國立虎尾科技大學 |

The Specifics of Specific Learning Disability : = An Analysis of State-Level Eligibility Criteria and Response to Intervention Practices.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	The Specifics of Specific Learning Disability :/
其他題名:	An Analysis of State-Level Eligibility Criteria and Response to Intervention Practices.
作者:	Williams, Lora M.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (82 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-11.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International83-11.
標題:	Educational psychology. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798438738138

The Specifics of Specific Learning Disability : = An Analysis of State-Level Eligibility Criteria and Response to Intervention Practices.
Williams, Lora M.

The Specifics of Specific Learning Disability :An Analysis of State-Level Eligibility Criteria and Response to Intervention Practices. - 1 online resource (82 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-11.

Thesis (Ed.S.)--University of South Florida, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

The field of specific learning disability (SLD) in the United States has changed considerably since reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA; (§3007); State Education Agencies (SEAs) have been transitioning away from the severe discrepancy model of SLD identification and towards a Response to Intervention (RTI) model (Hauerwas et al, 2013). This study aimed to review SLD practices in the United States through the analysis of SEA documents and to evaluate the progress made since the reauthorization of IDEA. The aim of the current study was to provide a snapshot of 1) how SEA regulations defined SLD; 2) when SEA documents were last updated; 3) what SLD identification procedures were outlined in SEA regulations; and 4) which SEAs included RTI best practice elements (universal screening, progress monitoring, fidelity practices) in both regulation and guidance documents. The research methodology utilized in this study included a descriptive analysis to examine and understand individual SEAs' regulations and guidelines regarding SLD identification and RTI. Results indicated that SLD and RTI regulations and guidelines have changed considerably since the last reviews (Hauerwas et al., 2013; Maki et al., 2015). The definitions of SLD provided in regulation documents varied between SEAs, but the majority adopted the federal definition with no changes. The most recent research of Hauerwas et al. (2013) served as a baseline for analyzing when SEA documents were last updated; three-quarters of collected regulation and guidance documents have either been updated or added since the Hauerwas et al. collection date of 2011. Analysis of SLD regulation documents indicated that approximately one quarter of SEAs required the sole use of RTI for SLD identification. Lastly, both regulation and guidance documents were analyzed for RTI best practices; language regarding progress monitoring was present in the vast majority of SEAs documents. Implications for policy, practice, and future research are discussed.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798438738138Subjects--Topical Terms:

555103
Educational psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Specific learning disabilityIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

The Specifics of Specific Learning Disability : = An Analysis of State-Level Eligibility Criteria and Response to Intervention Practices.
LDR:03401ntm a2200361K 4500 001 1141216
005 20240311061543.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798438738138
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29060968
035 $a AAI29060968
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Williams, Lora M. $3 1464879
245 1 4 $a The Specifics of Specific Learning Disability : $b An Analysis of State-Level Eligibility Criteria and Response to Intervention Practices.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (82 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 83-11.
500 $a Advisor: January, Stacy-Ann A.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.S.)--University of South Florida, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The field of specific learning disability (SLD) in the United States has changed considerably since reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA; (§3007); State Education Agencies (SEAs) have been transitioning away from the severe discrepancy model of SLD identification and towards a Response to Intervention (RTI) model (Hauerwas et al, 2013). This study aimed to review SLD practices in the United States through the analysis of SEA documents and to evaluate the progress made since the reauthorization of IDEA. The aim of the current study was to provide a snapshot of 1) how SEA regulations defined SLD; 2) when SEA documents were last updated; 3) what SLD identification procedures were outlined in SEA regulations; and 4) which SEAs included RTI best practice elements (universal screening, progress monitoring, fidelity practices) in both regulation and guidance documents. The research methodology utilized in this study included a descriptive analysis to examine and understand individual SEAs' regulations and guidelines regarding SLD identification and RTI. Results indicated that SLD and RTI regulations and guidelines have changed considerably since the last reviews (Hauerwas et al., 2013; Maki et al., 2015). The definitions of SLD provided in regulation documents varied between SEAs, but the majority adopted the federal definition with no changes. The most recent research of Hauerwas et al. (2013) served as a baseline for analyzing when SEA documents were last updated; three-quarters of collected regulation and guidance documents have either been updated or added since the Hauerwas et al. collection date of 2011. Analysis of SLD regulation documents indicated that approximately one quarter of SEAs required the sole use of RTI for SLD identification. Lastly, both regulation and guidance documents were analyzed for RTI best practices; language regarding progress monitoring was present in the vast majority of SEAs documents. Implications for policy, practice, and future research are discussed.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 555103
650 4 $a Special education. $3 567627
653 $a Specific learning disability
653 $a Response to intervention
653 $a Intervention regulation
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0529
690 $a 0525
710 2 $a University of South Florida. $b Special Education. $3 1464880
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 83-11.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29060968 $z click for full text (PQDT)