國立虎尾科技大學 |

Iliadic and Odyssean Receptions in Tragedy and the Argonautica.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Iliadic and Odyssean Receptions in Tragedy and the Argonautica./
作者:	Bensch-Schaus, Amelia.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (399 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International84-12A.
標題:	Classical literature. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798379750909

Iliadic and Odyssean Receptions in Tragedy and the Argonautica.
Bensch-Schaus, Amelia.

Iliadic and Odyssean Receptions in Tragedy and the Argonautica. - 1 online resource (399 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-12, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

During the classical period in Greece, the immense poetic and cultural authority of Homer came to rest on two central poems, the Iliad and the Odyssey, which differ substantially from each other. While these epics are consistent in terms of language and meter, they contrast sharply in their themes and protagonists. The Iliad is a story of war, while the Odyssey tells the complicated journey of homecoming; Achilles is defined by his βίη, "physical strength," while Odysseus is remarkable for his µῆτις, "intellectual cunning." These are only the clearest differences between the two epics, and, as this dissertation shows, many more emerge in the works of Classical and Hellenistic poets, who build on the way that these epics present the same characters and issues from different perspectives. The tragedians and Apollonius composed works that invited comparison with Homer through an overlap of characters or the shared genre of heroic epic, and I argue that these later poets create and respond to a Homeric corpus defined by the differences between the Iliad and the Odyssey. As a result, this dissertation outlines the early iterations of what came to be an enduring strategy in crafting Homeric allusions.For Aeschylus, the Iliad and the Odyssey were still being established as the most prominent works of Homer, and Chapter 1 suggests that his two fragmentary tetralogies based on each Homeric epic play a role in singling these epics out and elevating them for special engagement within tragedy. Chapter 2, on Sophocles' Ajax and Philoctetes, and Chapter 3, on Euripides' Trojan Women and Helen, both consider how these plays allude to the Iliad and the Odyssey in contrasting ways as they depict events in the gap between the two Homeric epics. Chapter 4 shifts in time and genre to the Argonautica, which intertwines the plot of its Odyssean voyage with allusions to important Iliadic scenes. Tragedy and Apollonius' epic thus converge in exploiting the differences between the Iliad and the Odyssey to open up new directions for Homeric reception.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798379750909Subjects--Topical Terms:

654014
Classical literature.
Subjects--Index Terms:

AeschylusIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Iliadic and Odyssean Receptions in Tragedy and the Argonautica.
LDR:03429ntm a22003977 4500 001 1145250
005 20240618081800.5
006 m o d
007 cr mn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798379750909
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30425003
035 $a AAI30425003
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Bensch-Schaus, Amelia. $3 1470505
245 1 0 $a Iliadic and Odyssean Receptions in Tragedy and the Argonautica.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (399 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 84-12, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Murnaghan, Sheila.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Pennsylvania, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a During the classical period in Greece, the immense poetic and cultural authority of Homer came to rest on two central poems, the Iliad and the Odyssey, which differ substantially from each other. While these epics are consistent in terms of language and meter, they contrast sharply in their themes and protagonists. The Iliad is a story of war, while the Odyssey tells the complicated journey of homecoming; Achilles is defined by his βίη, "physical strength," while Odysseus is remarkable for his µῆτις, "intellectual cunning." These are only the clearest differences between the two epics, and, as this dissertation shows, many more emerge in the works of Classical and Hellenistic poets, who build on the way that these epics present the same characters and issues from different perspectives. The tragedians and Apollonius composed works that invited comparison with Homer through an overlap of characters or the shared genre of heroic epic, and I argue that these later poets create and respond to a Homeric corpus defined by the differences between the Iliad and the Odyssey. As a result, this dissertation outlines the early iterations of what came to be an enduring strategy in crafting Homeric allusions.For Aeschylus, the Iliad and the Odyssey were still being established as the most prominent works of Homer, and Chapter 1 suggests that his two fragmentary tetralogies based on each Homeric epic play a role in singling these epics out and elevating them for special engagement within tragedy. Chapter 2, on Sophocles' Ajax and Philoctetes, and Chapter 3, on Euripides' Trojan Women and Helen, both consider how these plays allude to the Iliad and the Odyssey in contrasting ways as they depict events in the gap between the two Homeric epics. Chapter 4 shifts in time and genre to the Argonautica, which intertwines the plot of its Odyssean voyage with allusions to important Iliadic scenes. Tragedy and Apollonius' epic thus converge in exploiting the differences between the Iliad and the Odyssey to open up new directions for Homeric reception.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Classical literature. $3 654014
650 4 $a Classical studies. $3 1182689
653 $a Aeschylus
653 $a Ancient reception
653 $a Apollonius
653 $a Euripides
653 $a Homeric reception
653 $a Sophocles
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0434
690 $a 0294
710 2 $a University of Pennsylvania. $b Classical Studies. $3 1470506
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 84-12A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30425003 $z click for full text (PQDT)