國立虎尾科技大學 |

Student Metacognitive Responses to Feedback : = A Multiple Case Study.

Record Type:	Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:	Student Metacognitive Responses to Feedback :/
Reminder of title:	A Multiple Case Study.
Author:	DeMello, Kate.
Description:	1 online resource (149 pages)
Notes:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:	Dissertation Abstracts International79-01A(E).
Subject:	Education. -
Online resource:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355160536

Student Metacognitive Responses to Feedback : = A Multiple Case Study.
DeMello, Kate.

Student Metacognitive Responses to Feedback :A Multiple Case Study. - 1 online resource (149 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)

Includes bibliographical references

This study explored how undergraduate students perceive, self-regulate, and respond to feedback from instructors on written work. The general problem was that students in college are not prepared to practice metacognitive regulation to promote learning, particularly in the context of utilizing instructor feedback on written work to improve their submissions. The specific problem was that students often lack the metacognitive regulatory skills to implement the feedback they receive. Subjects for this study were a sample of instructors at a private Bible college who provide quality feedback on written work and their undergraduate students. This qualitative multiple case study approach examined student's perceptions of feedback from instructors on written drafts through think-aloud sessions. Student revisions of their drafts following feedback were compared to previous drafts using document analysis. Finally, semi-structured interviews took place to investigate how undergraduate students perceive, self-regulate, and respond to feed up, feed forward, and feed back from their instructors.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355160536Subjects--Topical Terms:

555912
Education.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Student Metacognitive Responses to Feedback : = A Multiple Case Study.
LDR:02406ntm a2200361Ki 4500 001 911075
005 20180517121919.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355160536
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10283234
035 $a (MiAaPQ)northcentral:11965
035 $a AAI10283234
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
099 $a TUL $f hyy $c available through World Wide Web
100 1 $a DeMello, Kate. $3 1182697
245 1 0 $a Student Metacognitive Responses to Feedback : $b A Multiple Case Study.
264 0 $c 2017
300 $a 1 online resource (149 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Janet Strickland.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.) $c Northcentral University $d 2017.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This study explored how undergraduate students perceive, self-regulate, and respond to feedback from instructors on written work. The general problem was that students in college are not prepared to practice metacognitive regulation to promote learning, particularly in the context of utilizing instructor feedback on written work to improve their submissions. The specific problem was that students often lack the metacognitive regulatory skills to implement the feedback they receive. Subjects for this study were a sample of instructors at a private Bible college who provide quality feedback on written work and their undergraduate students. This qualitative multiple case study approach examined student's perceptions of feedback from instructors on written drafts through think-aloud sessions. Student revisions of their drafts following feedback were compared to previous drafts using document analysis. Finally, semi-structured interviews took place to investigate how undergraduate students perceive, self-regulate, and respond to feed up, feed forward, and feed back from their instructors.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Education. $3 555912
650 4 $a Teacher education. $3 1148451
650 4 $a Educational psychology. $3 555103
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0515
690 $a 0530
690 $a 0525
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Northcentral University. $b Education. $3 1148427
773 0 $t Dissertation Abstracts International $g 79-01A(E).
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10283234 $z click for full text (PQDT)