國立虎尾科技大學 |

Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts = Reframing Participatory Spatial Planning /

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts/ by Emanuela Saporito.
Reminder of title:	Reframing Participatory Spatial Planning /
Author:	Saporito, Emanuela.
Description:	XV, 105 p. 6 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Urban geography. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30829-6
ISBN:	9783319308296

Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts = Reframing Participatory Spatial Planning /
Saporito, Emanuela.

Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable ConflictsReframing Participatory Spatial Planning /[electronic resource] :by Emanuela Saporito. - 1st ed. 2016. - XV, 105 p. 6 illus.online resource. - PoliMI SpringerBriefs,2282-2577. - PoliMI SpringerBriefs,.

New challenges for participatory approaches in spatial planning -- Looking for a way out: three groups of theories -- the controversial story of PII Isola in Milan -- What happened in practice? Looking inside "black boxes" -- How to reframe participative spatial planning: some critical reflections -- Index.

This book aims to identify ways of overcoming the limitations of the communicative tradition in understanding participatory spatial planning. Three conceptual models that offer different perspectives on public and civic participation in complex urban planning processes are presented and reviewed: the consensual model, which conceives of planning as a collective decision-making practice geared toward consensus building and conflict resolution; the conflictual model, which views planning as a social mobilization practice addressed at empowerment of marginalized groups; and the trading zone model, which reframes collaborative planning as a coordination activity with respect to practical proposals in the presence of unstable and conflicting rationalities and values. The controversial story of the Integrated Intervention Program “PII Isola Lunetta” in Milan is examined through the interpretative lenses of these models, with detailed interpretation of how each model performs in the field. The book concludes by offering critical reflections on the reframing of participatory spatial planning, highlighting the value of trading zones/trading languages and boundary objects as tools for understanding and addressing collaborative practices in complex and conflictual urban planning processes.

ISBN: 9783319308296

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-319-30829-6doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

560488
Urban geography.

LC Class. No.: GF125

Dewey Class. No.: 307.76

Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts = Reframing Participatory Spatial Planning /
LDR:03002nam a22003975i 4500 001 974187
003 DE-He213
005 20200706025131.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 201211s2016 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783319308296 $9 978-3-319-30829-6
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-319-30829-6 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-319-30829-6
050 4 $a GF125
072 7 $a RPC $2 bicssc
072 7 $a SCI030000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a RPC $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 307.76 $2 23
100 1 $a Saporito, Emanuela. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1110116
245 1 0 $a Consensus Building Versus Irreconcilable Conflicts $h [electronic resource] : $b Reframing Participatory Spatial Planning / $c by Emanuela Saporito.
250 $a 1st ed. 2016.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2016.
300 $a XV, 105 p. 6 illus. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a PoliMI SpringerBriefs, $x 2282-2577
505 0 $a New challenges for participatory approaches in spatial planning -- Looking for a way out: three groups of theories -- the controversial story of PII Isola in Milan -- What happened in practice? Looking inside "black boxes" -- How to reframe participative spatial planning: some critical reflections -- Index.
520 $a This book aims to identify ways of overcoming the limitations of the communicative tradition in understanding participatory spatial planning. Three conceptual models that offer different perspectives on public and civic participation in complex urban planning processes are presented and reviewed: the consensual model, which conceives of planning as a collective decision-making practice geared toward consensus building and conflict resolution; the conflictual model, which views planning as a social mobilization practice addressed at empowerment of marginalized groups; and the trading zone model, which reframes collaborative planning as a coordination activity with respect to practical proposals in the presence of unstable and conflicting rationalities and values. The controversial story of the Integrated Intervention Program “PII Isola Lunetta” in Milan is examined through the interpretative lenses of these models, with detailed interpretation of how each model performs in the field. The book concludes by offering critical reflections on the reframing of participatory spatial planning, highlighting the value of trading zones/trading languages and boundary objects as tools for understanding and addressing collaborative practices in complex and conflictual urban planning processes.
650 0 $a Urban geography. $3 560488
650 0 $a Operations research. $3 573517
650 0 $a Decision making. $3 528319
650 0 $a Environmental management. $3 557131
650 1 4 $a Urban Geography / Urbanism (inc. megacities, cities, towns). $3 1066410
650 2 4 $a Operations Research/Decision Theory. $3 669176
650 2 4 $a Environmental Management. $3 593900
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319308272
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783319308289
830 0 $a PoliMI SpringerBriefs, $x 2282-2577 $3 1254671
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30829-6
912 $a ZDB-2-EES
912 $a ZDB-2-SXEE
950 $a Earth and Environmental Science (SpringerNature-11646)
950 $a Earth and Environmental Science (R0) (SpringerNature-43711)