國立虎尾科技大學 |

Restricting Teacher Collective Bargaining in Indiana : = Patterns and Potential Consequences.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Restricting Teacher Collective Bargaining in Indiana :/
其他題名:	Patterns and Potential Consequences.
作者:	Dunderdale, Tara Amber.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (275 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: A.
標題:	Education policy. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9780355478617

Restricting Teacher Collective Bargaining in Indiana : = Patterns and Potential Consequences.
Dunderdale, Tara Amber.

Restricting Teacher Collective Bargaining in Indiana :Patterns and Potential Consequences. - 1 online resource (275 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ed.D.)--The George Washington University, 2018.

Includes bibliographical references

In 2011, Indiana enacted Public Law 48-2011 restricting collective bargaining for teachers. This law restricted teacher contracts to a small number of provisions and prohibited many common items including class size or school-day length. All contracts entered after June 30, 2011 had to comply with the restrictions; however some districts entered new agreements before this deadline, effectively delaying the date by which they would need to comply. Around this same time, Indiana was experiencing a drop in teacher retention across the state, leading to potential staffing shortfalls.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9780355478617Subjects--Topical Terms:

1107727
Education policy.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Restricting Teacher Collective Bargaining in Indiana : = Patterns and Potential Consequences.
LDR:03584ntm a2200349K 4500 001 913120
005 20180614071649.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2018 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9780355478617
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10640633
035 $a (MiAaPQ)gwu:13848
035 $a AAI10640633
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Dunderdale, Tara Amber. $3 1185796
245 1 0 $a Restricting Teacher Collective Bargaining in Indiana : $b Patterns and Potential Consequences.
264 0 $c 2018
300 $a 1 online resource (275 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-03(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Yas A. Nakib.
502 $a Thesis (Ed.D.)--The George Washington University, 2018.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a In 2011, Indiana enacted Public Law 48-2011 restricting collective bargaining for teachers. This law restricted teacher contracts to a small number of provisions and prohibited many common items including class size or school-day length. All contracts entered after June 30, 2011 had to comply with the restrictions; however some districts entered new agreements before this deadline, effectively delaying the date by which they would need to comply. Around this same time, Indiana was experiencing a drop in teacher retention across the state, leading to potential staffing shortfalls.
520 $a Grounded in policy implementation, collective bargaining, and teacher turnover research, this study exploited staggered implementation of Public Law 48-2011 to examine the plausibility of a relationship between this policy change and the drop in teacher retention. The study looked at the following three elements: 1) the response of districts vis-a-vis collective bargaining in the interval between passage and implementation deadline; 2) the extent to which contracts entered after the deadline differed in terms of strength in the union's favor from contracts entered before implementation; and 3) the extent to which compliance with the restrictions correlated with teacher retention rates.
520 $a Several interesting findings are drawn from this study. First, many districts behaved as expected with regard to entering a new agreement before the deadline, but the probability was higher for some districts. Second, while the contracts entered before the law differed significantly from those entered afterward, there were no significant patterns in the magnitude of change across district groupings that the study utilized. Third, teacher retention declined in most districts over the examined time-period, but I found that districts entering a Post-Law contract had a lower rate of teacher retention. Collectively, these findings suggest that while there were substantive changes to contracts entered before and after the law, districts' initial responses did not explain variation in the size of that change. Further, there appears to be a correlational link between teacher attrition and adoption of a post-law contract. This study was not designed to draw causal links between the law and teacher turnover, however results from the study lend plausibility that a relationship exists.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Education policy. $3 1107727
650 4 $a Labor relations. $3 1179301
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0458
690 $a 0629
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a The George Washington University. $b Educational Administration and Policy Studies. $3 1185797
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10640633 $z click for full text (PQDT)