Liability Rules in Patent Law $h [electronic resource] : $b A Legal and Economic Analysis / $c by Daniel Krauspenhaar.
250 $a 1st ed. 2015.
264 1 $a Berlin, Heidelberg : $b Springer Berlin Heidelberg : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2015.
300 $a XIX, 233 p. 10 illus. in color. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a Munich Studies on Innovation and Competition, $x 2199-7462 ; $v 1
505 0 $a Introductory Remarks -- Overuse of Exclusivity in Patent Law -- Private Liability Rule Regimes -- Compulsory Liability Rule and Liability Rule by Default Regimes -- Overall View and Conclusion.
520 $a The primary purpose of a patent law system should be to enhance economic efficiency, in particular by providing incentives for making inventions. The conventional wisdom is that patents should therefore be strictly exclusive rights. Moreover, in practice patent owners are almost never forced to give up their right to exclude others and receive only a certain amount of remuneration with, for instance, compulsory licensing. Other economically interesting patent-law objectives, however, include the transfer and dissemination of knowledge. Mechanisms exist by which the patent owner decides if he or she would prefer exclusive or non-exclusive rights, for instance the opportunity to declare the willingness to license and create patent pools. But it is questionable whether these mechanisms are sufficient and efficient enough in view of the existence of patent trolls and other problems. This work challenges the conventional wisdom to a certain extent and makes proposals for improvements.
650 0 $a Mass media. $3 556421
650 0 $a Law. $3 671705
650 0 $a Law and economics. $3 560301
650 1 4 $a IT Law, Media Law, Intellectual Property. $3 1209939
650 2 4 $a Law and Economics. $3 669261
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783642409011
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783642408991
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783662524893
830 0 $a Munich Studies on Innovation and Competition, $x 2199-7462 ; $v 3 $3 1261210
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40900-4
912 $a ZDB-2-SHU
912 $a ZDB-2-SXLC
950 $a Humanities, Social Sciences and Law (SpringerNature-11648)
950 $a Law and Criminology (R0) (SpringerNature-43727)