國立虎尾科技大學 |

Indigenous Program Evaluation Approaches, Frameworks and Models : = A Systematic Review.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Indigenous Program Evaluation Approaches, Frameworks and Models :/
Reminder of title:	A Systematic Review.
Author:	Charlo, Landon James.
Description:	1 online resource (168 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-12A.
Subject:	Educational psychology. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798383098073

Indigenous Program Evaluation Approaches, Frameworks and Models : = A Systematic Review.
Charlo, Landon James.

Indigenous Program Evaluation Approaches, Frameworks and Models :A Systematic Review. - 1 online resource (168 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Washington State University, 2024.

Includes bibliographical references

Indigenous program evaluation frameworks have been gaining recognition over the past two decades as a recommended alternative to traditional Western mainstream evaluation approaches by evaluators for Indigenous communities from the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Indigenous evaluation frameworks have been generally described as participatory, culturally responsive, and reflecting community contexts. However, there remains a gap in knowledge about Indigenous evaluation conceptualizations, appropriate application of inquiry methods, and current and historical tensions that may limit the use and capacity of this emerging framework. Previous reviews on Indigenous program evaluation have limited their scope to health and wellness programs, extent of literature, and have not explored issues of power and policy regulations often imposed by outside funding agencies. In this systematic review of 39 articles, I provide a comprehensive summary of major and minor themes found to conceptualize Indigenous program evaluation approaches, frameworks, and models. Additionally, I identified Indigenous and Western mainstream methods that are used and recommended by Indigenous evaluation practitioners. Lastly, I explore issues of power and tensions that have shaped theory and practice, and how those critical issues are framing the future of Indigenous evaluation. The analysis of literature selected for this systematic review will help non-Indigenous evaluators, policy makers, and funding agencies become familiar with Indigenous community protocols and contextual factors important for relationship building and utilization. This dissertation concludes with recommendations for advancing an Indigenous evaluation framework that is responsive to community needs and satisfies funding agencies requirements.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798383098073Subjects--Topical Terms:

555103
Educational psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Critical Indigenous Research MethodologiesIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Indigenous Program Evaluation Approaches, Frameworks and Models : = A Systematic Review.
LDR:03248ntm a22003977 4500 001 1146275
005 20240812064358.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2024 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798383098073
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30997550
035 $a AAI30997550
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Charlo, Landon James. $3 1471635
245 1 0 $a Indigenous Program Evaluation Approaches, Frameworks and Models : $b A Systematic Review.
264 0 $c 2024
300 $a 1 online resource (168 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-12, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Higheagle Strong, Zoe.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Washington State University, 2024.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Indigenous program evaluation frameworks have been gaining recognition over the past two decades as a recommended alternative to traditional Western mainstream evaluation approaches by evaluators for Indigenous communities from the United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand. Indigenous evaluation frameworks have been generally described as participatory, culturally responsive, and reflecting community contexts. However, there remains a gap in knowledge about Indigenous evaluation conceptualizations, appropriate application of inquiry methods, and current and historical tensions that may limit the use and capacity of this emerging framework. Previous reviews on Indigenous program evaluation have limited their scope to health and wellness programs, extent of literature, and have not explored issues of power and policy regulations often imposed by outside funding agencies. In this systematic review of 39 articles, I provide a comprehensive summary of major and minor themes found to conceptualize Indigenous program evaluation approaches, frameworks, and models. Additionally, I identified Indigenous and Western mainstream methods that are used and recommended by Indigenous evaluation practitioners. Lastly, I explore issues of power and tensions that have shaped theory and practice, and how those critical issues are framing the future of Indigenous evaluation. The analysis of literature selected for this systematic review will help non-Indigenous evaluators, policy makers, and funding agencies become familiar with Indigenous community protocols and contextual factors important for relationship building and utilization. This dissertation concludes with recommendations for advancing an Indigenous evaluation framework that is responsive to community needs and satisfies funding agencies requirements.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 555103
650 4 $a Educational evaluation. $3 555501
650 4 $a Education. $3 555912
653 $a Critical Indigenous Research Methodologies
653 $a Evaluation
653 $a Indigenous communities
653 $a Relationship
653 $a Funding agencies
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0443
690 $a 0515
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Washington State University. $b Department of Kinesiology and Educational Psychology. $3 1471636
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-12A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30997550 $z click for full text (PQDT)