國立虎尾科技大學 |

Mitigation in Spanish discourse : = Social and cognitive motivations, linguistic analyses, and effects on interaction and interlocutors.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Mitigation in Spanish discourse :/
其他題名:	Social and cognitive motivations, linguistic analyses, and effects on interaction and interlocutors.
作者:	Czerwionka, Lori Ann.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (260 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-12, Section: A, page: 4373.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International71-12A.
標題:	Linguistics. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781124281452

Mitigation in Spanish discourse : = Social and cognitive motivations, linguistic analyses, and effects on interaction and interlocutors.
Czerwionka, Lori Ann.

Mitigation in Spanish discourse :Social and cognitive motivations, linguistic analyses, and effects on interaction and interlocutors. - 1 online resource (260 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-12, Section: A, page: 4373.

Thesis (Ph.D.)

Includes bibliographical references

Mitigation is the modification of language in response to social or cognitive challenges (stressors) in contexts of linguistic interaction (Martinovski, Mao, Gratch, & Marsella 2005). Previous mitigation research has been largely from social perspectives, addressing the word or utterance levels of language. This dissertation presents an empirical study of mitigating language resulting from both a cognitive stressor (degree of uncertainty) and social stressor ( degree of imposition) in Spanish discourse, and the impacts of mitigation on interaction and interlocutors.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781124281452Subjects--Topical Terms:

557829
Linguistics.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Mitigation in Spanish discourse : = Social and cognitive motivations, linguistic analyses, and effects on interaction and interlocutors.
LDR:04006ntm a2200361Ki 4500 001 910652
005 20180517123958.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2010 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781124281452
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI3428999
035 $a AAI3428999
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
099 $a TUL $f hyy $c available through World Wide Web
100 1 $a Czerwionka, Lori Ann. $3 1182054
245 1 0 $a Mitigation in Spanish discourse : $b Social and cognitive motivations, linguistic analyses, and effects on interaction and interlocutors.
264 0 $c 2010
300 $a 1 online resource (260 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 71-12, Section: A, page: 4373.
500 $a Adviser: Dale A. Koike.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.) $c The University of Texas at Austin $d 2010.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a Mitigation is the modification of language in response to social or cognitive challenges (stressors) in contexts of linguistic interaction (Martinovski, Mao, Gratch, & Marsella 2005). Previous mitigation research has been largely from social perspectives, addressing the word or utterance levels of language. This dissertation presents an empirical study of mitigating language resulting from both a cognitive stressor (degree of uncertainty) and social stressor ( degree of imposition) in Spanish discourse, and the impacts of mitigation on interaction and interlocutors.
520 $a The tripartite approach includes a: (1) quantitative analysis of discourse markers associated with mitigation (speaker-discourse, speaker-listener, and epistemic markers); (2) qualitative discourse analysis, relying on concepts from the Conversation Analysis framework; and (3) qualitative analysis of interlocutors' perceptions of mitigation, using metalinguistic conversations. The results are discussed considering prior research on mitigation, politeness theories, and Clark's (2006) model of 'language use' to address information types, interlocutor roles, and mutual knowledge. In addition, Caffi and Janney's (1994) 'anticipatory schemata' and Pinker's (2007) social psychological perspective of indirect language inform the theoretical framework. Results indicate that: (1) Mitigation devices vary depending on contextual factors prompting mitigation, significantly fewer speaker-listener markers are shown as evidence of mitigation, and epistemic markers, which are commonly analyzed mitigation devices, are infrequent overall in these data. These results provide evidence against the assumption that mitigation is associated with increased use of linguistic devices; (2) Two mitigating discourse structures were found, depending on the degree of uncertainty. Within contexts of high-imposition, the Co-reconstruction structure (CRS) is found in contexts with uncertainty and the Non-linear structure (NLS) is in contexts with certainty; and (3) The listeners' metalinguistic comments indicate that the CRS, compared to the NLS, is preferred. Also, the results indicate how interlocutors address cognitive, social, and emotional stressors in interaction.
520 $a Considering all analyses, a unifying definition of mitigation in discourse is provided. This phenomenon is characterized as the postponement of both confirmed knowledge and negotiation of the interlocutor relationship. This research contributes the first experimental investigation of mitigation as the result of cognitive and social stressors, and also the first systematic analysis of mitigation in Spanish discourse.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Linguistics. $3 557829
650 4 $a Social psychology. $3 554804
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0290
690 $a 0451
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a The University of Texas at Austin. $3 1182055
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 71-12A.
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=3428999 $z click for full text (PQDT)