國立虎尾科技大學 |

A model of joint action for literacy coaching with video self-reflection.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,印刷品 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	A model of joint action for literacy coaching with video self-reflection./
作者:	Reichenberg, Jennifer Sharples.
出版者:	Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, : 2017,
面頁冊數:	240 p.
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-07(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-07A(E).
標題:	English as a second language. -
電子資源:	http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10244672
ISBN:	9781369592740

A model of joint action for literacy coaching with video self-reflection.
Reichenberg, Jennifer Sharples.

A model of joint action for literacy coaching with video self-reflection. - Ann Arbor : ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, 2017 - 240 p.

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-07(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Buffalo, 2017.

The purpose of this study was to explore the nature of mediation by a reflective framework, video, and a literacy coach and the impact of this mediation on the reflective stance of secondary level teachers of ELLs. Analysis of the data showed that each step in the reflective framework acted as a unifying tool that helped determine how the video and the coach were taken up in different types of joint action by the teacher and coach. These types of action included making suggestions, building on each other's ideas, revoicing and reconceptualizing ideas, asking questions to develop understanding, asking questions to introduce dissonance, and disagreeing with each other. A closer analysis of these actions revealed that they could each be classified along two axes, a responsive/directive axis and a consonant/dissonant axis, suggesting a Model of Joint Action for Literacy Coaching With Video Self-Reflection. The four quadrants created by the intersection of the axes represent four categories of joint action in the model: directive/consonant, directive/dissonant, responsive/consonant, and responsive/dissonant. These categories of action existed both within coaching session dialogue and within classroom visits, suggesting that the model is useful across contexts and may support the embodied nature of professional learning by teachers. Movement of the joint action of the teacher and coach among these four quadrants was informed by contexts, both dynamic and historical, which can be plotted on a third axis representing time. Finally, action during both coaching sessions and classroom visits led to changes in teachers' thinking and practice during the study, indicating that a model of joint action that accounts for the role of responsiveness/directiveness, consonance/dissonance, and time may be useful to inform diverse approaches to professional development.

ISBN: 9781369592740Subjects--Topical Terms:

1148422
English as a second language.

A model of joint action for literacy coaching with video self-reflection.
LDR:02877nam a2200313 4500 001 890653
005 20180727091501.5
008 180907s2017 ||||||||||||||||| ||eng d
020 $a 9781369592740
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10244672
035 $a (MiAaPQ)buffalo:14906
035 $a AAI10244672
040 $a MiAaPQ $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Reichenberg, Jennifer Sharples. $0 (orcid)0000-0001-9391-3033 $3 1148474
245 1 2 $a A model of joint action for literacy coaching with video self-reflection.
260 1 $a Ann Arbor : $b ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, $c 2017
300 $a 240 p.
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-07(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Fenice B. Boyd; Mary B. McVee.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--State University of New York at Buffalo, 2017.
520 $a The purpose of this study was to explore the nature of mediation by a reflective framework, video, and a literacy coach and the impact of this mediation on the reflective stance of secondary level teachers of ELLs. Analysis of the data showed that each step in the reflective framework acted as a unifying tool that helped determine how the video and the coach were taken up in different types of joint action by the teacher and coach. These types of action included making suggestions, building on each other's ideas, revoicing and reconceptualizing ideas, asking questions to develop understanding, asking questions to introduce dissonance, and disagreeing with each other. A closer analysis of these actions revealed that they could each be classified along two axes, a responsive/directive axis and a consonant/dissonant axis, suggesting a Model of Joint Action for Literacy Coaching With Video Self-Reflection. The four quadrants created by the intersection of the axes represent four categories of joint action in the model: directive/consonant, directive/dissonant, responsive/consonant, and responsive/dissonant. These categories of action existed both within coaching session dialogue and within classroom visits, suggesting that the model is useful across contexts and may support the embodied nature of professional learning by teachers. Movement of the joint action of the teacher and coach among these four quadrants was informed by contexts, both dynamic and historical, which can be plotted on a third axis representing time. Finally, action during both coaching sessions and classroom visits led to changes in teachers' thinking and practice during the study, indicating that a model of joint action that accounts for the role of responsiveness/directiveness, consonance/dissonance, and time may be useful to inform diverse approaches to professional development.
590 $a School code: 0656.
650 4 $a English as a second language. $3 1148422
650 4 $a Reading instruction. $3 1148440
650 4 $a Educational technology. $3 556755
690 $a 0441
690 $a 0535
690 $a 0710
710 2 $a State University of New York at Buffalo. $b Learning and Instruction. $3 1148475
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-07A(E).
790 $a 0656
791 $a Ph.D.
792 $a 2017
793 $a English
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10244672