國立虎尾科技大學 |

Cohesion and Fragmentation in Social Movements = How Frames and Identities Shape the Belo Monte Conflict /

Record Type:	Language materials, printed : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Cohesion and Fragmentation in Social Movements / by Ina Peters.
Reminder of title:	How Frames and Identities Shape the Belo Monte Conflict /
Author:	Peters, Ina.
Description:	XVI, 277 p. 4 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
Subject:	Political science. -
Online resource:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19326-3
ISBN:	9783658193263

Cohesion and Fragmentation in Social Movements = How Frames and Identities Shape the Belo Monte Conflict /
Peters, Ina.

Cohesion and Fragmentation in Social Movements How Frames and Identities Shape the Belo Monte Conflict /[electronic resource] :by Ina Peters. - 1st ed. 2018. - XVI, 277 p. 4 illus.online resource. - Bürgergesellschaft und Demokratie,2627-3195. - Bürgergesellschaft und Demokratie,44.

Ina Peters analyzes how collective identities and collective action frames have contributed to the persistence and eventual fragmentation of the collective action against the Belo Monte Dam. Reconstructing the rationale of the conflict, Ina Peters addresses theoretical research gaps regarding the dynamics – particularly cohesion and fragmentation – in social movements. The study considers the influence of the regional context and the applicability of Western theories in non-Western case studies. It is based on primary data that was collected through semistructured interviews and analyzed in detail by means of a combined top-down and bottom-up procedure based on the grounded theory methodology. Contents Social Movement Theory Grounded Theory Methodology Economic and environmental policy in the Brazilian Amazon Rationale of the Belo Monte conflict Traveling of theories and concepts Target Groups Researchers and students of Social Movement Research, Latin American Studies, and (Comparative) Area Studies Practitioners in the fields of environmental governance, sustainable development, and human rights The Author Ina Peters is head of research management at the Academy for Spatial Research and Planning (ARL). She was a research fellow at the GIGA Institute of Latin American Studies headed by Professor Detlef Nolte and a doctoral student of Professor Kai-Uwe Schnapp at Universität Hamburg. .

ISBN: 9783658193263

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-658-19326-3doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

558774
Political science.

LC Class. No.: JA1-92

Dewey Class. No.: 320

Cohesion and Fragmentation in Social Movements = How Frames and Identities Shape the Belo Monte Conflict /
LDR:02840nam a22003855i 4500 001 999254
003 DE-He213
005 20200704193559.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 201225s2018 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783658193263 $9 978-3-658-19326-3
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-658-19326-3 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-658-19326-3
050 4 $a JA1-92
072 7 $a JPA $2 bicssc
072 7 $a POL000000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JPA $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 320 $2 23
100 1 $a Peters, Ina. $e author. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 1290836
245 1 0 $a Cohesion and Fragmentation in Social Movements $h [electronic resource] : $b How Frames and Identities Shape the Belo Monte Conflict / $c by Ina Peters.
250 $a 1st ed. 2018.
264 1 $a Wiesbaden : $b Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden : $b Imprint: Springer VS, $c 2018.
300 $a XVI, 277 p. 4 illus. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a Bürgergesellschaft und Demokratie, $x 2627-3195
520 $a Ina Peters analyzes how collective identities and collective action frames have contributed to the persistence and eventual fragmentation of the collective action against the Belo Monte Dam. Reconstructing the rationale of the conflict, Ina Peters addresses theoretical research gaps regarding the dynamics – particularly cohesion and fragmentation – in social movements. The study considers the influence of the regional context and the applicability of Western theories in non-Western case studies. It is based on primary data that was collected through semistructured interviews and analyzed in detail by means of a combined top-down and bottom-up procedure based on the grounded theory methodology. Contents Social Movement Theory Grounded Theory Methodology Economic and environmental policy in the Brazilian Amazon Rationale of the Belo Monte conflict Traveling of theories and concepts Target Groups Researchers and students of Social Movement Research, Latin American Studies, and (Comparative) Area Studies Practitioners in the fields of environmental governance, sustainable development, and human rights The Author Ina Peters is head of research management at the Academy for Spatial Research and Planning (ARL). She was a research fellow at the GIGA Institute of Latin American Studies headed by Professor Detlef Nolte and a doctoral student of Professor Kai-Uwe Schnapp at Universität Hamburg. .
650 0 $a Political science. $3 558774
650 0 $a Social structure. $3 555182
650 0 $a Social inequality. $3 1253733
650 0 $a Environmental law. $3 567063
650 0 $a Environmental policy. $3 556516
650 1 4 $a Political Science. $3 668850
650 2 4 $a Social Structure, Social Inequality. $3 883677
650 2 4 $a Environmental Law/Policy/Ecojustice. $3 677313
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783658193256
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783658193270
830 0 $a Bürgergesellschaft und Demokratie, $x 2627-3195 ; $v 44 $3 1262872
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-19326-3
912 $a ZDB-2-POS
912 $a ZDB-2-SXPI
950 $a Political Science and International Studies (SpringerNature-41174)
950 $a Political Science and International Studies (R0) (SpringerNature-43724)