國立虎尾科技大學 |

Rethinking residue an investigation of pharyngeal residue on flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing : = The past, present, and future directions.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Rethinking residue an investigation of pharyngeal residue on flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing :/
其他題名:	The past, present, and future directions.
作者:	Pisegna, Jessica M.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (171 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-07(E), Section: B.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International78-07B(E).
標題:	Speech therapy. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781369654875

Rethinking residue an investigation of pharyngeal residue on flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing : = The past, present, and future directions.
Pisegna, Jessica M.

Rethinking residue an investigation of pharyngeal residue on flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing :The past, present, and future directions. - 1 online resource (171 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-07(E), Section: B.

Thesis (Ph.D.)

Includes bibliographical references

This dissertation investigated measures of pharyngeal residue as seen on flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). Research in this area of deglutology has been stalled due to measurement problems. The particular aims of this project were to compare visual analog scale ratings to categorical ratings of residue on FEES, and to investigate various measurement aspects.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781369654875Subjects--Topical Terms:

715798
Speech therapy.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Rethinking residue an investigation of pharyngeal residue on flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing : = The past, present, and future directions.
LDR:03758ntm a2200385Ki 4500 001 910160
005 20180511093052.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781369654875
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10255089
035 $a (MiAaPQ)bu:12639
035 $a AAI10255089
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
099 $a TUL $f hyy $c available through World Wide Web
100 1 $a Pisegna, Jessica M. $3 1181270
245 1 0 $a Rethinking residue an investigation of pharyngeal residue on flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing : $b The past, present, and future directions.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (171 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-07(E), Section: B.
500 $a Adviser: Susan E. Langmore.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.) $c Boston University $d 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This dissertation investigated measures of pharyngeal residue as seen on flexible endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). Research in this area of deglutology has been stalled due to measurement problems. The particular aims of this project were to compare visual analog scale ratings to categorical ratings of residue on FEES, and to investigate various measurement aspects.
520 $a Methods: Speech language pathologists were asked to rate residue from 81 swallows on FEES that demonstrated a wide range of residue severity for thin liquid, applesauce, and cracker boluses. A total of 33 clinicians rated the amount of residue at the time point after the first swallow, twice in a randomized fashion: the first time on a visual analog scale (VAS) and the second time categorically on a five point Likert scale. The results were analyzed for (1) inter/intra-rater agreement, (2) correlations between ratings and residue severity for each rating method, and (3) clusters of ratings to better define the scales and their clinical significance. A total of 2,673 VAS ratings and 2,673 categorical ratings were collected.
520 $a Results: (1) Both inter- and intra-rater reliability met acceptable levels of agreement, although intra-rater reliability on VAS ratings were slightly higher (rc=0.8--0.9) than categorical ratings (k=0.7--0.8). Expert ratings were not significantly different from other clinicians' ratings for any severity of any of the 3 boluses. (2) Residue ratings fit best on a curvilinear model; a quadratic fit of the data significantly improved the r2 values for each bolus type. (3) An increased residue amount, rated on either the VAS or categorical scale, was significantly associated with worse penetration-aspiration scale scores, but no significant relationship was found between the two methods of residue ratings and measures of quality of life or diet. Novel computerized methods are proposed for future measurement pursuits.
520 $a Conclusion: The results of this dissertation suggest that residue is best measured on a scale with unequal intervals, and clinicians can be reliable in rating overall amount of residue on FEES after the first swallow. Novel computerized measurement approaches are useful building blocks for future research. It is hoped that with better measurement will come better understanding of residue, its risks, and consequences.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Speech therapy. $3 715798
650 4 $a Medical imaging. $3 1180167
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0460
690 $a 0574
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Boston University. $b Sargent College of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences SAR. $3 1181271
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 78-07B(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10255089 $z click for full text (PQDT)