國立虎尾科技大學 |

REGIME LEGITIMACY IN CHINA AND NORTH KOREA : = A COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT (POLITICAL INTEGRATION, MODERNIZATION, MASS LINE).

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	REGIME LEGITIMACY IN CHINA AND NORTH KOREA :/
其他題名:	A COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT (POLITICAL INTEGRATION, MODERNIZATION, MASS LINE).
作者:	PARK, KYUNG AE.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (161 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 45-12, Section: A, page: 3695.
標題:	Marketing. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)

REGIME LEGITIMACY IN CHINA AND NORTH KOREA : = A COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT (POLITICAL INTEGRATION, MODERNIZATION, MASS LINE).
PARK, KYUNG AE.

REGIME LEGITIMACY IN CHINA AND NORTH KOREA :A COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT (POLITICAL INTEGRATION, MODERNIZATION, MASS LINE). - 1 online resource (161 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 45-12, Section: A, page: 3695.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Georgia, 1984.

Includes bibliographical references

The purpose of the present study is to compare and contrast the bases of regime legitimacy in the People's Republic of China and North Korea. It examines and evaluates various definitions of the term, "legitimacy", in an effort to introduce an alternative definition based on human needs. The suggested definition illuminates four bases of legitimacy (i.e., the political, ideological, economic, and social) and corresponding policy goals of a regime. The scope of this study, however, is limited to the assessment of the ideological and economic bases of legitimacy in China and North Korea. In order to compare the two socialist systems in terms of the ideological bases, the study analyses the strategies for achieving the goals of political integration and discusses their outcome. At the same time, the economic basis of legitimacy is addressed as the study examines the policies and institutional means intended to facilitate modernization in both countries. Then, an effort is made to discern and explain the similarities and differences between the two regimes in their strategies for legitimizing power and their outcome. In so doing, it attempts to show the relevance and significance of indigenous contextual variables in explaining various efforts designed to promote regime legitimacy. Finally, the study discusses the implications and prospects by analysing various possible future developments which might affect the present status of legitimacy in China and North Korea.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

Subjects--Topical Terms:

557931
Marketing.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

REGIME LEGITIMACY IN CHINA AND NORTH KOREA : = A COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT (POLITICAL INTEGRATION, MODERNIZATION, MASS LINE).
LDR:02566ntm a2200277K 4500 001 914642
005 20180724085442.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s1984 xx obm 000 0 eng d
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI8504629
035 $a AAI8504629
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a PARK, KYUNG AE. $3 1187950
245 1 0 $a REGIME LEGITIMACY IN CHINA AND NORTH KOREA : $b A COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT (POLITICAL INTEGRATION, MODERNIZATION, MASS LINE).
264 0 $c 1984
300 $a 1 online resource (161 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 45-12, Section: A, page: 3695.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Georgia, 1984.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a The purpose of the present study is to compare and contrast the bases of regime legitimacy in the People's Republic of China and North Korea. It examines and evaluates various definitions of the term, "legitimacy", in an effort to introduce an alternative definition based on human needs. The suggested definition illuminates four bases of legitimacy (i.e., the political, ideological, economic, and social) and corresponding policy goals of a regime. The scope of this study, however, is limited to the assessment of the ideological and economic bases of legitimacy in China and North Korea. In order to compare the two socialist systems in terms of the ideological bases, the study analyses the strategies for achieving the goals of political integration and discusses their outcome. At the same time, the economic basis of legitimacy is addressed as the study examines the policies and institutional means intended to facilitate modernization in both countries. Then, an effort is made to discern and explain the similarities and differences between the two regimes in their strategies for legitimizing power and their outcome. In so doing, it attempts to show the relevance and significance of indigenous contextual variables in explaining various efforts designed to promote regime legitimacy. Finally, the study discusses the implications and prospects by analysing various possible future developments which might affect the present status of legitimacy in China and North Korea.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Marketing. $3 557931
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0338
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of Georgia. $3 1187842
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=8504629 $z click for full text (PQDT)