國立虎尾科技大學 |

Feyerabend’s Epistemological Anarchism = How Science Works and its Importance for Science Education /

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Feyerabend’s Epistemological Anarchism/ by Mansoor Niaz.
其他題名:	How Science Works and its Importance for Science Education /
作者:	Niaz, Mansoor.
面頁冊數:	XVIII, 224 p. 1 illus.online resource. :
Contained By:	Springer Nature eBook
標題:	History of Science. -
電子資源:	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36859-3
ISBN:	9783030368593

Feyerabend’s Epistemological Anarchism = How Science Works and its Importance for Science Education /
Niaz, Mansoor.

Feyerabend’s Epistemological AnarchismHow Science Works and its Importance for Science Education /[electronic resource] :by Mansoor Niaz. - 1st ed. 2020. - XVIII, 224 p. 1 illus.online resource. - Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education,501878-0482 ;. - Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education,44.

Chapter 1. Introduction: Exploring Epistemological Anarchism -- Chapter 2. Epistemological Anarchism and How Science Works -- Chapter 3. Understanding of Epistemological Anarchism (Feyerabend) in Research Reported in the Journal Science & Education (Springer) -- Chapter 4. Understanding Epistemological Anarchism (Feyerabend) in Research Reported in the Journal of Research in Science Teaching (Wiley-Blackwell) -- Chapter 5. Understanding Epistemological Anarchism (Feyerabend) in Research Reported in the Journal Interchange (Springer) -- Chapter 6. Understanding Epistemological Anarchism (Feyerabend) in Research Reported in Reference Work -- Chapter 7. Feyerabend’s Counterinduction and Science Textbooks -- Chapter 8. Conclusion: Feyerabend and Challenges of the Twenty-First Century -- References -- Appendices -- Index.

This book argues that the traditional image of Feyerabend is erroneous and that, contrary to common belief, he was a great admirer of science. It shows how Feyerabend presented a vision of science that represented how science really works. Besides giving a theoretical framework based on Feyerabend´s philosophy of science, the book offers criteria that can help readers to evaluate and understand research reported in important international science education journals, with respect to Feyerabend’s epistemological anarchism. The book includes an evaluation of general chemistry and physics textbooks. Most science curricula and textbooks provide the following advice to students: Do not allow theories in contradiction with observations, and all scientific theories must be formulated inductively based on experimental facts. Feyerabend questioned this widely prevalent premise of science education in most parts of the world, and in contrast gave the following advice: Scientists can accept a hypothesis despite experimental evidence to the contrary and scientific theories are not always consistent with all the experimental data. No wonder Feyerabend became a controversial philosopher and was considered to be against rationalism and anti-science. Recent research in philosophy of science, however, has shown that most of Feyerabend´s philosophical ideas are in agreement with recent trends in the 21st century. Of the 120 articles from science education journals, evaluated in this book only 9% recognized that Feyerabend was presenting a plurality of perspectives based on how science really works. Furthermore, it has been shown that Feyerabend could even be considered as a perspectival realist. Among other aspects, Feyerabend emphasized that in order to look for breakthroughs in science one does not have to be complacent about the truth of the theories but rather has to look for opportunities to “break rules” or “violate categories.” Mansoor Niaz carefully analyses references to Feyerabend in the literature and displays the importance of Feyerabend’s philosophy in analyzing, historical episodes. Niaz shows through this remarkable book a deep understanding to the essence of science. - Calvin Kalman, Concordia University, Canada In this book Mansoor Niaz explores the antecedents, context and features of Feyerabend’s work and offers a more-nuanced understanding, then reviews and considers its reception in the science education and philosophy of science literature. This is a valuable contribution to scholarship about Feyerabend, with the potential to inform further research as well as science education practice.- David Geelan, Griffith University, Australia.

ISBN: 9783030368593

Standard No.: 10.1007/978-3-030-36859-3doiSubjects--Topical Terms:

