語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Science Teachers' Epistemic Cognitio...
~
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
Science Teachers' Epistemic Cognition in Instructional Decision Making.
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Science Teachers' Epistemic Cognition in Instructional Decision Making./
作者:
Ponnock, Annette R.
面頁冊數:
1 online resource (166 pages)
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International79-01A(E).
標題:
Educational psychology. -
電子資源:
click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9780355171556
Science Teachers' Epistemic Cognition in Instructional Decision Making.
Ponnock, Annette R.
Science Teachers' Epistemic Cognition in Instructional Decision Making.
- 1 online resource (166 pages)
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)
Includes bibliographical references
One understudied barrier to science education reform concerns teachers' cognitive processes and how they relate to instructional decision-making. Epistemic cognition---teachers' beliefs about knowledge and knowledge acquisition and goals for their students' knowledge acquisition---could provide important insights into the choices science teachers make in the classroom and why they might and might not adopt different instructional practices. Previous research has found mixed results regarding the relationship between beliefs and practice. Uniquely, science teachers encounter epistemic beliefs from both science and education, with potential differences that may need to be negotiated. This study found significant differences between the two belief systems but failed to find differences between biology, chemistry, physics, and Earth science. Three profiles were identified that were significantly different on their epistemic beliefs in the natural sciences and the learning sciences. Those in the naive profile (highest beliefs in certainty of knowledge, authority as source of knowledge, and attainability of truth) had significantly less self-efficacy than those in the sophisticated profile, which predicted lower frequency of investigative teaching practices and practices promoting an investigative culture. Those in the flexible profile (medium beliefs in certainty of knowledge, authority as source of knowledge, and attainability of truth) used practices promoting an investigative culture significantly less frequently than those in the sophisticated profile. The findings from this study add to the literature on epistemic cognition and its influences.
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9780355171556Subjects--Topical Terms:
555103
Educational psychology.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:
554714
Electronic books.
Science Teachers' Epistemic Cognition in Instructional Decision Making.
LDR
:02982ntm a2200373Ki 4500
001
911084
005
20180517121919.5
006
m o u
007
cr mn||||a|a||
008
190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9780355171556
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10288858
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)temple:13014
035
$a
AAI10288858
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
099
$a
TUL
$f
hyy
$c
available through World Wide Web
100
1
$a
Ponnock, Annette R.
$3
1182710
245
1 0
$a
Science Teachers' Epistemic Cognition in Instructional Decision Making.
264
0
$c
2017
300
$a
1 online resource (166 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-01(E), Section: A.
500
$a
Adviser: Avi Kaplan.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)
$c
Temple University
$d
2017.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
One understudied barrier to science education reform concerns teachers' cognitive processes and how they relate to instructional decision-making. Epistemic cognition---teachers' beliefs about knowledge and knowledge acquisition and goals for their students' knowledge acquisition---could provide important insights into the choices science teachers make in the classroom and why they might and might not adopt different instructional practices. Previous research has found mixed results regarding the relationship between beliefs and practice. Uniquely, science teachers encounter epistemic beliefs from both science and education, with potential differences that may need to be negotiated. This study found significant differences between the two belief systems but failed to find differences between biology, chemistry, physics, and Earth science. Three profiles were identified that were significantly different on their epistemic beliefs in the natural sciences and the learning sciences. Those in the naive profile (highest beliefs in certainty of knowledge, authority as source of knowledge, and attainability of truth) had significantly less self-efficacy than those in the sophisticated profile, which predicted lower frequency of investigative teaching practices and practices promoting an investigative culture. Those in the flexible profile (medium beliefs in certainty of knowledge, authority as source of knowledge, and attainability of truth) used practices promoting an investigative culture significantly less frequently than those in the sophisticated profile. The findings from this study add to the literature on epistemic cognition and its influences.
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2018
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
Educational psychology.
$3
555103
650
4
$a
Education.
$3
555912
650
4
$a
Psychology.
$3
555998
650
4
$a
Science education.
$3
1151737
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
local
$3
554714
690
$a
0525
690
$a
0515
690
$a
0621
690
$a
0714
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
1178819
710
2
$a
Temple University.
$b
Educational Psychology.
$3
1182711
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
79-01A(E).
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10288858
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼[密碼必須為2種組合(英文和數字)及長度為10碼以上]
登入