Language:
English
繁體中文
Help
Login
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
L2 Learners' Perceptions and Prefere...
~
Alsallami, Nawaf.
L2 Learners' Perceptions and Preferences of Automated Corrective Feedback.
Record Type:
Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
L2 Learners' Perceptions and Preferences of Automated Corrective Feedback./
Author:
Alsallami, Nawaf.
Description:
1 online resource (204 pages)
Notes:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11(E), Section: A.
Contained By:
Dissertation Abstracts International78-11A(E).
Subject:
English as a second language. -
Online resource:
click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9781369879117
L2 Learners' Perceptions and Preferences of Automated Corrective Feedback.
Alsallami, Nawaf.
L2 Learners' Perceptions and Preferences of Automated Corrective Feedback.
- 1 online resource (204 pages)
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11(E), Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)
Includes bibliographical references
Form-focused automated Corrective Feedback (CF) is widely used in general-purpose and specialized writing software and research indicates a positive effect for automated CF on second language (L2) learning (AbuSeileek, 2013; AbuSeileek & Abualsha'r, 2014). As any educational practice, preferences and perceptions of learners are expected to influence how automated CF is used by L2 learners (Amrhein & Nassaji, 2010; Brown, 2009; Schulz, 2001). However, preferences and perceptions of automated CF are poorly understood due to paucity of relevant research. This study contributes to this line of investigation by exploring three pertinent topics. First, it explores L2 learners' preferences and perceptions of automated CF and four different CF strategies: identification, direct correction, metalinguistic CF, and graduated CF. Second, it examines learners' preferences between different CF timings and frequency choices. Third, it explores learners' past experience with AWE tools and investigates if past Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) experience affects learners' preferences and perceptions of automated CF.
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9781369879117Subjects--Topical Terms:
1148422
English as a second language.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:
554714
Electronic books.
L2 Learners' Perceptions and Preferences of Automated Corrective Feedback.
LDR
:04240ntm a2200373Ki 4500
001
911810
005
20180531103647.5
006
m o u
007
cr mn||||a|a||
008
190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9781369879117
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10263373
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)iastate:16319
035
$a
AAI10263373
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
099
$a
TUL
$f
hyy
$c
available through World Wide Web
100
1
$a
Alsallami, Nawaf.
$3
1183869
245
1 0
$a
L2 Learners' Perceptions and Preferences of Automated Corrective Feedback.
264
0
$c
2017
300
$a
1 online resource (204 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-11(E), Section: A.
500
$a
Adviser: Volker H. Hegelheimer.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)
$c
Iowa State University
$d
2017.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
Form-focused automated Corrective Feedback (CF) is widely used in general-purpose and specialized writing software and research indicates a positive effect for automated CF on second language (L2) learning (AbuSeileek, 2013; AbuSeileek & Abualsha'r, 2014). As any educational practice, preferences and perceptions of learners are expected to influence how automated CF is used by L2 learners (Amrhein & Nassaji, 2010; Brown, 2009; Schulz, 2001). However, preferences and perceptions of automated CF are poorly understood due to paucity of relevant research. This study contributes to this line of investigation by exploring three pertinent topics. First, it explores L2 learners' preferences and perceptions of automated CF and four different CF strategies: identification, direct correction, metalinguistic CF, and graduated CF. Second, it examines learners' preferences between different CF timings and frequency choices. Third, it explores learners' past experience with AWE tools and investigates if past Automated Writing Evaluation (AWE) experience affects learners' preferences and perceptions of automated CF.
520
$a
To accomplish these objectives, the present study surveyed and interviewed 30 learners at an intermediate to advanced English as Second Language (ESL) proficiency level. It calculated descriptive statistics of the surveys and employed exploratory factor analysis to identify the underlying relationships between different variables measured by the survey. For interview analysis, it employed a grounded theory approach to identify major concerns and perceptions of automated CF not accounted for in the survey. Results revealed a strong preference for direct correction followed by metalinguistic CF, identification, and graduated CF respectively. Factor analysis identified a close association between clarity and usefulness perceptions and preferences for CF strategies, between comprehensive CF and direct correction and between the frequency of AWE use and identification. The interviews revealed two major concerns with potential influence on preferences for CF strategies: time and learning. Based on preference data, the time required to use CF successfully for error correction is a more important factor for most learners than learning from CF. In other words, CF strategy preferences appear to be mainly shaped by the time factor. This dissertation concludes with specific implications of these findings for developers of AWE tools and L2 educators. Specifically, developers should be mindful of the wide range of concerns that shape L2 learners' preferences and perceptions of CF in order to design and deliver CF that is timely, desirable, and positively perceived by L2 learners. Furthermore, L2 educators should exert the effort to mitigate L2 learners' concerns that undermine the value of CF qualities and strategies that were empirically proven to be effective for L2 development.
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2018
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
English as a second language.
$3
1148422
650
4
$a
Linguistics.
$3
557829
650
4
$a
Language.
$3
571568
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
local
$3
554714
690
$a
0441
690
$a
0290
690
$a
0679
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
1178819
710
2
$a
Iowa State University.
$b
English.
$3
1179946
773
0
$t
Dissertation Abstracts International
$g
78-11A(E).
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10263373
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
based on 0 review(s)
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login