國立虎尾科技大學 |

Prescribed curriculum, literacy, and the pedagogy of reading and writing.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Prescribed curriculum, literacy, and the pedagogy of reading and writing./
作者:	McBride, Laura Ann.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (140 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-02(E), Section: A.
標題:	Reading instruction. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781369178357

Prescribed curriculum, literacy, and the pedagogy of reading and writing.
McBride, Laura Ann.

Prescribed curriculum, literacy, and the pedagogy of reading and writing. - 1 online resource (140 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-02(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Texas A&M University - Commerce, 2016.

Includes bibliographical references

The purpose of my dissertation was to show how standardized testing has been the source of much angst for teachers, students, and parents alike. As such, in some schools and areas, students are failing to meet the minimum guidelines as set forth by the Federal Education Board in reading and writing. It was my assertion that the failure is brought about by the mandates of curriculum boards that require specific curriculum to be taught by its teachers. In turn, the curriculum presents significant challenges for teachers, and then funnels down to students. In doing so, we have seen scores that reflect the deficits these children have in these areas, as well as, their being underprepared, instead of over-prepared when they do attend institutes of higher learning.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781369178357Subjects--Topical Terms:

1148440
Reading instruction.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Prescribed curriculum, literacy, and the pedagogy of reading and writing.
LDR:03138ntm a2200361K 4500 001 913442
005 20180618095030.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2016 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781369178357
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10163063
035 $a (MiAaPQ)tamucommerce:10545
035 $a AAI10163063
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a McBride, Laura Ann. $3 1186292
245 1 0 $a Prescribed curriculum, literacy, and the pedagogy of reading and writing.
264 0 $c 2016
300 $a 1 online resource (140 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-02(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: Tabetha Adkins.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--Texas A&M University - Commerce, 2016.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The purpose of my dissertation was to show how standardized testing has been the source of much angst for teachers, students, and parents alike. As such, in some schools and areas, students are failing to meet the minimum guidelines as set forth by the Federal Education Board in reading and writing. It was my assertion that the failure is brought about by the mandates of curriculum boards that require specific curriculum to be taught by its teachers. In turn, the curriculum presents significant challenges for teachers, and then funnels down to students. In doing so, we have seen scores that reflect the deficits these children have in these areas, as well as, their being underprepared, instead of over-prepared when they do attend institutes of higher learning.
520 $a The study for my dissertation revolved around five sections: Primary materials, Critical Pedagogy, expert opinions, and the statistics of pass rates in reading and writing over the past two decades. The primary materials were actual documents (the lesson plans or curriculum) from a magnet school in Waco, Texas, and followed the common core as practiced by most schools during the 2013-2014 school year in Texas. It broke down each day of each semester in terms of what teachers are mandated to teach, and more importantly, what specific TEKS (Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills) and ELPS (English Language Proficiency Standards) must be covered.
520 $a Through my dissertation, I used as a lens, both critical pedagogy and current (as well as some past) research in the areas of reading and writing to argue that students all learn differently, how experts argued students learn to read and write, versus the way students have been taught to actually read and write, and the gaps that exist between the two or what the field said "we should be learning". The core curriculum documents have amplified the need for change at the heart of this issue.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Reading instruction. $3 1148440
650 4 $a Curriculum development. $3 1148494
650 4 $a Educational tests & measurements. $3 1180442
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0535
690 $a 0727
690 $a 0288
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a Texas A&M University - Commerce. $b English. $3 1186293
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10163063 $z click for full text (PQDT)