國立虎尾科技大學 |

Response to Intervention : = The Link Between Specific Learning Disability and Special Education Services.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Response to Intervention :/
其他題名:	The Link Between Specific Learning Disability and Special Education Services.
作者:	Lemmond, Nancy L.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (101 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: A.
標題:	Special education. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781339661063

Response to Intervention : = The Link Between Specific Learning Disability and Special Education Services.
Lemmond, Nancy L.

Response to Intervention :The Link Between Specific Learning Disability and Special Education Services. - 1 online resource (101 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Colorado Colorado Springs, 2016.

Includes bibliographical references

The purpose of this quantitative study is to determine if there is a statistically significant difference in the percentage of students identified as Specific Learning Disability before and after states policy adoptions in Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Idaho, Louisiana, Rhode Island, and West Virginia that required the use of Response to Intervention (RtI) as the sole methodology for identifying students with Specific Learning Disability. Response to Intervention assumed a dominant role in education with the passage of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Identified as a method to intervene early with students who were not making adequate academic achievement, RtI found its way into special education law with the passage of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act in 2004 hereafter referred to as IDEA 2004. Referenced only once within IDEA 2004, RtI was adopted by seven states as the sole method for identifying students with a Specific Learning Disability. Response to Intervention is multifaceted and has components in both general education and special education. A full evaluation of the entire policy of Response to Intervention as it applies to K-12 public education should be undertaken to validate its applicability and its benefit to the K-12 learning environment in conjunction with its identification of Specific Learning Disability. For this policy evaluation, RtI was evaluated from the perspective of the identification of students with SLD and claims that Response to Intervention will reduce the number of referrals and students identified with Specific Learning Disability. A hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) study indicates a decrease in the percentage of students identified with Specific Learning Disability long before the Response to Intervention policy change and that rather than continuing to decrease, the percentages actually increase shortly after legislative requirements.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781339661063Subjects--Topical Terms:

567627
Special education.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Response to Intervention : = The Link Between Specific Learning Disability and Special Education Services.
LDR:03116ntm a2200313K 4500 001 913412
005 20180618095017.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2016 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781339661063
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10102298
035 $a (MiAaPQ)uccs:10139
035 $a AAI10102298
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Lemmond, Nancy L. $3 1186249
245 1 0 $a Response to Intervention : $b The Link Between Specific Learning Disability and Special Education Services.
264 0 $c 2016
300 $a 1 online resource (101 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 77-09(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Al Ramirez.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Colorado Colorado Springs, 2016.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The purpose of this quantitative study is to determine if there is a statistically significant difference in the percentage of students identified as Specific Learning Disability before and after states policy adoptions in Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Idaho, Louisiana, Rhode Island, and West Virginia that required the use of Response to Intervention (RtI) as the sole methodology for identifying students with Specific Learning Disability. Response to Intervention assumed a dominant role in education with the passage of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Identified as a method to intervene early with students who were not making adequate academic achievement, RtI found its way into special education law with the passage of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act in 2004 hereafter referred to as IDEA 2004. Referenced only once within IDEA 2004, RtI was adopted by seven states as the sole method for identifying students with a Specific Learning Disability. Response to Intervention is multifaceted and has components in both general education and special education. A full evaluation of the entire policy of Response to Intervention as it applies to K-12 public education should be undertaken to validate its applicability and its benefit to the K-12 learning environment in conjunction with its identification of Specific Learning Disability. For this policy evaluation, RtI was evaluated from the perspective of the identification of students with SLD and claims that Response to Intervention will reduce the number of referrals and students identified with Specific Learning Disability. A hierarchical linear modeling (HLM) study indicates a decrease in the percentage of students identified with Specific Learning Disability long before the Response to Intervention policy change and that rather than continuing to decrease, the percentages actually increase shortly after legislative requirements.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Special education. $3 567627
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0529
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of Colorado Colorado Springs. $b Educational Leadership. $3 1186250
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10102298 $z click for full text (PQDT)