國立虎尾科技大學 |

Survey results for the current state of censorship in adult psychiatric music therapy sessions.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Survey results for the current state of censorship in adult psychiatric music therapy sessions./
作者:	Joplin, Kendall.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (77 pages)
附註:	Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-05.
標題:	Music. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781339947341

Survey results for the current state of censorship in adult psychiatric music therapy sessions.
Joplin, Kendall.

Survey results for the current state of censorship in adult psychiatric music therapy sessions. - 1 online resource (77 pages)

Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-05.

Thesis (M.M.E.)--University of Kansas, 2016.

Includes bibliographical references

The purpose of this study was to investigate current censorship practices and beliefs of music therapists working in adult mental health settings. The research questions are: (a) What music, or elements of music, do music therapists censor during music therapy sessions? (b) If music therapists censor, what are their reasons for censoring? The participants for this study were 42 board-certified music therapists who completed an online survey investigating their current censorship practices within sessions. Censorship was broadly defined as music therapists refraining from using, or redirecting clients away from using, certain lyrics, themes, songs, or genres of music during therapist planning and facilitation of sessions. The majority of respondents (78.57%) censor at least one musical element, including themes (69.05%), lyrics (66.67%), and genres (16.67%). Reasons for censorship revolved around issues with treatment, including other group members' responses, client comfortableness, emotional distress, self-esteem issues, and negative impact on the therapeutic relationship. However, about 25% reported personal beliefs affected censorship, such as their comfort with the content, religious beliefs, and believing the client cannot benefit in any way from hearing the music. Further research needs to be conducted on how lyrics, themes, and genres impact clients, and if these elements facilitated by a music therapist could be used to address and work through some of the issues and concerns presented by the music.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781339947341Subjects--Topical Terms:

649088
Music.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Survey results for the current state of censorship in adult psychiatric music therapy sessions.
LDR:02724ntm a2200349K 4500 001 912955
005 20180614071643.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2016 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781339947341
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10139237
035 $a (MiAaPQ)ku:14617
035 $a AAI10139237
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Joplin, Kendall. $3 1185549
245 1 0 $a Survey results for the current state of censorship in adult psychiatric music therapy sessions.
264 0 $c 2016
300 $a 1 online resource (77 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Masters Abstracts International, Volume: 55-05.
500 $a Adviser: Abbey Dvorak.
502 $a Thesis (M.M.E.)--University of Kansas, 2016.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The purpose of this study was to investigate current censorship practices and beliefs of music therapists working in adult mental health settings. The research questions are: (a) What music, or elements of music, do music therapists censor during music therapy sessions? (b) If music therapists censor, what are their reasons for censoring? The participants for this study were 42 board-certified music therapists who completed an online survey investigating their current censorship practices within sessions. Censorship was broadly defined as music therapists refraining from using, or redirecting clients away from using, certain lyrics, themes, songs, or genres of music during therapist planning and facilitation of sessions. The majority of respondents (78.57%) censor at least one musical element, including themes (69.05%), lyrics (66.67%), and genres (16.67%). Reasons for censorship revolved around issues with treatment, including other group members' responses, client comfortableness, emotional distress, self-esteem issues, and negative impact on the therapeutic relationship. However, about 25% reported personal beliefs affected censorship, such as their comfort with the content, religious beliefs, and believing the client cannot benefit in any way from hearing the music. Further research needs to be conducted on how lyrics, themes, and genres impact clients, and if these elements facilitated by a music therapist could be used to address and work through some of the issues and concerns presented by the music.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Music. $3 649088
650 4 $a Music education. $3 1179893
650 4 $a Mental health. $3 564038
650 4 $a Counseling Psychology. $3 1179619
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0413
690 $a 0522
690 $a 0347
690 $a 0603
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of Kansas. $b Music Education & Music Therapy. $3 1185550
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10139237 $z click for full text (PQDT)