國立虎尾科技大學 |

Lexical Bundles in Applied Linguistics and Literature Writing : = A Comparison of Intermediate English Learners and Professionals.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Lexical Bundles in Applied Linguistics and Literature Writing :/
其他題名:	A Comparison of Intermediate English Learners and Professionals.
作者:	Johnston, Kathryn Marie.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (92 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-03.
Contained By:	Masters Abstracts International56-03(E).
標題:	English as a second language. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781369688528

Lexical Bundles in Applied Linguistics and Literature Writing : = A Comparison of Intermediate English Learners and Professionals.
Johnston, Kathryn Marie.

Lexical Bundles in Applied Linguistics and Literature Writing :A Comparison of Intermediate English Learners and Professionals. - 1 online resource (92 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-03.

Thesis (M.A.)

Includes bibliographical references

Lexical bundles (fixed sequences of three to four words) have been described as building blocks of discourse, both written and spoken (Biber & Barbieri, 2007), and as a useful mechanical device for creating writing that is suited for its academic field (Hyland, 2008). Having noticed that the academic theses of my students at Longdong University in Qingyang, China seemed very different from professional writing in their fields, I created a thesis project that addressed the question of how professionals in their fields were using bundles and how the learners' use of these bundles in terms of frequency, structure, and function varied from the professionals' use.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781369688528Subjects--Topical Terms:

1148422
English as a second language.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Lexical Bundles in Applied Linguistics and Literature Writing : = A Comparison of Intermediate English Learners and Professionals.
LDR:03435ntm a2200385Ki 4500 001 910388
005 20180517123954.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781369688528
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10250690
035 $a (MiAaPQ)psu:11744
035 $a AAI10250690
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
099 $a TUL $f hyy $c available through World Wide Web
100 1 $a Johnston, Kathryn Marie. $3 1181653
245 1 0 $a Lexical Bundles in Applied Linguistics and Literature Writing : $b A Comparison of Intermediate English Learners and Professionals.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (92 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-03.
500 $a Adviser: Susan M. Conrad.
502 $a Thesis (M.A.) $c Portland State University $d 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Lexical bundles (fixed sequences of three to four words) have been described as building blocks of discourse, both written and spoken (Biber & Barbieri, 2007), and as a useful mechanical device for creating writing that is suited for its academic field (Hyland, 2008). Having noticed that the academic theses of my students at Longdong University in Qingyang, China seemed very different from professional writing in their fields, I created a thesis project that addressed the question of how professionals in their fields were using bundles and how the learners' use of these bundles in terms of frequency, structure, and function varied from the professionals' use.
520 $a In order to answer this question, I compiled four corpora of writing in literature and applied linguistics, representing professional and learner writing in each field. I used concordancing software in order to identify four-word lexical bundles that occurred at least 20 times per 100,000 words and over a range of four texts. I then did a three-part analysis which looked at frequency, structure, and function of these bundles.
520 $a The results of the study reveal that professionals in applied linguistics and literature use bundles with different frequency, display different choices of lexical items to fill structural bundles, and use functional bundles differently. These differences seem to reflect the rhetorical needs of each discipline. Further, the learners in each field displayed differences in their use of bundles as compared to the professionals' use. Learners in applied linguistics used more types and tokens of bundles overall, while learners in literature used fewer. Both groups of learners relied more on repetitive use of certain bundles than did the professionals.
520 $a Implications of this study are discussed for teaching and curriculum development. The findings can be applied to teaching through creating awareness-raising and guided practice opportunities for the students to see how bundles are used in professional writing and to help them apply this understanding to their own writing.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a English as a second language. $3 1148422
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 557829
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0441
690 $a 0290
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Portland State University. $b Applied Linguistics (TESOL). $3 1181654
773 0 $t Masters Abstracts International $g 56-03(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10250690 $z click for full text (PQDT)