國立虎尾科技大學 |

Untangling Learning Agility : = Exploring Connections With Informal Learning, Personality, Reflective Thinking, and Motivation to Learn.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Untangling Learning Agility :/
其他題名:	Exploring Connections With Informal Learning, Personality, Reflective Thinking, and Motivation to Learn.
作者:	Smith, Brandon A.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (194 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-07, Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertations Abstracts International85-07B.
標題:	Behavioral psychology. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9798381422795

Untangling Learning Agility : = Exploring Connections With Informal Learning, Personality, Reflective Thinking, and Motivation to Learn.
Smith, Brandon A.

Untangling Learning Agility :Exploring Connections With Informal Learning, Personality, Reflective Thinking, and Motivation to Learn. - 1 online resource (194 pages)

Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-07, Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Georgia, 2023.

Includes bibliographical references

Learning agility has gained significant traction within organizational talent management. This trend is not surprising, given that meta-analytic reviews have indicated that learning agility is a strong predictor of leadership performance and potential. Yet, despite significant empirical findings, critics have argued that learning agility is conceptually unclear and lacks a solid theoretical basis. This study aimed to add conceptual clarity to the learning agility construct by examining learning agility's relationship to the theoretically connected concept of informal learning. It also investigated motivation to learn, reflective thinking, and personality as antecedents of learning agility and modeled the relationship between these constructs, learning agility, and informal learning. By modeling these variables' relationships, this study provided a better understanding of learning agility's nomological network.The following research questions guided this study: (1) To what extent, if any, does learning agility predict informal learning behaviors? (2) To what extent, if any, does learning agility predict informal learning behaviors beyond personality factors? (3) What is the relationship between and among motivation to learn, reflective thinking, personality, learning agility, and informal learning behaviors? This study analyzed secondary self-report survey data from 310 participants. Data analysis procedures entailed simple and multiple linear regression and path analysis.The study findings indicated that learning agility predicts informal learning behaviors and that learning agility predicts informal learning above and beyond personality factors. The hypothesized path model among study variables had poor model fit; however, a revised, more parsimonious path model consisting of openness to experience, extraversion, emotional stability, learning agility, motivation to learn, reflective thinking, and informal learning behaviors exhibited a favorable model fit and explained approximately 35.9% of the variation in informal learning behaviors. The study concluded that learning agility, as currently understood, lacks conceptual clarity and robust measurement. While learning agility predicted informal learning behaviors, the relationships were weak, and subdimensional relationships among study variables deviated from conceptual understanding. Therefore, the study results underscore the importance of developing more precise conceptual frameworks and measurement tools for learning agility. Overall, this research contributes to a more nuanced understanding of learning agility by providing a model elucidating the learning-from-experience process.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2024

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9798381422795Subjects--Topical Terms:

1179418
Behavioral psychology.
Subjects--Index Terms:

Informal learning behaviorsIndex Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Untangling Learning Agility : = Exploring Connections With Informal Learning, Personality, Reflective Thinking, and Motivation to Learn.
LDR:04142ntm a22004097 4500 001 1149659
005 20241022112608.5
006 m o d
007 cr bn ---uuuuu
008 250605s2023 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9798381422795
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI30690601
035 $a AAI30690601
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ $d NTU
100 1 $a Smith, Brandon A. $3 1475975
245 1 0 $a Untangling Learning Agility : $b Exploring Connections With Informal Learning, Personality, Reflective Thinking, and Motivation to Learn.
264 0 $c 2023
300 $a 1 online resource (194 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertations Abstracts International, Volume: 85-07, Section: B.
500 $a Advisor: Watkins, Karen E.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Georgia, 2023.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Learning agility has gained significant traction within organizational talent management. This trend is not surprising, given that meta-analytic reviews have indicated that learning agility is a strong predictor of leadership performance and potential. Yet, despite significant empirical findings, critics have argued that learning agility is conceptually unclear and lacks a solid theoretical basis. This study aimed to add conceptual clarity to the learning agility construct by examining learning agility's relationship to the theoretically connected concept of informal learning. It also investigated motivation to learn, reflective thinking, and personality as antecedents of learning agility and modeled the relationship between these constructs, learning agility, and informal learning. By modeling these variables' relationships, this study provided a better understanding of learning agility's nomological network.The following research questions guided this study: (1) To what extent, if any, does learning agility predict informal learning behaviors? (2) To what extent, if any, does learning agility predict informal learning behaviors beyond personality factors? (3) What is the relationship between and among motivation to learn, reflective thinking, personality, learning agility, and informal learning behaviors? This study analyzed secondary self-report survey data from 310 participants. Data analysis procedures entailed simple and multiple linear regression and path analysis.The study findings indicated that learning agility predicts informal learning behaviors and that learning agility predicts informal learning above and beyond personality factors. The hypothesized path model among study variables had poor model fit; however, a revised, more parsimonious path model consisting of openness to experience, extraversion, emotional stability, learning agility, motivation to learn, reflective thinking, and informal learning behaviors exhibited a favorable model fit and explained approximately 35.9% of the variation in informal learning behaviors. The study concluded that learning agility, as currently understood, lacks conceptual clarity and robust measurement. While learning agility predicted informal learning behaviors, the relationships were weak, and subdimensional relationships among study variables deviated from conceptual understanding. Therefore, the study results underscore the importance of developing more precise conceptual frameworks and measurement tools for learning agility. Overall, this research contributes to a more nuanced understanding of learning agility by providing a model elucidating the learning-from-experience process.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2024
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Behavioral psychology. $3 1179418
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 555103
650 4 $a Personality psychology. $3 1180475
650 4 $a Adult education. $3 555548
653 $a Informal learning behaviors
653 $a Learning agility
653 $a Motivation
653 $a Personality
653 $a Reflective thinking
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0516
690 $a 0525
690 $a 0625
690 $a 0384
710 2 $a University of Georgia. $b Learning, Leadership and Organization Development - PHD. $3 1475976
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
773 0 $t Dissertations Abstracts International $g 85-07B.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=30690601 $z click for full text (PQDT)