Language:
English
繁體中文
Help
Login
Back
Switch To:
Labeled
|
MARC Mode
|
ISBD
Influence of Poor Fit Vowels on Perc...
~
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Influence of Poor Fit Vowels on Perception of Consonants.
Record Type:
Language materials, manuscript : Monograph/item
Title/Author:
Influence of Poor Fit Vowels on Perception of Consonants./
Author:
Muratani, Yuka.
Description:
1 online resource (66 pages)
Notes:
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-06.
Contained By:
Masters Abstracts International56-06(E).
Subject:
Linguistics. -
Online resource:
click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9780355180909
Influence of Poor Fit Vowels on Perception of Consonants.
Muratani, Yuka.
Influence of Poor Fit Vowels on Perception of Consonants.
- 1 online resource (66 pages)
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-06.
Thesis (M.A.)
Includes bibliographical references
The present study investigated native English listeners' perception of an ambiguous fricative noise from a [s]-[?] continuum followed/preceded by a poor fit vowel---either one of the [i]s that have higher/lower formant frequencies than a good exemplar of English [i], or [u]s that have higher/lower formant frequencies than a good exemplar of English [u]. The main questions that the present study intended to address were, i) whether listeners would show perceptual contextual dissimilation (a.k.a. compensation for coarticulation, Mann & Repp, 1980, 1981) or listeners would show perceptual contextual assimilation (a.k.a. parsing, Fowler, 1984); and ii) whether listeners would respond to the stimuli according to their phonological analysis of the segments (Kingston et al., 2011) or according to the actual phonetic details of the segments (Whalen, 1989). The results were that the listeners showed perceptual contextual dissimilation for their broad (more abstract) phonological categorization of [i] and [u]. However, when the listeners were sensitive to the phonetic details of the segments, the listeners showed perceptual contextual assimilation. The listeners somehow, however, were not sensitive to the phonetic details of poor fit vowels when the stimuli were identified as [si] and [?i]. Although it is hard to come to a solid conclusion from these response patterns, the results at least indicate that listeners may be able to parse vowels using their native language knowledge, and dynamically adjust the acoustic discrepancy by showing perceptual contextual assimilation.
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9780355180909Subjects--Topical Terms:
557829
Linguistics.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:
554714
Electronic books.
Influence of Poor Fit Vowels on Perception of Consonants.
LDR
:02828ntm a2200337Ki 4500
001
911880
005
20180531103648.5
006
m o u
007
cr mn||||a|a||
008
190606s2017 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9780355180909
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10607470
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)unc:17287
035
$a
AAI10607470
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
099
$a
TUL
$f
hyy
$c
available through World Wide Web
100
1
$a
Muratani, Yuka.
$3
1183987
245
1 0
$a
Influence of Poor Fit Vowels on Perception of Consonants.
264
0
$c
2017
300
$a
1 online resource (66 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 56-06.
500
$a
Adviser: Alfred E. Moreton.
502
$a
Thesis (M.A.)
$c
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
$d
2017.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
The present study investigated native English listeners' perception of an ambiguous fricative noise from a [s]-[?] continuum followed/preceded by a poor fit vowel---either one of the [i]s that have higher/lower formant frequencies than a good exemplar of English [i], or [u]s that have higher/lower formant frequencies than a good exemplar of English [u]. The main questions that the present study intended to address were, i) whether listeners would show perceptual contextual dissimilation (a.k.a. compensation for coarticulation, Mann & Repp, 1980, 1981) or listeners would show perceptual contextual assimilation (a.k.a. parsing, Fowler, 1984); and ii) whether listeners would respond to the stimuli according to their phonological analysis of the segments (Kingston et al., 2011) or according to the actual phonetic details of the segments (Whalen, 1989). The results were that the listeners showed perceptual contextual dissimilation for their broad (more abstract) phonological categorization of [i] and [u]. However, when the listeners were sensitive to the phonetic details of the segments, the listeners showed perceptual contextual assimilation. The listeners somehow, however, were not sensitive to the phonetic details of poor fit vowels when the stimuli were identified as [si] and [?i]. Although it is hard to come to a solid conclusion from these response patterns, the results at least indicate that listeners may be able to parse vowels using their native language knowledge, and dynamically adjust the acoustic discrepancy by showing perceptual contextual assimilation.
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2018
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
Linguistics.
$3
557829
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
local
$3
554714
690
$a
0290
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
1178819
710
2
$a
The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
$b
Linguistics.
$3
1182004
773
0
$t
Masters Abstracts International
$g
56-06(E).
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10607470
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
based on 0 review(s)
Multimedia
Reviews
Add a review
and share your thoughts with other readers
Export
pickup library
Processing
...
Change password
Login