671541
History of Science.

LC Class. No.: LC8-6691

Dewey Class. No.: 507.1

Feyerabend’s Epistemological Anarchism = How Science Works and its Importance for Science Education /
LDR:04995nam a22004215i 4500 001 1019015
003 DE-He213
005 20200705074630.0
007 cr nn 008mamaa
008 210318s2020 gw | s |||| 0|eng d
020 $a 9783030368593 $9 978-3-030-36859-3
024 7 $a 10.1007/978-3-030-36859-3 $2 doi
035 $a 978-3-030-36859-3
050 4 $a LC8-6691
072 7 $a JNU $2 bicssc
072 7 $a SCI063000 $2 bisacsh
072 7 $a JNU $2 thema
072 7 $a PD $2 thema
082 0 4 $a 507.1 $2 23
100 1 $a Niaz, Mansoor. $4 aut $4 http://id.loc.gov/vocabulary/relators/aut $3 786592
245 1 0 $a Feyerabend’s Epistemological Anarchism $h [electronic resource] : $b How Science Works and its Importance for Science Education / $c by Mansoor Niaz.
250 $a 1st ed. 2020.
264 1 $a Cham : $b Springer International Publishing : $b Imprint: Springer, $c 2020.
300 $a XVIII, 224 p. 1 illus. $b online resource.
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
347 $a text file $b PDF $2 rda
490 1 $a Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, $x 1878-0482 ; $v 50
505 0 $a Chapter 1. Introduction: Exploring Epistemological Anarchism -- Chapter 2. Epistemological Anarchism and How Science Works -- Chapter 3. Understanding of Epistemological Anarchism (Feyerabend) in Research Reported in the Journal Science & Education (Springer) -- Chapter 4. Understanding Epistemological Anarchism (Feyerabend) in Research Reported in the Journal of Research in Science Teaching (Wiley-Blackwell) -- Chapter 5. Understanding Epistemological Anarchism (Feyerabend) in Research Reported in the Journal Interchange (Springer) -- Chapter 6. Understanding Epistemological Anarchism (Feyerabend) in Research Reported in Reference Work -- Chapter 7. Feyerabend’s Counterinduction and Science Textbooks -- Chapter 8. Conclusion: Feyerabend and Challenges of the Twenty-First Century -- References -- Appendices -- Index.
520 $a This book argues that the traditional image of Feyerabend is erroneous and that, contrary to common belief, he was a great admirer of science. It shows how Feyerabend presented a vision of science that represented how science really works. Besides giving a theoretical framework based on Feyerabend´s philosophy of science, the book offers criteria that can help readers to evaluate and understand research reported in important international science education journals, with respect to Feyerabend’s epistemological anarchism. The book includes an evaluation of general chemistry and physics textbooks. Most science curricula and textbooks provide the following advice to students: Do not allow theories in contradiction with observations, and all scientific theories must be formulated inductively based on experimental facts. Feyerabend questioned this widely prevalent premise of science education in most parts of the world, and in contrast gave the following advice: Scientists can accept a hypothesis despite experimental evidence to the contrary and scientific theories are not always consistent with all the experimental data. No wonder Feyerabend became a controversial philosopher and was considered to be against rationalism and anti-science. Recent research in philosophy of science, however, has shown that most of Feyerabend´s philosophical ideas are in agreement with recent trends in the 21st century. Of the 120 articles from science education journals, evaluated in this book only 9% recognized that Feyerabend was presenting a plurality of perspectives based on how science really works. Furthermore, it has been shown that Feyerabend could even be considered as a perspectival realist. Among other aspects, Feyerabend emphasized that in order to look for breakthroughs in science one does not have to be complacent about the truth of the theories but rather has to look for opportunities to “break rules” or “violate categories.” Mansoor Niaz carefully analyses references to Feyerabend in the literature and displays the importance of Feyerabend’s philosophy in analyzing, historical episodes. Niaz shows through this remarkable book a deep understanding to the essence of science. - Calvin Kalman, Concordia University, Canada In this book Mansoor Niaz explores the antecedents, context and features of Feyerabend’s work and offers a more-nuanced understanding, then reviews and considers its reception in the science education and philosophy of science literature. This is a valuable contribution to scholarship about Feyerabend, with the potential to inform further research as well as science education practice.- David Geelan, Griffith University, Australia.
650 2 4 $a History of Science. $3 671541
650 2 4 $a Philosophy of Science. $3 668204
650 2 4 $a Teaching and Teacher Education. $3 783596
650 1 4 $a Science Education. $3 668800
650 0 $a History. $3 669538
650 0 $a Philosophy and science. $3 555818
650 0 $a Teaching. $3 555255
650 0 $a Science education. $3 1151737
710 2 $a SpringerLink (Online service) $3 593884
773 0 $t Springer Nature eBook
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030368586
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030368609
776 0 8 $i Printed edition: $z 9783030368616
830 0 $a Contemporary Trends and Issues in Science Education, $x 1878-0482 ; $v 44 $3 1274879
856 4 0 $u https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-36859-3
912 $a ZDB-2-EDA
912 $a ZDB-2-SXED
950 $a Education (SpringerNature-41171)
950 $a Education (R0) (SpringerNature-43721)