國立虎尾科技大學 |

Emergent arguments : = Digital media and social argumentation.

紀錄類型:	書目-語言資料,手稿 : Monograph/item
正題名/作者:	Emergent arguments :/
其他題名:	Digital media and social argumentation.
作者:	Kelly, Kristy L.
面頁冊數:	1 online resource (204 pages)
附註:	Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-07(E), Section: A.
標題:	Rhetoric. -
電子資源:	click for full text (PQDT)
ISBN:	9781369610413

Emergent arguments : = Digital media and social argumentation.
Kelly, Kristy L.

Emergent arguments :Digital media and social argumentation. - 1 online resource (204 pages)

Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-07(E), Section: A.

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Oregon, 2016.

Includes bibliographical references

This dissertation proposes a new framework for understanding how argumentation and rhetorical action unfold in digital space. While studies in the field of rhetorical theory often address new discursive practices in spaces like Twitter and Facebook, they do not always assess the ways that the platforms themselves can influence the forms and conventions of argumentation. Similarly, the field of new media studies has attended to the structural and technical components of digital platforms, but rarely views these details through a rhetorical lens. Thus, this dissertation combines the two disciplines by approaching its thesis from two angles. First, it employs major scholarly and theoretical work from the field of rhetorical studies to determine the ways in which digital rhetorical practices align with or differ from previous ones. Second, it combines new media scholarship with close readings of digital texts, in order to examine how argumentation functions across different media platforms. This interdisciplinary approach provides unique insight into the ways that media platforms and rhetorical practices coevolve.

Electronic reproduction.
Ann Arbor, Mich. :
ProQuest,
2018

Mode of access: World Wide Web

ISBN: 9781369610413Subjects--Topical Terms:

567738
Rhetoric.
Index Terms--Genre/Form:

554714
Electronic books.

Emergent arguments : = Digital media and social argumentation.
LDR:03224ntm a2200337K 4500 001 915108
005 20180727091509.5
006 m o u
007 cr mn||||a|a||
008 190606s2016 xx obm 000 0 eng d
020 $a 9781369610413
035 $a (MiAaPQ)AAI10246092
035 $a (MiAaPQ)oregon:11752
035 $a AAI10246092
040 $a MiAaPQ $b eng $c MiAaPQ
100 1 $a Kelly, Kristy L. $3 1188355
245 1 0 $a Emergent arguments : $b Digital media and social argumentation.
264 0 $c 2016
300 $a 1 online resource (204 pages)
336 $a text $b txt $2 rdacontent
337 $a computer $b c $2 rdamedia
338 $a online resource $b cr $2 rdacarrier
500 $a Source: Dissertation Abstracts International, Volume: 78-07(E), Section: A.
500 $a Adviser: John Gage.
502 $a Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Oregon, 2016.
504 $a Includes bibliographical references
520 $a This dissertation proposes a new framework for understanding how argumentation and rhetorical action unfold in digital space. While studies in the field of rhetorical theory often address new discursive practices in spaces like Twitter and Facebook, they do not always assess the ways that the platforms themselves can influence the forms and conventions of argumentation. Similarly, the field of new media studies has attended to the structural and technical components of digital platforms, but rarely views these details through a rhetorical lens. Thus, this dissertation combines the two disciplines by approaching its thesis from two angles. First, it employs major scholarly and theoretical work from the field of rhetorical studies to determine the ways in which digital rhetorical practices align with or differ from previous ones. Second, it combines new media scholarship with close readings of digital texts, in order to examine how argumentation functions across different media platforms. This interdisciplinary approach provides unique insight into the ways that media platforms and rhetorical practices coevolve.
520 $a The dissertation's central term, "emergent arguments," marks an epistemological shift away from the idea that an argument resides within a single text or narrative. Instead, arguments emerge from sustained and engaged interactions with digital communities, from explorations of hyperlinked trails of information, from patterns of images, words, and datasets. In digital space, knowledge is constructed communally, meaning that argumentation takes place in collaboration with a community. The project follows closely with the work of Aristotle and Perelman and Olbrechts-Tyteca, where argumentation is an inherently social act driven by cultural context and shared knowledge. The dissertation builds upon this premise by claiming that digital media make this sociality visible, traceable, and more dynamic than previous communicative platforms. It ultimately argues that in digital space, meaning itself is social, intertextual, and multimodal.
533 $a Electronic reproduction. $b Ann Arbor, Mich. : $c ProQuest, $d 2018
538 $a Mode of access: World Wide Web
650 4 $a Rhetoric. $3 567738
650 4 $a Web studies. $3 1148502
655 7 $a Electronic books. $2 local $3 554714
690 $a 0681
690 $a 0646
710 2 $a ProQuest Information and Learning Co. $3 1178819
710 2 $a University of Oregon. $b Department of English. $3 1185553
856 4 0 $u http://pqdd.sinica.edu.tw/twdaoapp/servlet/advanced?query=10246092 $z click for full text (PQDT)