語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Does News Coverage of Partisan Polarization and Issue Polarization Specifically Further Divide an Already Divided Public?
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Does News Coverage of Partisan Polarization and Issue Polarization Specifically Further Divide an Already Divided Public?/
作者:
Gustin, Jacob Richard.
面頁冊數:
1 online resource (62 pages)
附註:
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01.
Contained By:
Masters Abstracts International85-01.
標題:
Public policy. -
電子資源:
click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9798379952075
Does News Coverage of Partisan Polarization and Issue Polarization Specifically Further Divide an Already Divided Public?
Gustin, Jacob Richard.
Does News Coverage of Partisan Polarization and Issue Polarization Specifically Further Divide an Already Divided Public?
- 1 online resource (62 pages)
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01.
Thesis (M.A.)--University of Minnesota, 2023.
Includes bibliographical references
Democrats and Republicans in the United States are increasingly polarized; not necessarily only because of where they stand on policy issues, but particularly in light of the way they appear to loathe each other as human beings (Iyengar et al., 2019; Iyengar & Westwood, 2015; Kalmoe & Mason, 2022). Partisan discrimination exceeds even racial discrimination in the United States (Iyengar & Westwood, 2015), with studies finding that party identity is used to screen others on dating apps (Huber & Malhotra, 2016) and job applications (Gift & Gift, 2015).Americans are increasingly told by the news media about the phenomenon of polarization within the country, labeling it as a problem that needs fixing (Levendusky & Malhotra, 2016; Robison & Mullinix, 2016). Likewise, a number of studies in the past decade have sought to identify ways in which to depolarize the electorate (Huddy & Yair, 2021; Levendusky, 2018; Levendusky & Stecula, 2021).
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9798379952075Subjects--Topical Terms:
1002398
Public policy.
Subjects--Index Terms:
Affective polarizationIndex Terms--Genre/Form:
554714
Electronic books.
Does News Coverage of Partisan Polarization and Issue Polarization Specifically Further Divide an Already Divided Public?
LDR
:02330ntm a2200397K 4500
001
1141166
005
20231130111631.5
006
m o d
007
cr mn ---uuuuu
008
250605s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9798379952075
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI30530827
035
$a
AAI30530827
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
$d
NTU
100
1
$a
Gustin, Jacob Richard.
$3
1464806
245
1 0
$a
Does News Coverage of Partisan Polarization and Issue Polarization Specifically Further Divide an Already Divided Public?
264
0
$c
2023
300
$a
1 online resource (62 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 85-01.
500
$a
Advisor: Toff, Benjamin.
502
$a
Thesis (M.A.)--University of Minnesota, 2023.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
Democrats and Republicans in the United States are increasingly polarized; not necessarily only because of where they stand on policy issues, but particularly in light of the way they appear to loathe each other as human beings (Iyengar et al., 2019; Iyengar & Westwood, 2015; Kalmoe & Mason, 2022). Partisan discrimination exceeds even racial discrimination in the United States (Iyengar & Westwood, 2015), with studies finding that party identity is used to screen others on dating apps (Huber & Malhotra, 2016) and job applications (Gift & Gift, 2015).Americans are increasingly told by the news media about the phenomenon of polarization within the country, labeling it as a problem that needs fixing (Levendusky & Malhotra, 2016; Robison & Mullinix, 2016). Likewise, a number of studies in the past decade have sought to identify ways in which to depolarize the electorate (Huddy & Yair, 2021; Levendusky, 2018; Levendusky & Stecula, 2021).
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2024
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
Public policy.
$3
1002398
650
4
$a
Public administration.
$3
562473
650
4
$a
Mass communications.
$3
1335238
653
$a
Affective polarization
653
$a
Ideology
653
$a
News coverage
653
$a
Polarization
653
$a
Social identity
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
local
$3
554714
690
$a
0708
690
$a
0630
690
$a
0617
710
2
$a
University of Minnesota.
$b
Mass Communication.
$3
1180550
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
1178819
773
0
$t
Masters Abstracts International
$g
85-01.
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30530827
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼[密碼必須為2種組合(英文和數字)及長度為10碼以上]
登入