國立虎尾科技大學 |

Toward a Systemic Model for Governance and Strategic Management : = Evaluating Stakeholder Theory Versus Shareholder Theory Approaches.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Toward a Systemic Model for Governance and Strategic Management :/
其他題名:	Evaluating Stakeholder Theory Versus Shareholder Theory Approaches.
作者:	Stikeleather, James A.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (498 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-05(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-05A(E).
標題:	Business administration. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355490862

Toward a Systemic Model for Governance and Strategic Management : = Evaluating Stakeholder Theory Versus Shareholder Theory Approaches.
Stikeleather, James A.

Toward a Systemic Model for Governance and Strategic Management :Evaluating Stakeholder Theory Versus Shareholder Theory Approaches. - 1 online resource (498 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-05(E), Section: A.

Thesis (D.B.A.)

Includes bibliographical references

The research's intent is improvement in governance and strategic management initially by comparing Shareholder Theory and Stakeholder Theory and making results useful for both Practitioner and Academic audiences. A conceptual model for how a society establishes and evolves the roles it legitimizes for a business to support reasoning about those roles and the process originating the expectations, responsibilities, obligations, contributions and freedom to act in the roles is proposed. Understanding this process would enable better governance and strategic management of a firm while avoiding unintended consequences when fulfilling the role and consequences for failing the role. The model becomes a basis for comparing Shareholder and Stakeholder Theories.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355490862Subjects--Topical Terms:

1148568
Business administration.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Toward a Systemic Model for Governance and Strategic Management : = Evaluating Stakeholder Theory Versus Shareholder Theory Approaches.
LDR:03837ntm a2200385Ki 4500 001 910126
005 20180511093035.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355490862
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10690475
035 $a (MiAaPQ)usf:14360
035 $a AAI10690475
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
099 $a TUL $f hyy $c available through World Wide Web
100 1 $a Stikeleather, James A. $3 1181215
245 1 0 $a Toward a Systemic Model for Governance and Strategic Management : $b Evaluating Stakeholder Theory Versus Shareholder Theory Approaches.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (498 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-05(E), Section: A.
500 $a Advisers: Moez Limayem; Richard Plank.
502 $a Thesis (D.B.A.) $c University of South Florida $d 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The research's intent is improvement in governance and strategic management initially by comparing Shareholder Theory and Stakeholder Theory and making results useful for both Practitioner and Academic audiences. A conceptual model for how a society establishes and evolves the roles it legitimizes for a business to support reasoning about those roles and the process originating the expectations, responsibilities, obligations, contributions and freedom to act in the roles is proposed. Understanding this process would enable better governance and strategic management of a firm while avoiding unintended consequences when fulfilling the role and consequences for failing the role. The model becomes a basis for comparing Shareholder and Stakeholder Theories.
520 $a Context for the model comes from practitioner narratives around changes occurring in business and their themes around the relationship of a business with its ecosystem. To incorporate both the societal and business relationship components, the model building process was based upon concepts and ideas from General Systems, Economics, Sociology, Neuroscience, Philosophy, Evolution, Complexity and Complex Adaptive Systems, Semiotics, as well as Business. This was an iterative abductive, inductive, deductive process with each iteration compared to relevant theory, integrated across the subject domains, then tested against other academic research on the issue, evidence of the model in practice, and a culturomics study across social and industry literature.
520 $a These results are exploratory, descriptive, directional, and suggestive for future research opportunities. Problems with Stakeholder Theory are identified but potentially addressed with the conceptual model, in turn suggesting a systemic approach to governance and strategic management. It was determined that Shareholder Theory results in many unintended consequences detrimental to society and the firm. The conceptual model provides points of intervention in the process and suggests potential tooling for governance and strategic management.
520 $a A side effect of the research was a perspective on the practitioner / academic divide as the research grappled with the "wicked problem" nature and transdisciplinary nature of process being described. By introducing systems and complexity paradigms in the model, potential ways to address the divide are suggested, such as 3 level analysis (micro, meso, macro).
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Business administration. $3 1148568
650 4 $a Management. $3 558618
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0310
690 $a 0454
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of South Florida. $b Business Administration. $3 1181134
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-05A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10690475 $z click for full text (PQDT)