語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Digital Writing in the Academy : = G...
~
DiZio, Jennifer Katherine.
Digital Writing in the Academy : = Gains, Losses, and Rigorous Playfulness.
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Digital Writing in the Academy :/
其他題名:
Gains, Losses, and Rigorous Playfulness.
作者:
DiZio, Jennifer Katherine.
面頁冊數:
1 online resource (144 pages)
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11(E), Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International78-11A(E).
標題:
Educational technology. -
電子資源:
click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9780355033229
Digital Writing in the Academy : = Gains, Losses, and Rigorous Playfulness.
DiZio, Jennifer Katherine.
Digital Writing in the Academy :
Gains, Losses, and Rigorous Playfulness. - 1 online resource (144 pages)
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11(E), Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)
Includes bibliographical references
The ethnographic study presented here documents emergent behaviors that arose when two multimodal composing and production tools - Collabosphere and Tumblr --- were used in three different college courses (Introductory Psychology, Education 1B, and College Writing 101). The work addresses how conceptions of writing in the college classroom and across disciplines shift, converge, and vary across courses and between disciplines. I use Engestrom's (1999) model of activity theory to show how the introduction of new tools pushed both students and teachers to think more broadly and creatively about how they compose and comport themselves in academic settings. Specifically, this work reveals instances of expansive transformation as two activity systems -- academic writing and digital writing -- converged in these classrooms. By documenting new approaches that students and teachers developed when using new tools in an academic setting, I hope to visualize new opportunities for university writing to expand and include new literacy practices.
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9780355033229Subjects--Topical Terms:
556755
Educational technology.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:
554714
Electronic books.
Digital Writing in the Academy : = Gains, Losses, and Rigorous Playfulness.
LDR
:04287ntm a2200373Ki 4500
001
910446
005
20180517123955.5
006
m o u
007
cr mn||||a|a||
008
190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9780355033229
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10280532
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)berkeley:16896
035
$a
AAI10280532
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
099
$a
TUL
$f
hyy
$c
available through World Wide Web
100
1
$a
DiZio, Jennifer Katherine.
$3
1181743
245
1 0
$a
Digital Writing in the Academy :
$b
Gains, Losses, and Rigorous Playfulness.
264
0
$c
2017
300
$a
1 online resource (144 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11(E), Section: A.
500
$a
Adviser: Glynda A. Hull.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)
$c
University of California, Berkeley
$d
2017.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
The ethnographic study presented here documents emergent behaviors that arose when two multimodal composing and production tools - Collabosphere and Tumblr --- were used in three different college courses (Introductory Psychology, Education 1B, and College Writing 101). The work addresses how conceptions of writing in the college classroom and across disciplines shift, converge, and vary across courses and between disciplines. I use Engestrom's (1999) model of activity theory to show how the introduction of new tools pushed both students and teachers to think more broadly and creatively about how they compose and comport themselves in academic settings. Specifically, this work reveals instances of expansive transformation as two activity systems -- academic writing and digital writing -- converged in these classrooms. By documenting new approaches that students and teachers developed when using new tools in an academic setting, I hope to visualize new opportunities for university writing to expand and include new literacy practices.
520
$a
This study documents how digital tools in the Academy were perceived, repurposed and used in a variety of different ways. I used a combination of interviews with faculty and students, observations, and analysis of semiotic materials to gain a holistic understanding of the dynamic activity systems at play in each setting, and across the university. Specifically, I endeavored to document the types of expectations placed on undergraduate students and faculty to use digital tools in innovative and compelling ways, and how those expectations informed how both approached composing in their courses. Here I strove to understand the new demands on college writers within different disciplinary departments, new kinds of audiences, and new kinds of texts as students collaboratively composed. This study also conceives to help educators and teaching faculty think about what kinds of methods, rubrics and assessment frameworks would help support students using new tools for writing in college classrooms.
520
$a
One of the central findings of this study is that in order to make room for expansive learning and new systems of writing to emerge, teachers must make explicit the course goals and assessment models for grading and evaluating digital and multimodal pieces. Without this framework, students often default to those writing models that were successful for them in the past, which were text-heavy and often discipline-specific. Further, teachers also need to help extend student's notions of communication to include the visual and aural in a way that is both meaningful and critical. This study showed that it was not enough for students to simply present and prioritize multimodal composing, but that students needed a conceptual frame to understand how and why composing in different modes supported their analytic reasoning, and feel confident in their ability to synthesize them into their composing work.
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2018
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
Educational technology.
$3
556755
650
4
$a
Educational sociology.
$3
555555
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
local
$3
554714
690
$a
0710
690
$a
0340
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
1178819
710
2
$a
University of California, Berkeley.
$b
Education.
$3
1181744
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
78-11A(E).
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10280532
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼[密碼必須為2種組合(英文和數字)及長度為10碼以上]
登入