國立虎尾科技大學 |

Implications of Online, Hybrid and In-Person Design Studio Teaching After the Pandemic a Grounded Theory Approach.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Implications of Online, Hybrid and In-Person Design Studio Teaching After the Pandemic a Grounded Theory Approach./
作者:	Yuan, Jinlong.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (141 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-02A.
標題:	Instructional design. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798841776697

Implications of Online, Hybrid and In-Person Design Studio Teaching After the Pandemic a Grounded Theory Approach.
Yuan, Jinlong.

Implications of Online, Hybrid and In-Person Design Studio Teaching After the Pandemic a Grounded Theory Approach. - 1 online resource (141 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

Distance and Blended education have been studied and applied in many disciplines but there has been limited use and assessment of these learning modes for design studios. The Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic has forced education delivery methods in the United States to become more online/hybrid in the 2020 school year without much preparation. As schools slowly shift to post-pandemic teaching modes, it is necessary to examine and evaluate what was learned during the pandemic online environment for design education. Previous studies have examined the effectiveness of online delivery of design education by virtual design studios using advanced digital technologies and equipment on a variety of platforms to teach specific design skills. In this study, the researcher uses semi-structured interviews of design educators and a survey of design students to examine their experience with their online learning environment during the 2020 school year. The qualitative and quantitative results of the study shed light on the challenges of online design studio learning during the pandemic and revealed opportunities for improving future design studio education. Lack of social interactions during the pandemic online learning impacted students' motivation. The use of digital technologies improved communication efficiency, but there is also ineffective communication that negatively affected peer interaction and learning, which in turn affected student learning outcomes and learning satisfaction compared to in-person design studios. The results also revealed openings to promote fully online design education, with studio courses reconfigured using the Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework and with properly trained design instructors. This hybrid learning environment would lead to students receiving an optimal learning experience that benefits from the advantages of in-person instructions along with the efficiency of digital technology-based learning platforms.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798841776697Subjects--Topical Terms:

1148462
Instructional design.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Online design educationIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Implications of Online, Hybrid and In-Person Design Studio Teaching After the Pandemic a Grounded Theory Approach.
LDR:03510ntm a22004217 4500 001 1141681
005 20240414211443.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798841776697
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29260758
035 $a AAI29260758
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Yuan, Jinlong. $3 1465605
245 1 0 $a Implications of Online, Hybrid and In-Person Design Studio Teaching After the Pandemic a Grounded Theory Approach.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (141 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-02, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Brooks, Kenneth R.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Arizona State University, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Distance and Blended education have been studied and applied in many disciplines but there has been limited use and assessment of these learning modes for design studios. The Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) pandemic has forced education delivery methods in the United States to become more online/hybrid in the 2020 school year without much preparation. As schools slowly shift to post-pandemic teaching modes, it is necessary to examine and evaluate what was learned during the pandemic online environment for design education. Previous studies have examined the effectiveness of online delivery of design education by virtual design studios using advanced digital technologies and equipment on a variety of platforms to teach specific design skills. In this study, the researcher uses semi-structured interviews of design educators and a survey of design students to examine their experience with their online learning environment during the 2020 school year. The qualitative and quantitative results of the study shed light on the challenges of online design studio learning during the pandemic and revealed opportunities for improving future design studio education. Lack of social interactions during the pandemic online learning impacted students' motivation. The use of digital technologies improved communication efficiency, but there is also ineffective communication that negatively affected peer interaction and learning, which in turn affected student learning outcomes and learning satisfaction compared to in-person design studios. The results also revealed openings to promote fully online design education, with studio courses reconfigured using the Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge (TPACK) framework and with properly trained design instructors. This hybrid learning environment would lead to students receiving an optimal learning experience that benefits from the advantages of in-person instructions along with the efficiency of digital technology-based learning platforms.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Instructional design. $3 1148462
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 556755
650 4 $a Pedagogy. $3 1148703
650 4 $a Education. $3 555912
650 4 $a Design. $3 595500
653 $a Online design education
653 $a Hybrid teaching
653 $a Virtual design studios
653 $a COVID-19 pandemic
653 $a Technological Pedagogical and Content Knowledge
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0389
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0456
690 $a 0710
690 $a 0447
710 2 $a Arizona State University. $b Design. $3 1179403
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-02A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29260758 $z click for full text (PQDT)