國立虎尾科技大學 |

Exploring Expertise-Related Effects on Design Evaluation : = A Comparison of Expert, Quasi-Expert, and Novice Evaluations of Design Products.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Exploring Expertise-Related Effects on Design Evaluation :/
其他題名:	A Comparison of Expert, Quasi-Expert, and Novice Evaluations of Design Products.
作者:	Hu, Linna.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (236 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-12, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-12B.
標題:	Cognitive psychology. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798379711627

Exploring Expertise-Related Effects on Design Evaluation : = A Comparison of Expert, Quasi-Expert, and Novice Evaluations of Design Products.
Hu, Linna.

Exploring Expertise-Related Effects on Design Evaluation :A Comparison of Expert, Quasi-Expert, and Novice Evaluations of Design Products. - 1 online resource (236 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-12, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Cornell University, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

Design evaluation is characterized by its subjective nature. People with minimal or no design expertise may have different expectations and perceptions of design. A primary goal of this dissertation is to investigate expertise-related effects on the evaluation of design products using different methods. Two literature reviews and three empirical research articles are presented as independent chapters in this "papers option" dissertation.Chapter 2 presents a literature review on the nature of expertise and expert performance and summarizes how design researchers have investigated the role of expertise in design process. Previous design studies often adopted the experience/knowledge-based view of expertise.Chapter 3 presents a review of literature on neurocognitive measures applied to design research studies, including design evaluation studies. The application of neuroscience methods to testing and evaluating design solutions shows great potential for design practices in various fields.Chapter 4 reports two studies investigating the effect of design expertise on the evaluation of lamp designs using the consensual assessment technique, a well-validated tool for evaluating creative products. Results showed that the effect of expertise level on evaluation outcomes varies depending upon the design being evaluated. Experts, quasi-experts, and novices appear to rate and rank some designs similarly high or low, but not all.Chapter 5 describes an eye-tracking study investigating whether there are differences in the gaze behavior of experts, quasi-experts, and novices when evaluating the same set of designs as for the Chapter 4 studies. The results provided partial support for the hypothesized classical expert gaze behavior (i.e., fewer fixations of longer durations) identified by previous researchers in non-design fields. This study provides empirical evidence for the impact of design expertise on visual exploration and design judgment. Chapter 6 presents a mixed methods study exploring gaze behavior, criteria-based evaluations indicating perceived design quality, and the thought process underlying design evaluation. Results showed that as the total time fixating on a design increases, the functionality rating of this design decreases. Different aspects of design quality have unequal impacts on the overall evaluation of design. Plausible explanations for the perceived design quality are identified through interview.Overall, the research findings provide implications for design evaluation and contribute insights into design expertise and education.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798379711627Subjects--Topical Terms:

556029
Cognitive psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Design evaluationIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Exploring Expertise-Related Effects on Design Evaluation : = A Comparison of Expert, Quasi-Expert, and Novice Evaluations of Design Products.
LDR:04040ntm a22004097 4500 001 1141712
005 20240414211453.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798379711627
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30418247
035 $a AAI30418247
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Hu, Linna. $3 1465658
245 1 0 $a Exploring Expertise-Related Effects on Design Evaluation : $b A Comparison of Expert, Quasi-Expert, and Novice Evaluations of Design Products.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (236 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-12, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Shepley, Mardelle M.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Cornell University, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Design evaluation is characterized by its subjective nature. People with minimal or no design expertise may have different expectations and perceptions of design. A primary goal of this dissertation is to investigate expertise-related effects on the evaluation of design products using different methods. Two literature reviews and three empirical research articles are presented as independent chapters in this "papers option" dissertation.Chapter 2 presents a literature review on the nature of expertise and expert performance and summarizes how design researchers have investigated the role of expertise in design process. Previous design studies often adopted the experience/knowledge-based view of expertise.Chapter 3 presents a review of literature on neurocognitive measures applied to design research studies, including design evaluation studies. The application of neuroscience methods to testing and evaluating design solutions shows great potential for design practices in various fields.Chapter 4 reports two studies investigating the effect of design expertise on the evaluation of lamp designs using the consensual assessment technique, a well-validated tool for evaluating creative products. Results showed that the effect of expertise level on evaluation outcomes varies depending upon the design being evaluated. Experts, quasi-experts, and novices appear to rate and rank some designs similarly high or low, but not all.Chapter 5 describes an eye-tracking study investigating whether there are differences in the gaze behavior of experts, quasi-experts, and novices when evaluating the same set of designs as for the Chapter 4 studies. The results provided partial support for the hypothesized classical expert gaze behavior (i.e., fewer fixations of longer durations) identified by previous researchers in non-design fields. This study provides empirical evidence for the impact of design expertise on visual exploration and design judgment. Chapter 6 presents a mixed methods study exploring gaze behavior, criteria-based evaluations indicating perceived design quality, and the thought process underlying design evaluation. Results showed that as the total time fixating on a design increases, the functionality rating of this design decreases. Different aspects of design quality have unequal impacts on the overall evaluation of design. Plausible explanations for the perceived design quality are identified through interview.Overall, the research findings provide implications for design evaluation and contribute insights into design expertise and education.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Cognitive psychology. $3 556029
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 1179418
650 4 $a Neurosciences. $3 593561
650 4 $a Design. $3 595500
653 $a Design evaluation
653 $a Design expertise
653 $a Design research
653 $a Gaze behavior
653 $a Product design
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0389
690 $a 0317
690 $a 0633
690 $a 0384
710 2 $a Cornell University. $b Design and Environmental Analysis. $3 1465659
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-12B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30418247 $z click for full text (PQDT)