語系:
繁體中文
English
說明(常見問題)
登入
回首頁
切換:
標籤
|
MARC模式
|
ISBD
Analysis of the Sheltered Instructio...
~
Ingram, Sandra W.
Analysis of the Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol Model on Academic Performance of English Language Learners.
紀錄類型:
書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:
Analysis of the Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol Model on Academic Performance of English Language Learners./
作者:
Ingram, Sandra W.
面頁冊數:
1 online resource (92 pages)
附註:
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: A.
標題:
Education. -
電子資源:
click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:
9780355555240
Analysis of the Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol Model on Academic Performance of English Language Learners.
Ingram, Sandra W.
Analysis of the Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol Model on Academic Performance of English Language Learners.
- 1 online resource (92 pages)
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: A.
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2018.
Includes bibliographical references
This quantitative comparative descriptive study involved analyzing archival data from end-of-course (EOC) test scores in biology of English language learners (ELLs) taught or not taught using the sheltered instruction observation protocol (SIOP) model. The study includes descriptions and explanations of the benefits of the SIOP model to ELLs, especially in content area subjects such as biology. Researchers have shown that ELLs in high school lag behind their peers in academic achievement in content area subjects. Much of the research on the SIOP model took place in elementary and middle school, and more research was necessary at the high school level. This study involved analyzing student records from archival data to describe and explain if the SIOP model had an effect on the EOC test scores of ELLs taught or not taught using it. The sample consisted of 527 Hispanic students (283 females and 244 males) from Grades 9--12. An independent sample t-test determined if a significant difference existed in the mean EOC test scores of ELLs taught using the SIOP model as opposed to ELLs not taught using the SIOP model. The results indicated that a significant difference existed between EOC test scores of ELLs taught using the SIOP model and ELLs not taught using the SIOP model (p = .02). A regression analysis indicated a significant difference existed in the academic performance of ELLs taught using the SIOP model in high school science, controlling for free and reduced-price lunch (p = .001) in predicting passing scores on the EOC test in biology at the school level. The data analyzed for free and reduced-price lunch together with SIOP data indicated that both together were not significant (p = .175) for predicting passing scores on the EOC test in high school biology. Future researchers should repeat the study with student-level data as opposed to school-level data, and data should span at least three years.
Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018
Mode of access: World Wide Web
ISBN: 9780355555240Subjects--Topical Terms:
555912
Education.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:
554714
Electronic books.
Analysis of the Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol Model on Academic Performance of English Language Learners.
LDR
:03173ntm a2200349K 4500
001
914756
005
20180724121429.5
006
m o u
007
cr mn||||a|a||
008
190606s2018 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020
$a
9780355555240
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)AAI10687365
035
$a
(MiAaPQ)capella:19968
035
$a
AAI10687365
040
$a
MiAaPQ
$b
eng
$c
MiAaPQ
100
1
$a
Ingram, Sandra W.
$3
1188092
245
1 0
$a
Analysis of the Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol Model on Academic Performance of English Language Learners.
264
0
$c
2018
300
$a
1 online resource (92 pages)
336
$a
text
$b
txt
$2
rdacontent
337
$a
computer
$b
c
$2
rdamedia
338
$a
online resource
$b
cr
$2
rdacarrier
500
$a
Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 79-04(E), Section: A.
500
$a
Adviser: Chris Stabile.
502
$a
Thesis (Ph.D.)--Capella University, 2018.
504
$a
Includes bibliographical references
520
$a
This quantitative comparative descriptive study involved analyzing archival data from end-of-course (EOC) test scores in biology of English language learners (ELLs) taught or not taught using the sheltered instruction observation protocol (SIOP) model. The study includes descriptions and explanations of the benefits of the SIOP model to ELLs, especially in content area subjects such as biology. Researchers have shown that ELLs in high school lag behind their peers in academic achievement in content area subjects. Much of the research on the SIOP model took place in elementary and middle school, and more research was necessary at the high school level. This study involved analyzing student records from archival data to describe and explain if the SIOP model had an effect on the EOC test scores of ELLs taught or not taught using it. The sample consisted of 527 Hispanic students (283 females and 244 males) from Grades 9--12. An independent sample t-test determined if a significant difference existed in the mean EOC test scores of ELLs taught using the SIOP model as opposed to ELLs not taught using the SIOP model. The results indicated that a significant difference existed between EOC test scores of ELLs taught using the SIOP model and ELLs not taught using the SIOP model (p = .02). A regression analysis indicated a significant difference existed in the academic performance of ELLs taught using the SIOP model in high school science, controlling for free and reduced-price lunch (p = .001) in predicting passing scores on the EOC test in biology at the school level. The data analyzed for free and reduced-price lunch together with SIOP data indicated that both together were not significant (p = .175) for predicting passing scores on the EOC test in high school biology. Future researchers should repeat the study with student-level data as opposed to school-level data, and data should span at least three years.
533
$a
Electronic reproduction.
$b
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
$c
ProQuest,
$d
2018
538
$a
Mode of access: World Wide Web
650
4
$a
Education.
$3
555912
650
4
$a
Science education.
$3
1151737
650
4
$a
Secondary education.
$3
1179560
650
4
$a
English as a second language.
$3
1148422
655
7
$a
Electronic books.
$2
local
$3
554714
690
$a
0515
690
$a
0714
690
$a
0533
690
$a
0441
710
2
$a
ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
$3
1178819
710
2
$a
Capella University.
$b
Education.
$3
1148690
856
4 0
$u
http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10687365
$z
click for full text (PQDT)
筆 0 讀者評論
多媒體
評論
新增評論
分享你的心得
Export
取書館別
處理中
...
變更密碼[密碼必須為2種組合(英文和數字)及長度為10碼以上]
登入