國立虎尾科技大學 |

Incorporation and Case Theory in Spanish : = A crosslinguistic perspective.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Incorporation and Case Theory in Spanish :/
其他題名:	A crosslinguistic perspective.
作者:	Masullo, Pascual Jose.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (373 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 54-11, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International54-11A.
標題:	Linguistics. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798208520901

Incorporation and Case Theory in Spanish : = A crosslinguistic perspective.
Masullo, Pascual Jose.

Incorporation and Case Theory in Spanish :A crosslinguistic perspective. - 1 online resource (373 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 54-11, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 1992.

Includes bibliographical references

The present work purports to be a contribution to a better understanding of the nature of Case Theory in the Principles and Parameters approach (GB), while presenting independent evidence in favor of some current proposals relating to Case Theory, more specifically, Baker's (1988) Incorporation Theory, as well as Koopman and Sportiche's (1988) and Contreras' (1992) claims regarding nominative case assignment. In chapter 1 I provide a unified account of dative constructions, arguing that dative is a structural rather than inherent case in Spanish, and that it arises as a result of the incorporation of several lexical categories into the verb, viz. prepositions, substantives (Plann, 1986), adjectives, verbs in causative constructions, and nouns in light verb and possessor raising constructions. In chapter 2 I provide independent evidence for Belletti and Rizzi's (1988) analysis of quirky datives in psych verb constructions, extending it to other predicate types, as well as to other non-nominative constituents. I propose that quirky subjects in the world's languages can be classified into two types: those that occupy Spec (IP) as an A position (the Icelandic case), and those that occupy Spec (IP) as an A-bar position (the Spanish case). A parameter is proposed for the second type which predicts that a language will allow "quirky" subjects only if nominative case is assigned via government by lexical AGR in that language. In chapter 3 I deal with the multifarious uses of the clitic se in Spanish. Drawing on Baker's (1988) analysis for its impersonal use, I argue that se can be viewed as a nominal head lacking both phi and specific semantic features that incorporates either into INFL or the verb, the argumental role it plays depending on the particular construction in which it occurs. It will be shown that se can stand not only for the external argument, but also for subcategorized internal arguments of various kinds. Finally, in chapter 4 I argue that bare NPs are defective constituents which have not projected to their maximal functional value (the determiner phrase), and that therefore they cannot be identified by means of structural case alone, requiring instead stricter licensing means, such as inherent case or incorporation. A parallel is drawn between the argumental and predicative uses of bare nominals by claiming that they lack a referential index in the sense of Rizzi (1990), especially when selected by "light" verbs and prepositions.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798208520901Subjects--Topical Terms:

557829
Linguistics.
Subjects--Index Terms:

case theoryIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Incorporation and Case Theory in Spanish : = A crosslinguistic perspective.
LDR:03768ntm a22003497 4500 001 1147155
005 20240909062231.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s1992 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798208520901
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI9312714
035 $a AAI9312714
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Masullo, Pascual Jose. $3 1472814
245 1 0 $a Incorporation and Case Theory in Spanish : $b A crosslinguistic perspective.
264 0 $c 1992
300 $a 1 online resource (373 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 54-11, Section: A.
500 $a Publisher info.: Dissertation/Thesis.
500 $a Advisor: Contreras, Heles.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 1992.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The present work purports to be a contribution to a better understanding of the nature of Case Theory in the Principles and Parameters approach (GB), while presenting independent evidence in favor of some current proposals relating to Case Theory, more specifically, Baker's (1988) Incorporation Theory, as well as Koopman and Sportiche's (1988) and Contreras' (1992) claims regarding nominative case assignment. In chapter 1 I provide a unified account of dative constructions, arguing that dative is a structural rather than inherent case in Spanish, and that it arises as a result of the incorporation of several lexical categories into the verb, viz. prepositions, substantives (Plann, 1986), adjectives, verbs in causative constructions, and nouns in light verb and possessor raising constructions. In chapter 2 I provide independent evidence for Belletti and Rizzi's (1988) analysis of quirky datives in psych verb constructions, extending it to other predicate types, as well as to other non-nominative constituents. I propose that quirky subjects in the world's languages can be classified into two types: those that occupy Spec (IP) as an A position (the Icelandic case), and those that occupy Spec (IP) as an A-bar position (the Spanish case). A parameter is proposed for the second type which predicts that a language will allow "quirky" subjects only if nominative case is assigned via government by lexical AGR in that language. In chapter 3 I deal with the multifarious uses of the clitic se in Spanish. Drawing on Baker's (1988) analysis for its impersonal use, I argue that se can be viewed as a nominal head lacking both phi and specific semantic features that incorporates either into INFL or the verb, the argumental role it plays depending on the particular construction in which it occurs. It will be shown that se can stand not only for the external argument, but also for subcategorized internal arguments of various kinds. Finally, in chapter 4 I argue that bare NPs are defective constituents which have not projected to their maximal functional value (the determiner phrase), and that therefore they cannot be identified by means of structural case alone, requiring instead stricter licensing means, such as inherent case or incorporation. A parallel is drawn between the argumental and predicative uses of bare nominals by claiming that they lack a referential index in the sense of Rizzi (1990), especially when selected by "light" verbs and prepositions.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 557829
653 $a case theory
653 $a dative constructions
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0290
710 2 $a University of Washington. $3 845434
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 54-11A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=9312714 $z click for full text (PQDT)