國立虎尾科技大學 |

On the Definition of Binding Domains in Spanish : = The Roles of the Binding Theory Module and the Lexicon (Language Acquisition, Syntax, Psycholinguistics, Development, Subjunctive).

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	On the Definition of Binding Domains in Spanish :/
其他題名:	The Roles of the Binding Theory Module and the Lexicon (Language Acquisition, Syntax, Psycholinguistics, Development, Subjunctive).
作者:	Padilla Rivera, Jose Antonio.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (282 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 46-07, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International46-07A.
標題:	Linguistics. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798204591349

On the Definition of Binding Domains in Spanish : = The Roles of the Binding Theory Module and the Lexicon (Language Acquisition, Syntax, Psycholinguistics, Development, Subjunctive).
Padilla Rivera, Jose Antonio.

On the Definition of Binding Domains in Spanish :The Roles of the Binding Theory Module and the Lexicon (Language Acquisition, Syntax, Psycholinguistics, Development, Subjunctive). - 1 online resource (282 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 46-07, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Cornell University, 1985.

Includes bibliographical references

Two instances of anaphora in Spanish not consistent with Chomsky's (1981a) formulation of the Binding Principles are examined: (1) the non-complementarity of anaphors and pronominals within Prepositional Phrases, and (2) the obligatory subject-subject disjoint reference requirement (DRR) in some structures with subjunctive complements. These two cases are explored both in terms of a linguistic analysis and child language acquisition data. The linguistic analysis argues that a strictly structural solution may be found for Case (1), but that proposed strictly structural accounts, which assume subjunctive complements to be tenseless and which incorporate the element TENSE into the definition of binding domains for pronominals, are untenable for Case (2). It is argued that lexical/semantic properties of ('+)volitional verbs interact with the structural principles in determining the DRR. The results of the experiments on acquisition with eighty 3-9 year-old children--using an act-out task--showed that in early child language children define binding domains in terms of constituent structure for both (1) and (2). In simple sentences, S and PP are initially defined as minimal binding domains for both anaphors and pronominals. Proforms are initially differentiated in direct object position of S. Within PPs, where there is no c-commanding antecedent, proforms are initially assimilated and treated as pronouns (free to corefer). This initial hypothesis is modified developmentally for anaphors within PPs. The results for complex sentences show that, regardless of complement type (indicative, subjunctive), children initially define the complement S as the binding domain for its subject, and allow the subject to (co)refer freely. In agreement with the linguistic analysis, the DRR develops through the interaction of lexical/semantic properties of main verbs with the structural principles, and not as a function of TENSE.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798204591349Subjects--Topical Terms:

557829
Linguistics.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

On the Definition of Binding Domains in Spanish : = The Roles of the Binding Theory Module and the Lexicon (Language Acquisition, Syntax, Psycholinguistics, Development, Subjunctive).
LDR:03216ntm a22003137 4500 001 1147150
005 20240909062230.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s1985 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798204591349
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI8516919
035 $a AAI8516919
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Padilla Rivera, Jose Antonio. $3 1472809
245 1 0 $a On the Definition of Binding Domains in Spanish : $b The Roles of the Binding Theory Module and the Lexicon (Language Acquisition, Syntax, Psycholinguistics, Development, Subjunctive).
264 0 $c 1985
300 $a 1 online resource (282 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 46-07, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Cornell University, 1985.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Two instances of anaphora in Spanish not consistent with Chomsky's (1981a) formulation of the Binding Principles are examined: (1) the non-complementarity of anaphors and pronominals within Prepositional Phrases, and (2) the obligatory subject-subject disjoint reference requirement (DRR) in some structures with subjunctive complements. These two cases are explored both in terms of a linguistic analysis and child language acquisition data. The linguistic analysis argues that a strictly structural solution may be found for Case (1), but that proposed strictly structural accounts, which assume subjunctive complements to be tenseless and which incorporate the element TENSE into the definition of binding domains for pronominals, are untenable for Case (2). It is argued that lexical/semantic properties of ('+)volitional verbs interact with the structural principles in determining the DRR. The results of the experiments on acquisition with eighty 3-9 year-old children--using an act-out task--showed that in early child language children define binding domains in terms of constituent structure for both (1) and (2). In simple sentences, S and PP are initially defined as minimal binding domains for both anaphors and pronominals. Proforms are initially differentiated in direct object position of S. Within PPs, where there is no c-commanding antecedent, proforms are initially assimilated and treated as pronouns (free to corefer). This initial hypothesis is modified developmentally for anaphors within PPs. The results for complex sentences show that, regardless of complement type (indicative, subjunctive), children initially define the complement S as the binding domain for its subject, and allow the subject to (co)refer freely. In agreement with the linguistic analysis, the DRR develops through the interaction of lexical/semantic properties of main verbs with the structural principles, and not as a function of TENSE.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 557829
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0290
710 2 $a Cornell University. $3 845492
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 46-07A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=8516919 $z click for full text (PQDT)