國立虎尾科技大學 |

Collaborative Learning with a Geometry Video Game : = The Role of Elaboration and Game Design in Motivation and Learning.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Collaborative Learning with a Geometry Video Game :/
其他題名:	The Role of Elaboration and Game Design in Motivation and Learning.
作者:	Saltzman, Ethlyn.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (156 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-12, Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International83-12A.
標題:	Educational psychology. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798802720653

Collaborative Learning with a Geometry Video Game : = The Role of Elaboration and Game Design in Motivation and Learning.
Saltzman, Ethlyn.

Collaborative Learning with a Geometry Video Game :The Role of Elaboration and Game Design in Motivation and Learning. - 1 online resource (156 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-12, Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--City University of New York, 2022.

Includes bibliographical references

The study examined the effects of a new game mechanic on collaborative learning and mathematical discourse when playing a digital geometry puzzle game. For this study, two new versions of the game "Noobs vs. Leets" were developed. Both versions of the game teach the concepts of complementary and supplementary angles and the angle sum theorem of triangles. It was hypothesized that the version of the game that included a game mechanic that allow players to manipulate the angles, thus creating a more open-ended task, would be more intrinsically motivating, promote elaboration of the geometric concepts, and lead to greater learning gains. However, no differences were found between the two versions of the game in individual learning outcomes, the degree of mathematical elaboration by the pairs, or individual interest, effort or competence. Elaboration of the mathematical concepts in the pairs' discourse in the procedural game levels did predict individual procedural learning outcomes. Elaboration of reasoning did not, however, predict conceptual learning. To understand why no differences were found between the two versions of the game and why there was not a stronger link between elaborative reasoning and conceptual learning, eight representative pairs were chosen for more in-depth analysis. This analysis revealed that the pairs varied tremendously not only in their level of cognitive engagement but also in the quality of their social interactions. I conclude that successful collaborative learning with serious games requires not only careful consideration of how to align the game mechanics with the learning goals but also how to promote positive social rapport between players, as without this rapport, students will be unlikely to learn from one another or from the game. Future research on collaborative learning with digital games should examine not only the role of cognitive engagement in learning but also the role of social rapport.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798802720653Subjects--Topical Terms:

555103
Educational psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Collaborative learningIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Collaborative Learning with a Geometry Video Game : = The Role of Elaboration and Game Design in Motivation and Learning.
LDR:03316ntm a22003737 4500 001 1149186
005 20241007100308.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2022 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798802720653
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI29167861
035 $a AAI29167861
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Saltzman, Ethlyn. $3 1475342
245 1 0 $a Collaborative Learning with a Geometry Video Game : $b The Role of Elaboration and Game Design in Motivation and Learning.
264 0 $c 2022
300 $a 1 online resource (156 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 83-12, Section: A.
500 $a Advisor: Homer, Bruce.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--City University of New York, 2022.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The study examined the effects of a new game mechanic on collaborative learning and mathematical discourse when playing a digital geometry puzzle game. For this study, two new versions of the game "Noobs vs. Leets" were developed. Both versions of the game teach the concepts of complementary and supplementary angles and the angle sum theorem of triangles. It was hypothesized that the version of the game that included a game mechanic that allow players to manipulate the angles, thus creating a more open-ended task, would be more intrinsically motivating, promote elaboration of the geometric concepts, and lead to greater learning gains. However, no differences were found between the two versions of the game in individual learning outcomes, the degree of mathematical elaboration by the pairs, or individual interest, effort or competence. Elaboration of the mathematical concepts in the pairs' discourse in the procedural game levels did predict individual procedural learning outcomes. Elaboration of reasoning did not, however, predict conceptual learning. To understand why no differences were found between the two versions of the game and why there was not a stronger link between elaborative reasoning and conceptual learning, eight representative pairs were chosen for more in-depth analysis. This analysis revealed that the pairs varied tremendously not only in their level of cognitive engagement but also in the quality of their social interactions. I conclude that successful collaborative learning with serious games requires not only careful consideration of how to align the game mechanics with the learning goals but also how to promote positive social rapport between players, as without this rapport, students will be unlikely to learn from one another or from the game. Future research on collaborative learning with digital games should examine not only the role of cognitive engagement in learning but also the role of social rapport.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 555103
650 4 $a Mathematics education. $3 1148686
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 556755
653 $a Collaborative learning
653 $a Cooperative learning
653 $a Games
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0280
690 $a 0710
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a City University of New York. $b Educational Psychology. $3 1466431
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 83-12A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=29167861 $z click for full text (PQDT)